Case law

Manning v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

74 O.B.A.J. 1872 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 2003

Abdoo v. State ex rel. Dept. of Pub. Safety, 1990 OK CIV APP 2 , ¶ 11, 788 P.2d 1389, 1393 . ¶ 5 The material facts presented here are not in dispute and therefore this case presents a question of law. Thomas v. … Rhea v. Southwest Cupid, 1998 OK CIV APP 97, ¶ 9 , 969 P.2d 1000, 1002 . DISCUSSION OF ISSUES 1. Did the Trial Court Have Authority to Address the “Approved Device” Issue?

Watkins v. Grieser

11 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1901

(Black on Intoxicating Liquors, s. 162; Stockwell v. Brand, 97 Ind. 474 ; Hill v. Perry, 82 Ind. 28 ; Groscup v. Rainier, 111 Ind. 361 ; Golden v. Bingham,, 61 Ind. 198 .) … As was said in Swan v.

Visteon Corp. v. Yazel

75 O.B.A.J. 1812 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 7, 2004

Co. v. … See Means v. Blevins, 1995 OK 76 , 898 P.2d 1286 ; Dolese Bros. Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Comanche County, 1931 OK 480 , 2 P.2d 955 .

Westlake v. Cooper

69 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1918

In Board of Trustees of Westminster College v. Piersol, 161 Mo. 271 , 61 S. … Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma City Times Co. v. Baker

43 Okla. 646 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1914

. *650 In City of Orlando v. … Co. v. Douglas Co. et al., 78 Neb. 244 , 110 N. W. 624 .

In Re Earlsboro Gas Co.'s Assessment

165 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1933

These sections of the statute provide an orderlv method of proceedings of the board and the taxpayer whereby a taxpayer feeling himself aggrieved by the action of the board may, during the session of the board, or within … Its appeal herein to review the action of the State Board of Equalization is, therefore, dismissed. RILEY, O. J., OULLISON. V. C. X, and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, and BUSBY, JJ., concur. BAY-LESS, X, absent.

Johnson v. State

550 P.2d 984 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1976

In the case of Pickens v. … This Court stated in Anderson v.

State Ex Rel. Murray v. Carter

167 Okla. 473 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1934

Co. v. Welch, 29 Kan. 672 ; Blanding v. Burr, 13 Cal. 343 ; Smith v. Board of Com’rs of Atchison County, 81 Kan. 91 , 105 P. 37 ; State ex rel. Miller, Atty. Gen., v. Taylor, 22 N. D. 362 , 133 N. … W. 1046 ; Thalheimer v. Board of Sup’rs of Maricopa County, 11 Ariz. 430 , 94 P. 1129 ; Thompson v. Trice, 145 Ark. 143 , 223 S. W. 367 ; Miller v. Witcher, 160 Ark. 479 , 254 S. W. 1063 ; State ex rel. Zilisch v.

Winters v. Governor's Special Committee

441 P.2d 370 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1967

Green v. Board of Com’rs of Lincoln County, 126 Okl. 300 , 259 P. 635, 637 ; see also, Mills v. Smith, Okl., 355 P.2d 1064, 1066 ; State ex rel. Tharel v. … Heartsill v. County Election Board of Carter County, Okl., 326 P.2d 782, 786 .

Muskogee Fair Haven Manor Phase I, Inc. v. Scott

69 O.B.A.J. 1167 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1998

Edwards v. Board of Com’rs, 169 Okla. 87 , 36 P.2d 6 (1934) (the Court’s syllabus). Finally, a judge’s powers in equity are not invocable when clear and adequate statutory remedies are available. Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. … Tway, Inc. v.

Clarence L. Boyd Co., Inc. v. Blachly

171 Okla. 626 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1935

Bonsteel v. … In Threadgill et al. v.

State v. Sandfer

93 Okla. Crim. 228 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1951

the board. … In Davis v.

Cotton v. Blake

133 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1928

In Carroll v. … This question was settled in Board of Com’rs of Canadian County v. Tinklepaugh, 49 Okla. 440 , 152 Pac. 1119 ; and in Carrico v. Crocker, 38 Okla. 440 , 133 Pac. 181 .

State Ex Rel. City of Mangum v. Greer

188 Okla. 504 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1941

*505 This court has not heretofore decided the question thus presented, although in Tulsa County Excise Board v. … What we have said with reference to those acts of the Legislature in Lowden et al. v. Washita County Excise Board, 186 Okla. 708 , 100 P. 2d 459 , and Tulsa County Excise Board v.

Andrews v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety

320 P.3d 27 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 2013

Safety v. Kelley, 2007 OK CIV APP 99, ¶ 7 , 172 P.3d 231, 234 (citations omitted). See also Justus v. State ex rel. Dep't of Pub. … Comm'rs of Land Office v.

Weber v. Dillon

7 Okla. 568 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1898

(Fisher v. U. S., 1 Okl. 252 , 31 Pac. 195 ; Kingman v. Pixley, this volume, p. 351, 54 Pac. 494 .) … The question of the power of the territorial board of equalization to equalize the various assessments as re *572 turned by tbe several counties was fully discussed in tbe case of Wallace v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Holland

117 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1926

Brown, which plaintiff alleges collided with his wagon, in which he was riding, at a public street crossing in the city of Holdenville, Okla. … Ed.) sec. 16; Honick v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. (Kan.) 71 Pac. 265 ; White v. Oliver, 32 Okla. 479 , 122 Pac. 156 ; McAlester v. Ealy, 98 Okla. 223 , 225 Pac. 146 .

Taylor v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

407 F. Supp. 69 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1976

Defendant relies upon the opinion of the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Brown v. Brown, 410 P.2d 52 (1966), wherein the court, with reference to a release containing language similar to the above, stated: “ . . . … Accordingly, Brown is not controlling; the question thus is whether the release reflects the intent to release this alleged tortfeasor. The intent of the parties is the paramount consideration. All American Bus Lines v.

In Re Assessment of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.

175 Okla. 444 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1936

Co. v. Fonville, 36 Okla. 76 , 125 P. 1125 ; Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. Bridges, 37 Okla. 430 , 132 P. 133 ; Leonard v. Showalter, 41 Okla. 122 , 137 P. 346 ; Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. … Lamb et al., 58 Okla. 22 , 158 P. 579 ; Mickleson v. Helm, Same v. Templeton, 89 Okla. 90 , 214 P. 117 .

School Dist. No. 62 v. Morgan

127 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1927

In School District No. 16 v. … Also, in Ryan v.