Case law

Wilson v. State Farm Insurance

326 Or. 413 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1998

In Redman Industries, Inc. v. … See ORS 656.012(2)(a) (so stating); see also Andrews v. Tektronix, Inc., 323 Or 154, 159-60 , 915 P2d 972 (same); Clark v. U.S.

Waybrant v. Clackamas County

54 Or. App. 740 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 1981

Plaintiff named as defendants the Board of Commissioners and each individual member thereof. … In a county having a board of county commissioners consisting of three commissioners, county business shall be transacted by the board or a majority of the commissioners.” 3 See Southern Pacific v.

SAIF v. Ward

369 Or. 384 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 2022

The Court of Appeals affirmed the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board. SAIF v. Ward, 307 Or App 337, 347, 477 P3d 429 (2020). … As we explained in South Beach Marina, Inc. v.

Rohde v. State Industrial Accident Commission

108 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1923

According to People v. Brown, 67 Ill. 435 , quoted with approval in Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Omaha, 63 Neb. 280 ( 88 N. W. 523 , 93 Am. St. … See also Tyler v. Bailey, 71 Ill. 34 ; People v. Seward Highway Commrs., 27 Barb. (N. Y.) 94; Searcy v. Yarnell, 47 Ark. 269 ( 1 S. W. 319 ); Chicago v. Sexton, 115 Ill. 230 ( 2 N. E. 263 ); Rissing v. Ft.

J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of Revenue

11 Or. Tax 245 · Oregon Tax Court · Jul 28, 1989

Whipple v. Howser, 291 Or 475 , 632 P2d 782 (1981). … North Clackamas School Dist. v. White, 305 Or 48 , 750 P2d 485 (1988); Lincoln County v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 17 (1988).

Markham & Callow, Inc. v. International Woodworkers

170 Or. 517 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1943

Allen Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board (supra) at p. 1164 and 1165. In Wisconsin Employment Relations Board v. … Oughton v. National Labor Relations Board, 3 Cir., 118 F. 2d 486, 490 .

Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANY

250 Or. 39 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1968

Thus in Olson v. State Ind. Acc. … Our power to review under the previous law may be illustrated by the ease of Olson v. State Ind. Ago. Com., supra.

State v. Rhoades

54 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 1981

We address, first, defendant’s argument that Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, 2 as applied in Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Defendant relies on Argersinger v.

First Interstate Bank v. Clark

133 Or. App. 712 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 1995

Whether the employe was on a personal mission of his own * * Jordan v. Western Electric, 1 Or App 441,443-44 , 463 P2d 598 (1970); see also Halfman v. … See Kiewit Pacific v. Ennis, 119 Or App 123, 126 , 849 *720 P2d 541 (1993).

Toole ex rel. Professional Liability Fund v. EBI Companies

108 Or. App. 57 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 1991

We upheld the Board without discussing its authority to decide the issue. In EBI Companies v. … We have held that the Board has no authority to modify third party action settlement agreements. See SAIF v. Cowart, supra, 65 Or App at 738 ; see also Estate of Troy Vance v.

Sparling v. Providence Health System Oregon

258 Or. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 21, 2013

Cf Altamirano v. … Co. v.

State v. Belander

274 Or. App. 167 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 2015

State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 277 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986). On appeal, defendant renews his argument that the automobile exception does not apply to justify the search in this case. … Brown, 301 Or at 277 . Unfortunately, the lines have not proved to be as clear as the Brown court hoped to make them, and further clarification has been necessary.

Compensation of Button v. State Accident Insurance Fund

45 Or. App. 295 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1980

Francoeur v. SAIF, 20 Or App 604, 611 , 532 P2d 1148 (1975), rev den, 1974. We decline to alter the Board’s decision. … See Moe v. Ceiling Systems, Inc., 44 Or App 429 , 606 P2d 644 (February 11, 1980).

SAIF Corp. v. Kollias

233 Or. App. 499 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 2010

Coleman v. SAIF, 203 Or App 442, 446 , 125 P3d 845 (2005). … See Cole/Dinsmore v. DMV, 336 Or 565, 584 , 87 P3d 1120 (2004) (the proponent of a fact in a contested case hearing has the burden to prove it).

Saif Corp. v. Dunn (In re Comp. of Dunn)

297 Or. App. 206 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 24, 2019

Corp. v. Spurgeon , 109 Or. … The board also cited our opinion in Corkum v. Bi-Mart Corp. , 271 Or.

Godfrey v. Douglas County

28 Or. 446 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1896

In Tompkins v. … In Becker v.

State v. Peterson

309 Or. App. 31 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 2021

State v. … Marvin v.

Domogalla v. Department of Revenue

283 Or. 377 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1978

Mittleman v. Commission, 2 OTR 105 (1965). A taxpayer who disagrees with the value determined by the assessor must petition the Board of Equalization for review. ORS 309.100. … Dept. of Rev., 6 OTR 454 (1976); Co-Operative Security Corp. v. Dept. of Rev., 6 OTR 419 (1976); State Finance Co. etal v. Dept. of Rev., 5 OTR 651 (1974); T & R Service v. Commission, 3 OTR 271 (1968); Mittleman v.

McWhorter v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A.

81 Or. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 1986

by the board. … Defendant argues next that the board ratified the president’s dismissal of plaintiff. That argument is contrary to Wiskotoni v. Michigan Nat.

State v. RATHBONE III

110 Or. App. 414 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 1991

State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434 , 806 P2d 130 , rev dismissed 312 Or 76 , 815 P2d 201 (1991). Defendant specifically notes that he is not seeking to have his convictions “set aside.” … State v. Cook, 108 Or App 576, 580 , 816 P2d 697 (1991).