Case law

Caldwell v. Employees' Comp. Appeals Bd.

285 F. Supp. 3d 97 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 2018

Caldwell filed an appeal of his disability compensation decision with the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board ("ECAB"). See Complaint at 8, 11. Apparently unhappy with ECAB's decision, Mr. … CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board's motion to dismiss Mr. Caldwell's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

Morgan v. Martin

327 A.2d 827 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1974

We take the occasion to repeat the exhortation in Mosley, et al. v. … All this was prior to a Board certification of the result. .

Jones v. McKenzie

628 F. Supp. 1500 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1986

James Brown (May 24, 1984). On June 12, 1984, the Superintendent issued Directive 205.1. … See Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Johnson v. United States, 628 F.2d 187, 194 (D.C.Cir.1980).

Byrd v. United States

388 A.2d 1225 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1978

Brown. (4) Police found in Ms. Brown’s wallet a savings account withdrawal slip. … Brown months earlier.

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Stromberg Sheet Metal Works, Inc.

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,383 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1987

See United States v. Brown, 422 A.2d 1281, 1284 (D.C.1980) (presumption of Congressional awareness of existing statutes). … See Auger v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, 477 A.2d 196, 211-12 (D.C.1984).

Martin v. Donley

886 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2012

. ¶ 5; Def.’s Mem. at 12-13; Pl.’s Opp’n at 15-17. 9 brought within the terms of some other jurisdictional grant,” Brown v. … In fact, the Court finds that the Board for Correction’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. See Knight v.

In Re Godette

919 A.2d 1157 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 2007

Pastor v. … Cane, 134 A.2d 95, 98 (D.C.1957) (reversing for a new trial where the trial court’s decision was based on inferences having no support in the record); In re Brown, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 156, 165 , 454 F.2d 999, 1008 (1971) (applying

Hammond v. D.C. Record Center

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2009

Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. B. … Brown v. Smith, 828 F.2d 1493, 1494-95 (10th Cir. 1987); see Inmates of Occoquan v. Barry, 850 F.2d 796, 796 (D.C.

International Union of Elevator Constructors Local Union No. 8 v. National Labor Relations Board

665 F.2d 376 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 11, 1981

Red Star Express Lines v. NLRB, 196 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 1952). Such is the coercion found by the Board here. … NLRB v.

Gwynne A. Wilcox v. Donald J. Trump

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 2025

But to enforce its orders, the Board must petition a federal court of appeals. Id. § 160(e); see also Dish Network Corp. v. … See Order, Trump v. Cook, No. 25A312 (U.S. Oct. 1, 2025) (member of the Federal Reserve Board); Order, Blanche v. Perlmutter, No. 25A478 (U.S.

Brewers & Maltsters, Local Union No. 6 v. National Labor Relations Board

303 F. App'x 899 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 2008

. *900 The Board adopted a reasonable interpretation of section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (c), which we defer to under the second step of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … Thus, on remand from this court, the Board did exactly as we instructed, see Brewers & Maltsters, Local Union No. 6 v. NLRB, 414 F.3d 36, 48 (D.C.Cir.2005), and petitioner’s arguments to the contrary are meritless.

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Kemp Smith Co.

208 A.2d 737 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 1965

Hall v. Gardiner, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 126 F.2d 227 (1942); Schwartz v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 64 A.2d 298 (1949). 2 In Guinn Company v. … Kirby v. Board of Ed. of Cecil County, 210 Md. 383 , 123 A.2d 606, 610 (1956).

Dillon v. United States

357 F. Supp. 3d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 2019

Brown v. Parker Drilling Offshore Corp. , 410 F.3d 166 , 171 (5th Cir. 2005) ; see also *61 West v. Midland Enters., Inc. , 227 F.3d 613 , 617 (6th Cir. 2000) ; Wactor v. Spartan Transp. … Brown v. Parker Drilling Offshore Corp. , 410 F.3d 166 , 178 (5th Cir. 2005). Dillon's separate Jones Act lawsuit, which was also assigned to my docket, has been settled by the parties. See Dillon v.

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division v. Surface Transportation Board

200 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 2006

See Rainbow/PUSH Coalition v. FCC, 330 F.3d 539, 542 (D.C.Cir.2003) (discussing Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 , 112 S.Ct. 2130 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992)). … Before the Board, the Union relied upon a series of cases rejecting efforts to seek Board approval for transactions not undertaken for bona fide purposes under § 11323(a) and related statutes. See, e.g., Marin County v.

Gross v. Winter

692 F. Supp. 1420 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 1988

Defendant neglects to mention that the court in Browning interpreted Speech and Debate Clause immunity and no other kind. As Judge Posner stated in Forrester v. … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 569 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1735 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). Thus, defendant's categorical contention is incorrect. Similarly, defendant’s broad contention that under Hall v.

Independent Producers Group v. Librarian of Congress

792 F.3d 132 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 2015

Before: BROWN, KAVANAUGH, and MILLETT, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. … In Independent Producers Group v.

Fast Food Workers Committee v. NLRB

31 F.4th 807 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 2022

And it is the Board, not an ALJ, that sets labor policy in accordance with the National Labor Relations Act. See Beth Israel Hosp. v. … relations policy and its effect on the economy” and the imposition of “unprecedented new joint bargaining obligations” on entities deemed joint employers) (overruling BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) (Browning-Ferris

Morgan v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 2016

Board of Parole’s 1987 regulations. (Compl. at 3.) … Date: April 4, 2016 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Gill v. United States Department of Justice

875 F.3d 677 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2017

There, the Court considered whether the1 Merit Systems Protection Board could review the Navy’s denial of a security clearance. 484 U.S. at 520 , 108 S.Ct. 818 . … The government next argues that, even if courts may review some security clearance—related equal protection claims, Gill’s are precluded by Title VII because he alleges discrimination in employment and under Brown v.

Kretchmar v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … In Brandon, an inmate brought suit alleging that he had a protected libert y interest in having the Parole Board adhere to its own procedures, and that the Board deprived him of due process when it delayed his reparole