Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1928

10,000+ results

2.32s

  • Liberian Community Association v. Lamont

    970 F.3d 174 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 14, 2020

    Public officials are entitled to qualified immunity “unless (1) they violated a federal statutory or constitutional right, and (2) the unlawfulness of their conduct was ‘clearly established at the time.’” … “[W]e have repeatedly held[] that a state statute does not serve as ‘clearly established law’ for purposes of qualified immunity.” Tooly v. Schwaller, 919 F.3d 165, 172 (2d Cir. 2019).

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • McKinnon v. Gardner

    Connecticut Appellate Court · Apr 28, 2026

    That qualified immunity “protects government officials performing discretionary functions from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of … “[A] claim for qualified immunity from liability Albert, 50 Conn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Fountain

    121 F. Supp. 2d 571 · District Court, E.D. Texas · Jul 7, 2000

    The court will now proceed to the qualified immunity discussion. IV. QUALIFIED IMMUNITY In his third motion for summary judgment, defendant argues Jones’ claims are barred by qualified immunity. … In assessing a qualified immunity claim the district court must determine “whether (1) the plaintiffs have asserted a constitutional or statutory violation; (2) the law regarding the alleged violation was clearly established

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Michael Wigginton, Jr. v. University of Mississipp

    964 F.3d 329 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 1, 2020

    The district court erred when it denied defendants’ motion for qualified immunity and concluded that Wigginton had a clearly-established property interest. … We regularly grant qualified immunity in substantive due process cases where the plaintiff fails to establish a clearly- established property interest. See, e.g., Wilkerson v. Univ. of N. Tex.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Nance v. Sammis

    586 F.3d 604 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Nov 10, 2009

    Qualified immunity protects government officials from liability under § 1983 when their conduct does not violate “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” … Oct.6, 2009) (finding case law clearly established on this constitutional right as of July 2006).

    Cited 147 timesPublished
  • Jordan v. Sinsheimer

    403 Mass. 586 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 14, 1988

    The defendant asserts that at least qualified immunity is available to him because his conduct did not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. … One issue is whether on clearly established principles of law, he could have reasonably believed his acts to be lawful. Breault v. Chairman of the Bd. of Fire Comm’rs of Springfield, 401 Mass. 26 , 32 (1987).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Payne v. County of Humboldt

    655 F. Supp. 1341 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 18, 1987

    In other words, defendants who act pursuant to their official duties may still be liable under section 1983 if they act unreasonably or in violation of clearly established laws. … To deny him qualified immunity protection unless he goes further and demonstrates that his actions were above the benchmark of legal good faith, would make the concept of qualified immunity a meaningless embellishment.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Edward Furnace v. Paul Sullivan

    705 F.3d 1021 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 17, 2013

    Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982) (qualified immunity is appropriate when “conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”). … Shreve, 535 F.3d 225, 240 (4th Cir. 2008) (denying qualified immunity to a prison guard because the right to be free from excessive use of pepper spray was clearly established).

    Cited 471 timesPublished
  • Duffey v. Bryant

    950 F. Supp. 1168 · District Court, M.D. Georgia · Jan 6, 1997

    Previous cases clearly established that the failure of Duke and Hop-son to do so was deliberate indifference. Accordingly, they are not entitled to qualified immunity. 15 3. … For two examples of cases that found the "clearly established” requirement satisfied and denied qualified immunity without citing a previous case with similar facts, see Powell v. M.C.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Baptiste v. J.C. Penney Company

    147 F.3d 1252 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jun 30, 1998

    QUALIFIED IMMUNITY Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions from individual liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 unless their conduct violates “clearly established statutory … Unless the plaintiff demonstrates both that the defendant’s conduct violated a federal right and the right was clearly established, the defendant must be granted qualified immunity.

    Cited 96 timesPublished
  • Finch v. Rapp

    38 F.4th 1234 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jul 5, 2022

    Clearly Established Having found a constitutional violation, the district court correctly denied qualified immunity because Rapp’s action violated clearly established law. … The court affirmed the denial of qualified immunity. In Walker v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Marwan Mahajni v. Vu Do

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 13, 2026

    On the immunity issues, it denied qualified immunity to Deputy Do, ruling that United States ex rel. Tobe was an anal- ogous case and clearly established that Deputy Do’s conduct violated Mr. … Deputy Woida is entitled to qualified immunity for a sec- ond reason—there’s no clearly established law that says that a bailiff who fails to stop someone else from making an im- proper statement to a juror violates a defendant

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Daren Green v. Heidi Lutz

    679 F. App'x 624 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 9, 2017

    Two Department employees, Heidi Lutz and Dorothy Filson, cross-appeal from the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. … Cty. of Washoe, 843 F.3d 784, 788 (9th Cir. 2016) (reiterating the two-prong analysis in qualified immunity cases: (1) whether the official’s conducted violated a constitutional right; and (2) whether that right was “clearly

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Carswell v. Camp

    37 F.4th 1062 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 17, 2022

    But Carswell says this was “the opposite of a refusal or failure to rule” because the “district court clearly indicated it would timely address Individual Defendants’ qualified immunity defense.” … “Unless the plaintiff’s allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before the commencement of discovery.”

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Baptie v. Bruno and McNeil

    195 Vt. 308 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Dec 6, 2013

    We first address the superior court’s ruling that defendant is entitled to qualified official immunity under, the circumstances of this case. * “Qualified immunity attaches to public officials who are (1) acting during the … An objective person in defendant’s position could not have believed that his conduct violated clearly established law. ¶ 16.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Gericke v. Begin

    753 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · May 23, 2014

    In May 2012, the officers filed motions for summary judgment, arguing in pertinent part that they were entitled to qualified immunity on Gericke's First Amendment claim because there was no clearly established right to … Qualified immunity provides government officials with "breathing room to make reasonable but mistaken judgments" by shielding officials from liability for civil damages for actions that do not violate clearly established

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • McLaine v. Lackawanna County

    30 F. Supp. 3d 316 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 2014

    Qualified immunity shields government officials from civil damages liability unless the official violated a statutory or constitutional right that was clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct_ [C]ourts may … grant qualified immunity on the ground that a purported right was not clearly established by prior case law, without resolving the often more difficult question whether the purported right exists at all....

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Craig v. Martin

    26 F.4th 699 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 15, 2022

    IV At the second step of the qualified immunity analysis, we consider whether Martin’s use of force “violated clearly established statutory or 9 Case: 19-10013 … conduct violated clearly established law is Darden v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Harrill v. Blount County

    55 F.3d 1123 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 31, 1995

    A violation of a clearly established state law can only surmount qualified immunity if it embodies the federal right that is the basis of the § 1983 action. Davis v. … Thus, the defendants did not violate the plaintiff’s clearly established federal rights, and therefore they have qualified immunity from plaintiffs § 1983 claims.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Johnny Banks v. Shelby Hawkins

    999 F.3d 521 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · May 27, 2021

    Where the record does not conclusively establish the lawfulness of an officer’s use of force, summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity is inappropriate. Nance v. … to overcome qualified immunity.

    Cited 20 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.