Case law

New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. S. S. Kresge Co.

113 N.J.L. 287 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 17, 1934

West Jersey and Seashore Railway Co. v. Public Utility Board, 87 N. J. L. 170. The prescribed “standard of conduct” is not, as contended, vague and indefinite. … Rogers v. Brown, 20 N. J. L. 119; Lanning v. Administrator of Lanning, 17 N. J. Eq. 228, 233. All doubt-should be resolved in favor of the general provision rather than the proviso or exception.

Pollara v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Retirement System

183 N.J. Super. 505 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 13, 1982

Cattani v. Police & Firemen’s Retire. Sys. Trustees, 69 N.J. 578, *509 583 (1976). The purpose of the several 1964 amendments was to increase the difficulty in qualifying for benefits. … Hillman v. Pub. Emp. Retire. Sys. Trustees, 109 N.J.Super. 449, 455 (App.Div.1970).

Interstate Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

84 N.J.L. 184 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1913

Third Avenue Railroad Co. et al., v. Public Service Commission, 203 N. Y. 299 . … McGovern v. Board of Works, 28 Vroom 580 ; Colonial Trust Co. v. Scheffey (per curiam), 69 Atl. Rep. 455 . Bor these reasons we have concluded to refuse the writ of ;mandamus, and to dismiss the writ of certiorari.

Borough of Glassboro v. Gloucester County Board of Chosen Freeholders

98 N.J. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 7, 1984

Mastrangelo, Inc. v. … APPENDIX BOROUGH OF GLASSBORO, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, et ah, Defendant.

In re Brown

231 N.J. 166 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 17, 2017

ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-339, concluding that SALEEMAH MALI-KAH BROWN of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2008, should be censured for … making a false or misleading communication about the attorney’s legal fee), and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty), fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that SALEEMAH MALIKAH BROWN

Asbury Park Board of Education v. New Jersey Department of Education

180 N.J. 109 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 2004

ORDER The within matter having been initiated by the Boards of Education of Asbury Park, Keansburg, Passaic, Phillipsburg, and Trenton (Boards) on an application for emergent relief in respect of the Boards’ appeal from the … Burke, 153 N.J. 480 , 710 A2d 450 (1998) (Abbott V) to extend by an additional year the one-year relaxation of remedies previously granted in Abbott v. Burke, 172.

North Plainfield Education Ass'n Ex Rel. Koumjian v. Board of Education

96 N.J. 587 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1984

Board of Educ. of Bernards Tp. v. Bernards Tp. Educ. Ass’n, 79 N.J. 311, 321 (1979). Evaluation of that service is a management prerogative essential to the discharge of the duties of a school board. … Delaware State College v.

Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.

123 F. Supp. 2d 245 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 5, 2000

Brown-Forman, 476 U.S. at 578-79 , 106 S.Ct. 2080 . … See, e.g., Healy, 491 U.S. at 326 , 109 S.Ct. 2491 (Connecticut statute); Brown-Forman, 476 U.S. at 584 , 106 S.Ct. 2080 (New York statute); Kassel v.

Bower v. Board of Educ. of City of East Orange

287 N.J. Super. 15 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 30, 1996

Merin v. Maglaki, 126 N.J. 430, 436-37 , 599 A. 2d 1256 (1992); Singer v. Board of Review, 273 N.J. Super. 72, 77 , 640 A. 2d 1209 (App.Div. 1994). … See Dore v. Board of Educ., 185 N.J. Super. 447, 452 , 449 A. 2d 547 (App.Div. 1982).

Borough of Florham Park v. Department of Health

7 N.J. Misc. 549 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 5, 1929

Corp. (5th ed.), § 521; Barnert v. Paterson, 48 N. J. L. 395; Oxford v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad, 64 Id. 195; Brown v. District of Columbia, 127 U. S. 579 ; United States v. Ballin, 144 Id. 1. … L. 395; Outwater v. Carlstadt, 66 Id. 510; Tappan v. Long Branch, 59 Id. 371. Since the action of the board was not properly taken, it is unnecessary to consider the other points raised.

Bacon v. Miller

113 N.J. Super. 271 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 5, 1971

Clarke v. Brown, 101 N.J. Super. 404 (Law Div. 1968). … However, this issue was squarely passed upon in Clarke v. Brown, *279 101 N.J.

Trenton & Mercer County Traction Corp. v. Mercer County Board of Taxation

92 N.J.L. 398 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 18, 1918

That evidence was necessary in the very point decided in Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 86 N. J. L. 592. … Security Trust Co. v. Lexington, 203 U. S. 323 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Q-T Shoe Manufacturing Co.

279 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 19, 1968

Corp. v. … The Board relies heavily on Martin v.

Borough of Woodcliff Lake v. State Board of Tax Appeals

117 N.J.L. 114 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 2, 1936

Mortland v. State ex rel. Christian

52 N.J.L. 521 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1890

Rader v. Union, 10 Vroom 509 , 518. … Scudder, Brown, Clement, Cole, Smith, W hitaker. 9.. For reversal—Mague, Reed. 2.

Mayor of Newark v. State Board of Equalization of Taxes

81 N.J.L. 416 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 6, 1911

George C. Riley v. New Jersey State Parole Board (069327)

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 2014

RILEY, Appellant-Respondent, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent-Appellant. … The Board’s reasoning is not supported by United States Supreme Court jurisprudence. In Johnson v.

In re Brown

148 N.J. 84 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 13, 1997

ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board on October 30,1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ROBERT C. … BROWN of OLD BRIDGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violations of RPC 3.5(a) (seeking to influence a judge), RPC 3.5(c) (conduct

STC CORP. v. Plan. Bd. of Tp. of Hillsborough

194 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 15, 1984

CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HILLSBOROUGH, SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … Clark, Jr., attorney for appellant. *335 Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys for respondent ( Morris Brown, Stephen E. Barcan and Brian J. Molloy, of counsel and on the brief).

Pomanowski v. MONMOUTH CTY. BD. OF RELATORS

89 N.J. 306 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1982

In Marin County Board of Realtors, Inc. v. … (CCH) ¶ 62,388 (N.D.Ill.1978) (relying on Brown, supra, for proposition that Board membership is acceptable limitation on multiple listing service participation); Colorado ex rel. MacFarlane v.