Case law

Glass v. Carmelite Sisters of St. Therese of the Infant Jesus

496 P.2d 798 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1972

The chairman and vice-chairman of the Board voted in favor of the tax exempt exemptions and the third member of the Board, Wilson V. Glass, County Assessor, voted against the exemption. … This view is in harmony with our decisions in Forston v. Heisler, Okl., 341 P.2d 252 , and Baldwin v. Board of Tax-Roll Corrections, Okl., 331 P.2d 412 , supra.

Marr v. State

558 P.2d 1176 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1977

Brown. . . . ” [Tr. 17] Under such circumstances we cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s Motion for a Change of Venue. See Sam v. State, Okl. Cr., 510 P.2d 978 (1973). … See Gonzales v. State, Okl.Cr., 480 P.2d 930 (1972). We, therefore, find this assignment of error to be without merit.

In Re Assessment of Property of Western Light & Power Corp.

169 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1934

The assessment was made in that amount by the State Board of Equalization. … Travis v. Dickey, Co. Treas., et al., 96 Okla. 256 , 222 P. 527 ; Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Wakefield, 247 U. S. 350 , 62 L. Ed. 1154 .

NICHOLS v. ZIRIAX

518 P.3d 883 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 2022

NICHOLS v. … the Oklahoma State Election Board; JERRY BUCHANAN, Alternate Member of the Oklahoma State Election Board; DEBI THOMPSON, Alternate Member of the Oklahoma State Election Board; and THE HONORABLE J.

Protest of McClaskey

170 Okla. 512 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1935

The appellees contend that the rule of law announced by this court in the Downing Case, supra, and in the cases of *Page 513 Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne, 123 Okla. 137 , 252 P. 423 , Gulf, C. S. F. Railway Co. v. … Excise Board, 141 Okla. 34 , 283 P. 1003 , and Protest of Bledsoe, 161 Okla. 227 , 17 P.2d 979 , to the effect that if an amount is illegally transferred from one fund to another fund, the amount of cash on hand in the second

Ex Parte Jackson

45 Okla. Crim. 448 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1930

Brown, in which he claims to be the owner of certain lands in Seminole county, and contracts with said Wilder and Brown to *450 secure evidence for and to establish his title. … See Egan v. Knewel (D. C.) 298 F. 784 ; Ex parte Brinkman, 93 W. Va. 351 , 116 S. E. 757 ; Scott and Roe, Habeas Corpus, 290.

STATE v. HODGES

2020 OK CR 2 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 2020

In this proposition, the State also appears to argue that Section 759 and the Board of Test rules conflict with the rules of evidence regarding expert testimony under 12 O.S.2011, § 2702 and Taylor v. … STATE Discussed 1974 OK CR 151, 525 P.2d 1359, WESTERMAN v. STATE Discussed 2014 OK CR 14, 334 P.3d 953, STATE v. TERRY Discussed 2016 OK CR 26, 387 P.3d 951, STATE v.

Mayer v. J.T. Jones Sons

113 Okla. 119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1925

Newell v. People, 7 N. Y. 97 ; Hills v. Chicago, 60 Ill. 86 ; Denn v. Reid, 35 U. S. 10 Pet. 524 (9:159); Leonard v. Wiseman, 31 Md. 204 ; People v. Potter, 47 N. Y. 375 ; Cooley, Const. … Clerk, v.

State Ex Rel. Wall v. Holder

279 P.2d 1098 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1955

In Little v. … Dawson v. Dinwiddie, 186 Okl. 63 , 95 P.2d 867 , Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield County, 147 Okl. 126 , 295 P. 223 , and cases there cited.

In Re Rolater

67 Okla. 215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1918

In, the case of the Board of County Commissioners v. Field, 63 Okla. 80 , 162 Pac. 733 . this contention was made, and Mr. … Laws 1910; Balduff v. Griswold, 9 Okla. 438 , 60 Pac. 223 ; Gillett v. Romig, 17 Okla. 324 , 87 Pac. 325 ; Harding v. Gillett, 25 Okla. 199 , 107 Pac. 665 . In the case of the Board of Commissioners v.

Carmickle v. State

45 Okla. Crim. 370 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1929

Browning v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 373 , 239 Pac. 272 ; Wilson v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 139 , 240 Pac. 155 ; Shields v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 344 , 240 Pac. 661 . … In the case of Hubbard v.

Oklahoma Industries Authority v. Barnes

769 P.2d 115 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1988

This position was reaffirmed in Board of Johnson County Com'rs v. … Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, Okl., 285 P.2d 1034, 1042-1043 [1955]. . 68 O.S.1981 § 2419; Jenkins v. Frederick, supra note 4 ; State v. Shamblin, supra note 4 , State v.

Exchange Oil Co. v. State

80 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1920

An appeal may be had from the decision of the State Board of Equalization thereon, by any person aggrieved, to the Supreme Court, in like manner and with like effect as provided by law in other appeals from said board to … No. 2, p. 1423; Ety v. Thoushly, 73 Mich. 123 ; Snyder v. Marks, 109 U. S. 189 ; Street Railway Tax Cases, 92 U. S. 613 ; Shelton v. Platt, 139 U. S. 591 .

Pickens v. Tulsa Metropolitan Ministry

69 O.B.A.J. 1394 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1997

Brown v. Nicholson, Pate, and Spears, 1997 OK 32, ¶ 5 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . Issues of law are reviewable by a de novo standard. … Brown, supra, note 1 at V 6, at 321. 10 . Brown, supra, note 1 at ¶ 6, at 321; Henryetta Construction Co., v. Harris, 1965 OK 88 , 408 P.2d 522, 531-532 (1965). 11 . Brown, supra, note 1 at ¶ 11, at 322. 12 .

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wiggins

5 Okla. 477 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1897

In the case of The Board of Commissioners of Osborne County v. … In the case of Libby v.

Berryman v. Bonaparte

155 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1932

See, also, Oklahoma City v. Coombs, 125 Okla. 194 , 257 P. 295 ; Board of Commissioners of Garfield County v. … McMahan v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 142 Okla. 110 , 285 P. 953 ; Protest of Trimble, 151 Okla. 74 , 300 P. 406 .

Crabtree v. State

18 Okla. Crim. 125 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1920

In Wilcox et al. v. U. S., 7 Ind. T. 86 , 103 S. … Brown v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 382 , 132 Pac. 359 .

Bd. of Com'rs of Oklahoma Cty. v. Beaty, Court Clerk

53 Okla. 393 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1916

Beaty, whereupon the board of county commissioners, not béing satisfied with the judgment of the lower court, instituted this proceeding in error. … Nowhere do we find, as in Ratliff v.

Pitts, Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Muskogee

138 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1928

Every municipality must submit its budget to) the excise board of their respective counties. City of Sapulpa v. Land, 101 Okla. 22 , 223 Pac. 640 ; Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, 101 Okla. 151 , 224 Pac. 969 ; Ryan v. … Roach Drug Co., 113 Okla. 130 , 239 Pac. 913 ; Ryan v. Cook Building & Improvement Co., 113 Okla. 78 , 239 Pac. 919 ; Jones v. Kennedy 118 Okla. 224 , 247 Pac. 53 . Judgment is affirmed. BRANSON, C. J„ MASON, V. O.

Maupin v. Independent School District No. 26

632 P.2d 396 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1981

We are particularly persuaded by Kirk v. … Board of Education of Special Sch.