Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,550 results
0.43s
40 Me. 415 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1885
It was held in Smith v. … Robinson v. Smith, 3 Paige, 222 ; Hersey v. Veazie, 24 Maine, 9; Cunningham v. Pitt, 5 Paige, 607 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedTripp v. Park Street Motor Corp.
122 Me. 59 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 30, 1922
Chitty on Pleading, Vol. 1 pages 301, 302; Bean v. Ayers, 67 Maine, 488; Brown v. Starbird, 98 Maine, 292; Coffin v. Hall, 106 Maine, 126, 128; Hopkins v. Erskine, 118 Maine, 276. The case of Chickering v. … See Smith v. Hunt, 91 Maine, 572; Copeland v. Hewett, 93 Maine, 556; Cole v. Cole, 112 Maine, 315; Gilbert v. Cushman, 113 Maine, 525; Stowell v. Hooper, 121 Maine, 152.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHamlin v. Perticuler Baptist Meeting House
103 Me. 343 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1907
Paúl shall stand,” Walsingham’s Case, 2 Plowd. 557, "As long as used for said canal,” State v. Brown, 27 N. J. … Packard v. Old Colony R. R. Co., 168 Mass. 92 ; Craig v. Inhs. of Franklin Co., 58 Maine, 479.
Cited 9 timesPublishedKimball v. North East Harbor Water Co.
107 Me. 467 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 26, 1911
v. … Lumbard v. Stevens, 4 Cush. 60 ; Turner v. Revere Water Co., 171 Mass. 329 ; Water Co. v. Adams, 84 Maine, 472; Wood v. Auburn, 87 Maine, 287; Robbins v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Feb 22, 2023
See Stiff v. … Although a municipal board’s interpretation of an ordinance is a question of law that the court reviews de novo, (Aydelott v. City of Portland, 2010 ME 25, { 10, 990 A.2d 1024; Logan v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMarcel Dubois v. Department of Environmental Protection
2017 ME 224 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 7, 2017
v. … v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedWatson v. Portland & Cape Elizabeth Railway Co.
44 L.R.A. 157 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 13, 1898
Meesel v. Lynn & Boston Railroad Co., 8 Allen, 234 ; Maguire v. Middlesex Railroad Co., 115 Mass. 239 ; Fleck v. Union Railway Co., 134 Mass. 480 ; Germantown Passenger Railway Co. v. Walling, 97 Penn. St. 55; Vail v. … Elliot v. Newport Street Railway Co., 18 R. I. 707, (23 L. R. A. 208): Pray v. Omaha St. Railway Co., 44 Neb. 167 ; Wilde v. Lynn & Boston R. R. Co., 163 Mass. 533 ; Reber v. Pittsburg & B. Traction Co., 179 Penn.
Cited 11 timesPublishedState v. Eastern Steamship Lines Inc.
124 Me. 76 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 7, 1924
State v. Stafford, 67 Maine, 125. State v. Frazier, 79 Maine, 95. … employees not to handle intoxicants, distributed circulars containing extracts from the Federal Prohibition Act; admonished its officials and servants to obey the law; stationed a watchman to prevent unauthorized persons from boarding
Cited 0 timesPublished159 Me. 260 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 3, 1963
Brown, Petr. v. State, 153 Me. 512, 513 ; 138 A. (2nd) 462. … See Pike, Petr. v. State, 152 Me. 78, 82 ; 123 A. (2nd) 774.
Cited 3 timesPublishedElliott v. Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission
486 A.2d 106 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 31, 1984
Board of Educ. of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir.1979). 428 A.2d at 426 n. 4. … In Poussard v.
Cited 17 timesPublished624 F. Supp. 2d 132 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 10, 2009
Landis v. N. Am. … v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedJ. A. Greenleaf & Sons Co. v. Free-Andrews Shoe Co.
123 Me. 352 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 31, 1923
Shaw v. … If we apply the foregoing well-settled principles of law found in Shaw v. Young, supplemented by the rule found in Hanson v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHammond v. Consolidated Rendering Co.
125 Me. 491 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 30, 1926
An action of assumpsit to recover for the boarding and pasturing of certain horses alleged to be the property of the defendant company. *492 In 1922, the plaintiff, who was then indebted to the defendant for fertilizer furnished … LaFontain v. Hayhurst, 89 Maine, 388; Clary v. Clary, 93 Maine, 220; Leighton v. Nash, 111 Maine, 525, 528; Gordon v. Keene, 118 Maine, 269.
Cited 1 timesPublished107 Me. 40 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 21, 1910
After remaining in jail some three weeks, his board not being paid, the debtor was allowed to go free at his own request. … The case, Hussey v. Danforth, 77 Maine, 17, to the same effect is affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBennett v. American Express Co.
13 L.R.A. 33 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 24, 1891
Adams v. Scott, 104 Mass. 166 ; Kiff v. Old Colony and Newport Railway, 117 Mass. p. 593; Fillebrown v. Grand Trunk Railway Company, 55 Maine, 462. In the case of Edwards v. … Fille *241 brown v. Grand Trunk Railway Company, 55 Maine, 462. "A carrier may limit his responsibility for property intrusted to him,” says Bigelow, C. J., in Buckland v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSwan v. Andrew Crowe & Sons, Inc.
434 A.2d 1008 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 16, 1981
In Kidder v. … See, e. g., Robbins v. Bates Fabrics, Inc., Me., 412 A.2d 374, 376-77 (1980) (apportionment according to contribution to the disabling condition); Pottle v. Brown, Me., 408 A.2d 1011, 1013 (1979) (same); Widdecombe v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedInhabitants of South Thomaston v. Inhabitants of Friendship
95 Me. 201 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 1, 1901
Fogg v. Greene, 16 Maine, 282; Bangor Boom Corp. v. Whitney, 29 Maine, 123; Towle v. Blake, 38 Maine, 528; Goodwin v. Clark, 65 Maine, 280; Soule v. Bruce, 67 Maine, 584. … Bowdoinham v. Phippsburg, 63 Maine, 501; Ripley v. Hebron, supra; No. Yarmouth v. W. Gardiner, supra; Etna v. Brewer, 78 Maine, 377. *209 In Ripley v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFirst of Maine Commodities v. Dube
534 A.2d 1298 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1987
Bowley v. Paine, 291 A.2d 712, 714 (Me. 1972). See also Jordan v. McNally, 124 Me. 216, 220-21 , 126 A. 876, 877 (1924). … Regulatory boards. Transactions or actions otherwise permitted under laws as administered by any regulatory board or officer acting under statutory authority of the State or of the United States; .... Id. § 208(1).
Cited 17 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jun 7, 2021
Friends of Lamoine v. … of a PUD- V.”
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna