Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

2.99s

  • Plainfield-Union Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com'rs

    30 F.2d 846 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 17, 1928

    . $1,500,000 of this cost would be borne by the plaintiff, as found by this court in Middlesex Water Co. v. Public Uliiitv Commissioners, 10 E.(2d) 519. … Seven and one-quarter per cent, was fixed by the Board of Public Utility Commissioners in the Middlesex Case. Obviously, 7% per cent, is but a reasonable return upon a utility investment. (D. C.) 10 F.(2d) 529 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    85 N.J.L. 123 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1913

    This writ was allowed to review the following order made by the Board of Public Utility Commissioners: “Hereby orders the Public Service Railway Company to. comply with the municipal ordinances of the city of Perth Amboy … Reference is made in the report of the commissioners, and also in the brief of counsel for defendants 'to the case of State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Perth Amboy v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    98 N.J.L. 106 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 8, 1922

    Public Utility Board. 89 Id. 407; O’Brien v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 92 Id. 44, 46. So, in the Atlantic Coast Electric Railway Co. Case, 92 N. J. … L. 157; Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 97 Id. 30. The record shows evidence was taken before the board pro and con.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Asbury Park Board of Education v. New Jersey Department of Education

    180 N.J. 113 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 26, 2004

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • St. Cassian's Catholic Church v. Allen

    77 N.J. Super. 99 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 26, 1962

    Russell v. Tenafly Board of Adjustment, 31 N.J. 58, 65 (1959); Tzeses v. *109 Board of Trustees of South Orange, 22 N.J. Super. 45, 54-55 ( App. Div. 1952); Mingle v. Board of Adjustment, Orange, 6 N.J. … See Andrews v. Ocean Twp. Board of Adjustment, 30 N.J. 245, 250 (1959).

    Reversed on other grounds by St. Cassian's Catholic Church v. Allen, 40 N.J. 46 (1963)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Remington Cash Register Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    108 N.J.L. 418 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1932

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stevens Institute of Technology v. State Board of Taxes & Assessments

    3 N.J. Misc. 1094 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 22, 1925

    The prosecutor seeks in this proceeding to he relieved of taxes assessed for the years 1922 and 1923 by the assessing authorities of the city of Hoboken, confirmed on appeal by the state board of taxes and assessments. … In an opinion by Judg'e Jess, then a member of the board,' the facts are reviewed, and the opinion of Mr. Justice Parker, filed in 1909 (Stevens Institute v. Bowes, 78 N. J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Essex County Welfare Board v. Department of Institutions & Agencies

    147 N.J. Super. 546 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1977

    In A-2733-75 the Essex County Welfare Board notified respondent Brown on November 19, 1975 that her entitlement to public assistance payments pursuant to the AFDC program was being terminated. … [Walker v. Stanhope, 23 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Automobile Salvage Service v. Delran Township Board of Adjustment

    236 N.J. Super. 579 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1989

    When will a zoning use variance, if granted, have so significant an impact upon a municipal development plan that it is beyond the jurisdiction of a board of adjustment and requires a plan amendment? In Dover Tp. v. … The ability of the zoning board to subject the grant of a variance to appropriate conditions. The imposition of reasonable conditions is permissible. North Plainfield v.

    Overruled in part by Vidal v. Lisanti Foods, Inc., 292 N.J. Super. 555 (1996)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fawcett v. Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement System

    307 N.J. Super. 378 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 27, 1998

    As we noted in Flores v. Board of Trustees of the Pub. … The Board’s final decision denying petitioner’s application for an accidental disability pension is reversed. The ALJ's recommended decision was issued prior to our decision in Flores v. Board of Trustees of the Pub.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Township of East Brunswick v. Middlesex County Board of Freeholders

    224 N.J. Super. 44 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 14, 1987

    These include offices, departments, divisions, bureaus, boards, commissions and state agencies. Wade v. N.J. Turnpike Authority, 132 N.J.Super. 92, 97 (Law Div.1975). See also English v. … In Costa v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Paterson & Passaic Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of Assessors

    69 N.J.L. 116 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1903

    , whereupon that board assessed the tax against the company at $11,440.15, and apportioned the same to the various taxing districts in which the property of the company was located. … of Assessors v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • L.S. Ex Rel. S.S. v. Mount Olive Board of Education

    765 F. Supp. 2d 648 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 25, 2011

    v. … Brown, 318 F.3d at 479 (citing Kneipp v. Tedder, 95 F.3d 1199, 1208 (3d Cir.1996)). Plaintiffs are not pursuing this theory here. 6 . As discussed in Points F and G, in arguing that Mr. Iannucci, Ms. Stansberry, and Ms.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Cumberland County Board

    20 N.J. Misc. 107 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 17, 1942

    This act was sustained as constitutional in Commercial Trust Co. v. Hudson County Board of Taxation (Supreme Court, 1914), 86 N. J. L. 424; 92 Atl. Rep. 263 ; affirmed (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1914), 87 N. J. … VanAllen v. Assessors, supra; Home Savings Bank v. City of Des Moines, 205 U. S. 503 ; Des Moines National Bank v. Fairweather, 263 Id. 103; Schuylkill Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania, 296 Id. 113, discussed in 84 U. of Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Downey v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Retirement System

    117 N.J. 128 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1989

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Passaic County Board of Social Services ex rel. T.M. v. A.S.

    442 N.J. Super. 59 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 4, 2015

    State v. Cary, 49 N.J. 343, 352 , 230 A.2d 384 (1967) (voieeprint). See also Romano v. Kimmelman, 96 N.J. 66, 80 , 474 A.2d 1 (1984) (breathalyzer); State v. … In Tonnessen v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Co. for Banking & Trusts v. Board of National Missions

    141 N.J. Eq. 359 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1948

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Millville Board of Education v. New Jersey Department of Education

    367 N.J. Super. 417 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 2004

    The appeal of the Phillipsburg Board of Education (Phillipsburg) was the first of these four matters to reach disposition. … Instead, in light of the Court’s clarification of Abbott V in Abbott v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Borough of Park Ridge v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

    86 N.J.L. 39 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1914

    The judgment of the board of equalization of taxes is challenged upon the ground that jurisdiction to hear and determine such an appeal from an order of the county board of taxation fixing the tax rate has not been conferred … by law upon the board of equalization of taxes.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Board of Educ. of Tp. of Neptune

    907 F. Supp. 826 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 9, 1995

    The Third Circuit, in Gulfstream III Associates, Inc. v. … Gulfstream, 995 F.2d at 420 (quoting Keenan v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.