Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

2.14s

  • Fair Share Housing Center, Inc. v. the Zoning Board Of

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 28, 2015

    , v. … THE ZONING BOARD OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, Defendant-Respondent, and 9TH MONROE, LLC, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mayor of Newark v. Bonnell

    57 N.J.L. 424 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1894

    The case of Kean v. Elizabeth, 6 Vroom 351 , is not in point and does not decide-the proposition stated in its syllabus. … For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Bogert, Brown, Green, Smith. 9.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Rall v. Board of Ed. of the City of Bayonne

    104 N.J. Super. 236 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 24, 1969

    Skladzien v. Board of Education, Bayonne, 12 N.J. Misc. 602 ( Sup. Ct. 1934), affirmed, 115 N.J.L. 203 ( E. & A. 1935); Offhouse v. State Board of Education, 131 N.J.L. 391 ( Sup. Ct. 1944); cf. Talty v. … Thornton v. Village of Ridgewood, 17 N.J. 499, 510 (1955); V.F. Zahodiakin Engineering Corp. v. Board of Adjustment, Summit, 8 N.J. 386, 395 (1952).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • RARITAN PARTNERS LLC v. RARITAN TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (L-0021-20, HUNTERDON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 7, 2022

    Moreover, the Board determined that, even if the Planning Board accepted jurisdiction, its "jurisdiction ruling would be erroneous." The Board cited Citizens for Equity v. … The Board is not bound "to accept the testimony of any expert." See Klug v. Bridgewater Twp. Plan. Bd., 407 N.J. Super. 1, 13 (App. Div. 2009); see also Bd. of Educ. of Clifton v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Smith-Pagan v. Board of Review, Department of Human Services

    197 N.J. 258 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 12, 2008

    962 A.2d 530 (2008) 197 N.J. 258 SMITH-PAGAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES. C-471 September Term 2008, 62,933 Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 12, 2008. Petition for certification. Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • KEONA WRIGHT VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 12, 2020

    A-0036-18T1 KEONA WRIGHT, Appellant, v. … See Ardan v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bortel v. Board of Education of Cherry Hill

    95 N.J. Super. 289 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1967

    Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U. S. 74 , 58 S. Ct. 98 , 82 L. Ed. 57 (1937). … Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 2 Cir., 345 F. 2d 336 , affirmed 385 U. S. 589 , 87 S. Ct. 675 , 17 L.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    307 N.J. Super. 560 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 1997

    Coventry Square v. … One v. Board of Adjustment of Twp.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Teaneck Board of Education v. Teaneck Teachers' Ass'n

    91 N.J. 569 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 1982

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shapiro v. Essex County Board of Chosen Freeholders

    91 N.J. 194 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1982

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • West Jersey & Seashore Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    8 N.J. Misc. 212 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 7, 1930

    The board heard all the applications together and decided on a total of thirty-five buses, distributed as above stated. … Reams of paper have been filled with the testimony and' exhibits submitted to the board and briefs of counsel, but the ultimate points for decision are as usual quite simple.. Did the board have jurisdiction?

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McNichol v. Townsend

    73 N.J. Eq. 276 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 30, 1907

    In Master v. Hansford, 4 Ch. Div. 718, 724, and again in Renals v. Cowlishaw, 9 Ch. … Mulligan v. Jordan, 50 N. J. Eq. (5 Dick.) 363, 364, 365; Leaver v. Gorman, ante p. 129.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • St. Joseph's Korean Catholic Church v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    191 N.J. 308 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 8, 2007

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clear Television Cable Corp. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    162 N.J. Super. 84 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 30, 1978

    In Clear Television Cable Corporation [hereinafter "Clear”] v. … In National Video Systems, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • DYKEMAN v. L.L. BROWN

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 8, 2019

    BROWN, et al., Defendants. … On February 2, 2018, this Court permitted that claim to proceed against Defendants Brown and Bonds. (ECF No. 11).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marlyn Realty Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    6 N.J. Misc. 581 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1928

    Burg v. Ackerman, 5 Id. 96. There is also a presumption that the action of the board of adjustment was right. Silvester v. Princeton, 5 N. J. Adv. R. 1801. … This court will not distrub the action of the board of adjustment unless its action is shown by evidence to be wrong. Oxford Construction Co. v. Orange, 137 Atl. Rep. 545 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. Johnson & Johnson

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 19, 2019

    : ____________________________________: EDNA BROWN, : Civ. … o l v i n g I m e r y s h a v e b e e n stayed by the automatic stay. 2 Because the complaints in all these cases are substantially similar, I will only cite the Brown Complaint.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • National Broadcasting Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com'rs

    25 F. Supp. 761 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 23, 1938

    Plaintiff declined to comply with the request of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners on the grounds that it already had the approval and authorization of the Federal Communications Commission, that the defendant-board … They admit that broadcasting constitutes interstate commerce as to transmission and reception when the radius extends beyond state lines, United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Lehigh Valley Terminal Railway Co.

    55 N.J.L. 203 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1893

    The-controversy in this case is over the strip-of land belonging to the city through which the Brown place sewer was in part constructed, and which the city, by a resolution passed by the board of street and water commissioners … The facts are set out in the opinion in the case of Jersey City v. The National Docks Ry. Co., supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Menlo Park Plaza v. PLANNING BOARD OF TP. OF WOODBRIDGE

    316 N.J. Super. 451 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 4, 1998

    Kramer v. Board of Adj. of Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 296 , 212 A. 2d 153 (1965); Medical Realty v. Board of Adj. of the City of Summit, 228 N.J.Super. 226, 233 , 549 A. 2d 469 (App.Div. 1988). … See Nash v. Board of Adj. of Twp. of Morris, 96 N.J. 97, 102 , 474 A. 2d 241 (1984).

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.