Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

5,409 results

2.78s

  • Thurmond v. State

    57 Okla. Crim. 388 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1935

    Morris, the duly qualified and acting county attorney in and for Oklahoma county, State of Oklahoma, and on his official oath gives the district court in and for said Oklahoma county and the State of Oklahoma, to know and … The purpose of the questions clearly was to keep persistently before the jury the assumption of damaging facts which could not be proven, and thus impress upon their minds the probability of the existence of the assumed facts

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Huang

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 12, 2026

    Under § 1225(b)(2)(A), “in the case of an alien who is an applicant for admission, if the examining immigration officer determines that an alien seeking admission is not clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted … And while a noncitizen arrested in the Midwest might qualify as “an alien present in the United States who had not been admitted,” § 1225(a)(1), the mandatory detention provision upon which Defendants rely, limits its

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Royer v. Social Security Administration

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 29, 2023

    Standard of Review The Social Security Act (Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability. … Although portions of the plaintiffs argument are poorly organized and sparse in citation to the well-established legal requirements that apply, the plaintiff's brief clearly sets forth an argument that the

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Valero v. Social Security Administration

    District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Aug 21, 2023

    The Court is again perplexed by Plaintiff’s argument because it is clearly belied by the record. … Servs., 961 F.2d 1495, 1499 (10th Cir. 1992) (“[a claimant’s] testimony alone cannot establish a nonexertional impairment”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Irving v. Social Security Administration

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 16, 2023

    Standard of Review The Social Security Act (the Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability. … At step two, the claimant must establish an impairment or combination of impairments that is severe. See Lax, 489 F.3d at 1084.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ball v. Social Security Administration

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2022

    Standard of Review The Social Security Act (the Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability … Thus, the period between plaintiff’s alleged December 31, 2011 onset date and her DLI establishes a one-day relevant period by which plaintiff must establish disability. (See R. 16-17).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Bartmann

    320 B.R. 725 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jul 14, 2004

    The undisputed facts establish that Mr. … These services were clearly rendered in contemplation of the Bartmanns' bankruptcy. 19 . Although Mr.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sanders v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.

    676 F. Supp. 2d 1271 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 28, 2009

    . # 359, at 18 (Corporate HR established the guidelines and communicated those to the local business units). McNeely described the MSGs as “overarching guidelines” for the Fall 2002 RIF. … Wooten also testified that he told Sanders that she might be able to return to C & E in the future if a position for which she was qualified opened up. 16 Id. *1288 110.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cowan v. Social Security Administration

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 5, 2024

    Standard of Review The Social Security Act (Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability. … Under agency regulations, the ALJ’s decision must give “specific reasons for the weight given to the individual’s symptoms, be consistent with and supported by the evidence, and be clearly articulated so the

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Osage Wind, LLC

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 18, 2024

    To establish an entitlement to treble damages, a Plaintiff must demonstrate ejectment through an active force by the trespasser. Ansay, 450 F.2d at 436. … At the time of negotiating the Surface Leases, Defendants clearly believed that the wind farm could be removed from the surface estate within 12 months.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williamson v. Reynolds

    904 F. Supp. 1529 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1995

    Walker herself stated her facility was not qualified to adequately assess Petitioner’s condition. Another letter also written by Ms. … Petitioner’s case is clearly distinguishable. In Little v.

    Disapproved on other grounds by Nguyen v. Reynolds, 131 F.3d 1340 (1997)Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Tilley

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 25, 2026

    Id. ¶ 54.2 Plaintiff also alleges that Wahlgren acted “in conformity with and pursuant to the practices and policies established by [defendant], both through [defendant’s] own example . . . and in conformance with the established … The fact that plaintiff’s legs were immobile is not clearly a result of any injury, rather than the simple fact that he was restrained.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gould v. Liebl-Weaver

    United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 16, 2024

    several were not for Debtor, and a review of Defendants Exhibit 5 reveals a number are clearly associated with other jobs and not Debtor. … However, Great White Bison clearly stated it never handled or diagnosed the phones or computer system.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ni Fuel Co., Inc. v. Jackson

    257 B.R. 600 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 1, 2000

    Each case clearly involves some claims which are not core and not related to the bankruptcy. … In addition, the remaining claims do not appear to qualify as “arising in” a bankruptcy case because the causes of action can exist outside of the bankruptcy action. 16 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Simons v. McDaniel

    154 Okla. 168 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1932

    In either event the right to drill is restricted to the term of the lease as established by the habendum clause. … The latter alternative is becoming an established custom in the business.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • IN RE ADOPTION OF 2019 REVISIONS TO OKLAHOMA JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CRIMINAL (2D)

    2019 OK CR 28 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 2019

    Committee Comments The elements of second-degree burglary are presented clearly by the statute. … Third, the common law definition is to be followed, in the opinion of the Commission, unless the Legislature has clearly indicated otherwise.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cline v. Sunoco, Inc. (R&M)

    District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Oct 3, 2019

    The PRSA clearly states that “a first purchaser or holder of proceeds who fails to remit proceeds from the sale of oil or gas production to owners legally entitled thereto within the time limitations ... … The Court also finds that class counsel qualifies as experienced in class actions and other complex civil litigation, and Sunoco does not argue otherwise.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Singh

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 3, 2026

    And while a noncitizen arrested in the Midwest might qualify as “an alien present in the United States who had not been admitted,” § 1225(a)(1), the mandatory detention provision upon which Defendants rely, limits its … After all, “the facts clearly demonstrate that [the petitioner] was entitled to more process than he received pursuant to § 1226(a) and its implementing regulations.”) (first quoting Garcia Cortes v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Coats v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 11, 2019

    The Campos court concluded that it would consider Plaintiff to have met the full-time requirement if she can provide a reasonable calculation method establishing that she worked in excess of 30 hours in any “regular work … Moreover, Krueger’s response to Wright’s June 2, 2015, inquiry clearly stated that Plaintiff’s hourly rate was “$52.7361 hourly, plus a separate night shift differential rate of $5.00 hourly for hours worked between 1900

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Anderson v. Boeing Co.

    222 F.R.D. 521 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 29, 2004

    Rule 702 provides: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience … Boeing also argues that Siskin’s analyses do not speak “clearly and directly to an issue in dispute in the ease.” Id. at 6, citing Daubert v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.