Case law

Port of Portland v. Municipal Employees, Local 483

27 Or. App. 479 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 29, 1976

Local 483 argues that the Board’s order is not appealable, citing Klamath Co. v. Laborers Inter. Union, 21 Or App 281 , 534 P2d 1169 (1975). … Klamath Co. v. Laborers Inter. Union, supra.

EBI Companies v. Cooper

100 Or. App. 246 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 17, 1990

See Schlect v. SAIF, 60 Or App 449, 455 , 653 P2d 1284 (1982). … The Board stated: “In Ebbtide Enterprises v.

Leslie v. U.S. Bancorp

129 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 1994

See Safeway Stores v. Smith, supra. … We have since held that the Board has the authority to review the director’s application of existing rating standards and to remand in appropriate circumstances. Gallino v.

Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Nichols

186 Or. App. 664 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 6, 2003

Andrews v. Tektronix, Inc., 323 Or 154 , 160-61 n 1, 915 P2d 972 (1996) (emphasis in original). … In Kaiel v.

Bowman v. SAIF Corp.

278 Or. App. 417 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 2016

See Dotson v. … Or Laws 1991, ch 312, § 1. 4 The amendment was designed to overrule Jones v.

Johnson v. Employment Division

56 Or. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 1982

Claimant seeks judicial review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board (Board) disqualifying him for unemployment compensation benefits on the ground of misconduct in connection with his work. … See, e.g., Bremer v. Employment Division, 52 Or App 293, 296-298 , 628 P2d. 426 (1981). Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Hamel v. Johnson

169 Or. App. 216 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 2000

See Peek v. Thompson, 160 Or App 260 , 980 P2d 178 , rev dismissed 329 Or 553 (1999); Weidner v. … In Bedell v.

Beaverton School District No. 48 v. Employment Division

29 Or. App. 487 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 23, 1977

Aschenbrenner v. Employment Div., 29 Or App 345 , 563 P2d 757 (1977); Tolonen v. Employment Div., 25 Or App 575 , 549 P2d 1294 (1976); Weidert v. Employment Division, 22 Or App 474 , 539 P2d 1116 (1975). … The decision of the Board is reversed as "unlawful in substance.” ORS 657.282; 183.482(8)(a). Cf. Chamblee v. Employment Div., 23 Or App 53 , 541 P2d 165 (1975).

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Woda

166 Or. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 2000

Employer appealed to the Board, and a divided Board affirmed. … Having said that, we conclude that the Board majority and claimant have the better of the argument. Our analysis begins with the text of the relevant statute in its context. PGE v.

Minniti v. Employment Division

21 Or. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 1975

controversy” — Minniti v. … In affirming a decision of the Board denying benefits to a student attending Lane Community College, this court noted in Callaghan v.

Ds Waters of America, Lp v. Prabucki

240 Or. App. 384 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2011

See OAR 438-006-0023; SAIF v. Kollias, 233 Or App 499 , 227 P3d 188 (2010). Claimant objected to the admission of the report, and the ALJ excluded it. … See Schoch v.

State v. Toquero

228 Or. App. 547 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 2009

See State v. … State v.

Washer v. Clatsop Care & Rehabilitation District

304 Or. 3 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1987

See Forrester v. City of Hillsboro, 156 Or 89 , 66 P2d 496 (1937) (charter required corporation to contract only pursuant to written ordinance or resolution of the governing board); White v. … In addition to cases cited supra, see Barbour & Son v.

Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Golden

116 Or. App. 64 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 4, 1992

Respondent argues that Scarino v. SAIF, 91 Or App 350 , 755 P2d 139 , rev den 306 Or 660 (1988), authorizes the probate court to distribute proceeds of a wrongful death action before the paying agency’s lien is paid. … See also Robertson v. Davcol, Inc., 99 Or App 542 , 783 P2d 43 (1989). Here, the settlement was of an action brought for the benefit of persons who are workers’ compensation beneficiaries.

Gaffey v. State

55 Or. App. 186 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 1981

The Supreme Court, in Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., supra, 280 Or at 105 .

Short v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

88 Or. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1987

Short v. SAIF, 79 Or App 423, 429 , 719 P2d 894 (1986). … Shoulders v. SAIF, 300 Or 606, 615 , 716 P2d 651 (1986); Greenslitt v. City of Lake Oswego, 88 Or App 94 , 744 P2d 577 (1987). That statute does not provide for circuit court review of attorney fees.

Crampton v. Harmon

20 Or. App. 676 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 31, 1975

Mohr v. State Board of Education, 236 Or 398, 401 , 388 P2d 463 (1964). ‘Informational’ hearings are conducted like hearings before legislative committees that are considering proposed legislation. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US 564 , 92 S Ct 2701 , 33 L Ed 2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sinderman, 408 US 593 , 92 S Ct 2694 , 33 L Ed 2d 570 (1972).

V. W. Johnson & Sons v. Johnson

103 Or. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 12, 1990

See Spivey v. SAIF, 79 Or App 568 , 720 P2d 755 (1986); Wilson v. SAIF, 48 Or App 993 , 618 P2d 473 (1980); Horn v. Timber Products, Inc., 12 Or App 365 , 507 P2d 36 (1973). … Wilson v. SAIF, supra, 48 Or App at 998 . However, the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Drews v.

Ligatich v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.

185 Or. App. 555 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 8, 2003

Sperry, Inc. v. Wells, 127 Or App 700, 703-04 , 874 P2d 80 (1994); see also Gilbert v. … The board was required to address every contested issue before it. See Dan McCormick Agency v. Employment Division, 99 Or App 47, 50-51 , 781 P2d 370 (1989).

In Re Compensation of Cayton

231 Or. App. 644 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 4, 2009

See State v. Gaines, 346 Or. 160, 171 , 206 P.3d 1042 (2009). … State v. Blair, 230 Or.App. 36, 47 , 214 P.3d 47 (2009).