Case law

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Boone

361 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1972

Briggs v. Spaulding, 141 U.S. 132 , 11 S.Ct. 924 , 35 L.Ed. 662 ; Hoehn v. Crews (C.A. 10 Okla.) 144 F.2d 665 , affirmed; Garber v. Crews, 324 U.S. 200 , 65 S.Ct. 600 , 89 L.Ed. 870 . 4. … Neese v. Brown, Tenn., 405 S.W.2d 577 , 25 A.L. R.3rd 932 at 937. 11.

Lee v. Mehew

8 Okla. 136 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

(City of Olympia v. Stevens, [Wash.] 47 Pac. 11 ; Town of Lemont v. Singer & Tolcott Stone Co., 98 Ill. 94 .) … Under the rulings of this court in Bardrick v. Dillon, supra, and Weber v.

In Re New State Life Ins. Co.

164 Okla. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1933

Brown and H. O. Brown had been released. … Bk. v. Aetna Powder Co. et al., 41 Okla. 394 , 138 P. 392 ; Roxana Pet. Co. v. Covington St. Bk., 132 Okla. 221 , 269 P. 1100 .

Black v. Geissler

58 Okla. 335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1916

Smith v. Board of Com’rs, 26 Okla. 819 , 110 Pac. 669 ; Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co., 32 Okla. 784 , 124 Pac. 324 ; Fast et al. v. Rogers, County Treasurer, 30 Okla. 289 , 119 Pac. 241 ; Harris et al. v. … Smith et al. v. Board Com’rs, 26 Okla. 819 , 110 Pac. 669 ; *344 Fast et al. v. Rogers, 80 Okla. 289 , 119 Pac. 241 ; Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co., 32 Okla. 784 , 124 Pac. 324 ; Turner et al. v.

State v. Sandfer

93 Okla. Crim. 228 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1951

the board. … In Davis v.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Eldredge

67 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1917

Co. v. … Black v. Geissler v. 58 Okla. 335 *112 159 Pac. 1124 ; Huber v. Akers, 66 Okla. 11 , 166 Pac. 892 .

Welch v. Bohart

40 Okla. 439 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1914

Alluwee Oil Co. v. Shufflin et al., 32 Okla. 808 , 124 Pac. 15 ; Fearnow et al. v. Jones et al., 34 Okla. 694 , 126 Pac. 1015 ; Citizens’ Trading Co. v. Bass, 30 Okla. 747 , 120 Pac. 1095 ; Acton v. … Alluwee Oil Co. v.

Hinz v. Hubbard

95 Okla. 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1923

Burns v. Linn, 49 Okla. 326 , 153 Pac. 826 ), the Legislature has not the power to impose upon a charter city any particular form of city government contrary to the provisions of the city charter. … There is some contention that Walton, Mayor, v. Donnelly et al., 83 Okla. 233 , 201 Pac. 367 , supports the contention of the plaintiff in error. We do not think so.

Question Submitted by: Representative Steve Bashore, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 7, Representative Cody Maynard, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 21, Senator David Bullard, Oklahoma Senate, District 6

2025 OK AG 2 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 2025

York v. Turpen , , ¶ 11, , 767; Draper v. State , , ¶ 14, , 1147). B. … See Keating v.

Manning v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

74 O.B.A.J. 1872 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 2003

Abdoo v. State ex rel. Dept. of Pub. Safety, 1990 OK CIV APP 2 , ¶ 11, 788 P.2d 1389, 1393 . ¶ 5 The material facts presented here are not in dispute and therefore this case presents a question of law. Thomas v. … Rhea v. Southwest Cupid, 1998 OK CIV APP 97, ¶ 9 , 969 P.2d 1000, 1002 . DISCUSSION OF ISSUES 1. Did the Trial Court Have Authority to Address the “Approved Device” Issue?

Watkins v. Grieser

11 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1901

(Black on Intoxicating Liquors, s. 162; Stockwell v. Brand, 97 Ind. 474 ; Hill v. Perry, 82 Ind. 28 ; Groscup v. Rainier, 111 Ind. 361 ; Golden v. Bingham,, 61 Ind. 198 .) … As was said in Swan v.

Visteon Corp. v. Yazel

75 O.B.A.J. 1812 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 7, 2004

Co. v. … See Means v. Blevins, 1995 OK 76 , 898 P.2d 1286 ; Dolese Bros. Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Comanche County, 1931 OK 480 , 2 P.2d 955 .

In Re Assessment of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.

175 Okla. 444 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1936

Co. v. Fonville, 36 Okla. 76 , 125 P. 1125 ; Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. Bridges, 37 Okla. 430 , 132 P. 133 ; Leonard v. Showalter, 41 Okla. 122 , 137 P. 346 ; Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. … Lamb et al., 58 Okla. 22 , 158 P. 579 ; Mickleson v. Helm, Same v. Templeton, 89 Okla. 90 , 214 P. 117 .

Westlake v. Cooper

69 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1918

In Board of Trustees of Westminster College v. Piersol, 161 Mo. 271 , 61 S. … Co. v.

In Re Earlsboro Gas Co.'s Assessment

165 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1933

These sections of the statute provide an orderlv method of proceedings of the board and the taxpayer whereby a taxpayer feeling himself aggrieved by the action of the board may, during the session of the board, or within … Its appeal herein to review the action of the State Board of Equalization is, therefore, dismissed. RILEY, O. J., OULLISON. V. C. X, and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, and BUSBY, JJ., concur. BAY-LESS, X, absent.

Johnson v. State

550 P.2d 984 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1976

In the case of Pickens v. … This Court stated in Anderson v.

Clarence L. Boyd Co., Inc. v. Blachly

171 Okla. 626 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1935

Bonsteel v. … In Threadgill et al. v.

Cotton v. Blake

133 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1928

In Carroll v. … This question was settled in Board of Com’rs of Canadian County v. Tinklepaugh, 49 Okla. 440 , 152 Pac. 1119 ; and in Carrico v. Crocker, 38 Okla. 440 , 133 Pac. 181 .

State Ex Rel. City of Mangum v. Greer

188 Okla. 504 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1941

*505 This court has not heretofore decided the question thus presented, although in Tulsa County Excise Board v. … What we have said with reference to those acts of the Legislature in Lowden et al. v. Washita County Excise Board, 186 Okla. 708 , 100 P. 2d 459 , and Tulsa County Excise Board v.

Andrews v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety

320 P.3d 27 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 2013

Safety v. Kelley, 2007 OK CIV APP 99, ¶ 7 , 172 P.3d 231, 234 (citations omitted). See also Justus v. State ex rel. Dep't of Pub. … Comm'rs of Land Office v.