Case law

Brown v. Wood

19 Mo. 475 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1854

Brown sued Wood for labor and materials, before a justice of the peace in attachment. The suit was .commenced on the 2d December, 1852, and the account was dated 11th September, 1852.

Brown v. Sims

22 Ind. App. 317 · Indiana Court of Appeals · May 10, 1899

Kahl v. Love, 37 N. J. L. 5. In Zweigardt v. Birdseye, 57 Mo. … In Day v.

Brown v. . Turner

70 N.C. 93 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

A judgment in mandamus , does not decide the title, for if the plaintiff obtained judgment against Howerton, it would not estop Turner from bringing his action against the plaintiff, Brown. … *Page 95 The right sought to be tried, is not one between Brown and Howerton, but between Turner and Brown, yet the mandamus is against Howerton, a third party, who has no interest in the controversy, except to know who is

State v. Barnes

58 Haw. 333 · Hawaii Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1977

Here, there was absolutely no justification for the seizure and search of the brown paper bag following the initial stop. … Compare, State v. Goudy, supra. The record shows that in no way could the arresting officer have known of the marijuana in the brown paper bag without first seizing it and examining its contents.

Brown v. State

88 So. 3d 726 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 22, 2012

The following statement of facts is taken from this Court’s opinion in Brown v. … Strickland v.

Brown v. . Foster

108 N.Y. 387 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1888

(Reed v. Randall, 29 N. Y. 358 ; Beck v. Sheldon, 48 id. 365 ; Dutchess Co. v. Harding, 49 id. 321.) *392 The cases cited by the learned counsel for the appellant have been examined. … (Lillywhite v. Devereux, 15 M. & W. 285.)

Brown v. State

1 Morr. St. Cas. 974 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1872

The obligation thus created is regarded by the law as equal to that imposed by a positive oath *982 in a court of justice. 1 Bex v. Woodcock, 2 Leach Cr. Cases, 567. … was a dispute arose between them, standing face to face, some eight or nine feet apart; after some conversation, Brown gave to Tatum the damned lie repeatedly; the said Brown then said, he intended shooting of him ; after

People v. Brown

100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 211 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 2000

Introduction Defendant, Linda Catherine Brown, appeals from her conviction for attempted voluntary manslaughter. (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 664, 192, subd. (a).) … (People v.

Franklin v. . Brown

118 N.Y. 110 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1889

(Witty v. Matthews, 52 N. Y. 512 ; Jaffe v. Harteau, 56 N. Y. 398 ; Edwands v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co. 98 N. Y. 245 ; Cleves v. Willoughby, 7 Hill, 83 ; Mumford v. Brown, 6 Cow. 475 ; Westlake v. … (Edwards v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co. 98 N. Y. 248 ; Howard v. Doolittle, 3 Duer, 475 ; Carson v. Godley, 26 Penn. St. 117; Dutton v. Gerrish, 9 Cush. 89 ; Chadwick v. Woodward, 13 Abb. [N. C.] 441; Coulson v.

Brown v. State

478 S.W.2d 550 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 1, 1972

BROWN: Yes, sir.” “THE COURT: You are not doing this [pleading guilty] because anyone promised you anything? “MR. BROWN: No, sir.” … Trautschold v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 466 S.W.2d 586 ; Martin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 452 S.W.2d 481 , and the cases cited therein. Article 42.12, Sec. 4, Vernon’s Ann.

Davis v. Brown

67 Mo. 313 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1878

The most recent cases on this subject are Eyerman v. Mt. Sinai Cemetery Association, 61 Mo. 490 ; Yeats v. Ballentine. 56 Mo. 530 . This instruction was consequently erroneous.

Brown v. Kingsley

38 Iowa 220 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 22, 1874

Way v. The Ill. Cent. R'y Co., 35 Iowa, 585 , and cases cited. ____“ mayrefuseto answer. III. … This instruction expresses the law as held by this court in' Smith v. Milburn, 17 Iowa, 30 , and Delvee v. Boardman, 20 Id., 446. 6 _„___. instruction, V.

Commonwealth v. Brown

473 Pa. 562 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1977

Appellant Melvin Douglas Brown was indicted on charges of murder and voluntary manslaughter arising out of the October 13, 1973 killing of Mary Lee Walters. … In Commonwealth v.

Morris v. . Brown

111 N.Y. 318 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1888

(M'Kenzie v. … In Gillshannon v.

Dobbins v. . Brown

119 N.Y. 188 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1890

(Corcoran v. Holbrook, 59 N. Y. 517 ; Pantzar v. Tilly Foster Iron Mining *193 Go., 99 id. 368.) … (Curtis v. R. & S. R. R. Co., 18 N. Y. 534 .)

Brown v. Rosenbaum

287 N.Y. 510 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1942

(See Broderick v. Aaron [Kornberg], 268 N. Y. 260 ; State ex rel. Squire v. Harris, 59 Ohio App. 165 ; affd., 135 Ohio St. 449 ; Willing v. Jensen, 17 Fed. Supp. 596; Willing v. Pennsylvania Co., 21 Fed. Supp. 233.) … (Broderick v. Aaron [Rice], 264 N.

Ellis v. Brown

6 Barb. 282 · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 1849

The indorsement of Brown was inoperative, as such, until Newell, Daniels &• Co. had indorsed their names upon it. In the language of Chief Justice Spencer, in Herrick v. … (Manrow v. Durham, 3 Hill, 584 . Luqueer v. Prosser, 1 Id. 256 ; S.. C. in error, 4 Id. 420. Miller v. Gaston, 2 Id. 188. Hunt v. Brown, 5 Id. 145. Hough v. Gray, 19 Wend. 202. Ketchell v. Burns, 24 Id. 456. 26 Id. 430.

People v. Brown

67 N.Y.2d 555 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1986

41, 68 , cert denied — US —, 105 S Ct 1226 ; compare, People v Geaslen, 54 NY2d 510 ). … The weight to be accorded such testimony lies within the province of the trier of fact (People v Thomas, 53 NY2d 983 ).

Brown v. State

72 Miss. 997 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1895

In State v. … See the note to Smith v. State, 80 Am.

Hughes v. Brown

8 L.R.A. 480 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1890

Virginia Brown and her chil *581 dren, remainder, at death of Mrs. Brown, to her children then living and the representatives of such as are dead. … Elmendorf v. Taylor, 10 Wheat., 168 ; Smith v. Clay, 3 Brown, C. C., 640; Hovenden v. Annesley, 2 Sch. & Lef., 632; Porter's Lessee v. Cocke, Peck, 43; Shelby’s Heirs v. Shelby, Cooke, 184 ; Armstrong v.