Case law

Montgomery County v. Fraternal Order of Police

222 Md. App. 278 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Apr 3, 2015

In the court’s view, they are entitled to at least “qualified immunity” to the extent the plaintiffs seeks to hold them personally liable. … “If the law at the time was not clearly established, an official could not reasonably be expected to anticipate subsequent legal developments, nor could he fairly be said to ‘know’ that the law forbade

Alvarez v. Corizon Health, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland · Jun 7, 2024

immunity. … Eleventh Amendment Immunity Under the Eleventh Amendment of the United States Constitution, a state, its agencies, and its departments are immune from citizen suits in federal

Medsense, LLC v. University System of Maryland

District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 27, 2019

Here, in establishing USM, the Maryland legislature specifically defined it as an “instrumentality of the State,” governing “constituent institutions” of higher education. Md. … Section 13.08 clearly states that it is the Licensee who is the party consenting to this Court’s jurisdiction. See J.R. 027, “2013 Exclusive License Agreement.”

Edwards v. State

198 Md. 132 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 15, 1951

Testimony to identify the weapon from which a shot was fired is admissible where it is shown that the witness offering such testimony is qualified by training and experience to give expert opinion on firearms-and ammunition … The principal witnesses against him were three co-conspirators, who had been promised immunity in return for their testimony.

Duckworth v. State Board of Elections

213 F. Supp. 2d 543 · District Court, D. Maryland · Aug 5, 2002

Thereafter, the Governor established a five-member Redistricting Advisory Committee to formulate the 2002 redistricting plan. Id. ¶ 13 . … Accordingly, I need not and do not reach defendants’ arguments based on sovereign immunity or laches. I explain. IV. A.

In the Matter of Meddings

244 Md. App. 204 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Dec 23, 2019

After a show cause hearing, Wolfe was granted an order establishing an interlocutory lien against Maryland National Golf. Id. … From this review of case law, we confirm an established principle of appellate review: a trial court’s factual findings will be reviewed for clear error.

Hardy v. Hardy

79 Md. 9 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 13, 1894

We then have the admission of the contesting defendant that, in 1863, the intestate did owe the appellant for services and paid him the sum of $1000 therefor; if it he true, and we *14 think the testimony clearly establishes … The charge of thirty dollars for money loaned is also clearly established. But from a careful consideration of all the proof, we do not think the appellant ought to he allowed interest.

Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Mgmt., Inc.

285 F.R.D. 350 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jun 27, 2012

When “good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only a part of a matter, the answer [to the request for admission] must specify the part admitted and qualify or deny the rest.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 36(a)(4). … Where “good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only part of a matter,” the answer to the request for admission must specify what is admitted and what is qualified or denied. Fed.R.Civ.P. 36(a)(4).

Janey v. State

166 Md. App. 645 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 31, 2006

Janey’s disappearance if Jones were granted immunity. After arrangements were made that were satisfactory to Jones and his attorney, Jones led police to the grave containing Mrs. … State, 58 Md.App. 626 , 636 n. 3, 473 A.2d 1329 (accessory after fact does not qualify as accomplice), cert. denied, 300 Md. 795 , 481 A.2d 240 (1984).

In Re Maurice M.

314 Md. 391 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 19, 1988

in the hands of the client and retained that immunity in the hands of the attorney. … It is difficult to establish and cannot be inferred from a silent record. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 525-26 , 92 S.Ct. 2182, 2189-90 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972).

Dart Drug Corp. v. Hechinger Co.

272 Md. 15 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 3, 1974

to conduct business for labor or profit in the usual manner and location or to operate its establishment in any manner for the general public. … This was clearly consonant with the Maryland Rules. Rule 320 a 4 provides: “4. Defects Disregarded.

Chesson v. Montgomery Mutual Insurance

434 Md. 346 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Sep 24, 2013

Through blood testing, he would test for: the presence of one of “fifty-four kinds of immune responses genotype, called HLA,” a “reduction of an inflammation preventing hormone called ... … Hung Cheung, who was qualified as an expert in internal medicine, occupational medicine, environmental medicine, toxicology, and indoor air quality. Dr. Cheung testified that Dr.

Claybourne v. State

209 Md. App. 706 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Feb 28, 2013

Gibbs’ inconsistencies was clearly admissible for the purpose of rehabilitating her credibility. Washington, 293 Md. at 469 , 445 A.2d 684 . … Southall ("Dr.Southall”), the State’s qualified expert in forensic pathology, performed the autopsy on Mr. Thompson. She noted that Mr.

Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Sibley

194 F. Supp. 3d 392 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 13, 2016

A cursory review of Exhibit 2 clearly shows that the disclosure of Sibley’s social security number was inadvertent. … Fire Ins Co., 639 So.2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994) (holding “that absolute immunity must be afforded to any act occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding, regardless of whether the act involves a defamatory statement

Tri-State Truck & Equipment Co. v. Stauffer

24 Md. App. 221 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 13, 1975

The charge itself clearly so limited the effective influence of § H7. … The purpose of licensing operators of automobiles is to make it reasonably certain that the licensee is qualified for the task and a proper person to be licensed. G. L. c. 90, §§ 8, 10.

Mills v. State

310 Md. 33 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 25, 1987

Accordingly, the present contention of error in the admission of the State’s Exhibit 9, showing the face and chest of the victim, was clearly waived. See Rule 4-322. … United States, 333 U.S. 740, 746-749 , 68 S.Ct. 880 , 92 L.Ed. 1055 (1948), a statute provided that the jury in a murder case could qualify its verdict by adding “without capital punishment,” that if the jury so qualified

Chesapeake Bay Found. v. CREG Westport I

481 Md. 325 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 26, 2022

A forest stand delineation and forest conservation plan must be prepared by a Maryland licensed forester, a Maryland licensed landscape architect, or other qualified professional.8 On a property with significant … Following approval of the forest stand delineation, the applicant must arrange for a qualified professional to prepare a proposed forest conservation plan. NR § 5-1605(b).

In re 2012 Legislative Districting of the State

436 Md. 121 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 10, 2013

That could only be accomplished by establishing a multi-county district. … Walker, 238 Md. 512, 520 , 209 A.2d 555 (1965)) (“[N]o matter how highly qualified the expert may be in his field, his opinion has no probative force unless a sufficient factual basis to support a rational conclusion is shown

Gray v. Metts

203 F. Supp. 2d 426 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 20, 2002

. § 1400 et seq. and qualified as a handicapped individual under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 . After an administrative due process hearing, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Ann C. … “A plaintiff seeking summary judgment on an issue ... bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case that would entitle the movant to a directed verdict if the issue was uncontested at trial.” Orozco v.

Maryland v. Universal Elections, Inc.

862 F. Supp. 2d 457 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 29, 2012

, individual, or other entity initiating the call, and (ii) shall, during or after the message, state clearly the telephone number or address of such business, other entity, or individual.] … Russell was given immunity in the state criminal case. On May 11, 2012, Henson was acquitted of one count of election fraud and two counts of conspiracy to violate Maryland state election laws.