Case law

Retail Clerks Local Union No. 381, Affiliated With the Retail Clerks International Associations, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Industrial Conference Board and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Industrial Conference Board and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association

348 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1965

INDUSTRIAL CONFERENCE BOARD and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Brown et al., 85 S.Ct. 980 , the order of the Board insofar as applicable to No. 17790 is modified by deleting therefrom in paragraph 1(a) the requirement that the employers involved cease and desist from 'engaging in a lock-out

Bennett v. Ridley

633 A.2d 824 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1993

But, the statutory language does not explicitly require that the Parole Board vote occur at a Board meeting. See J. Parreco & Son v. Rental Housing Comm’n, 567 A.2d 43, 46 (D.C.1989); Peoples Drug Stores v. … v.

Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

234 F. Supp. 698 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 20, 1964

Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, 260 F.2d 431 , C.A.3d. . Sperry Rand Corp. v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, 272 F.2d 29 , C.A.2d. . Hadjipateras v. Pacific, S.A., 290 F.2d 697 , C.A.5th. . Houston Fearless Corp. v.

United States Overseas Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc., Intervenor

222 F.2d 303 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1955

In Air Transport Associates, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, No. 11118, and in Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. … Air Transport Associates, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1952, 344 U.S. 825 , 73 S.Ct. 25 , 97 L.Ed. 642 ; Chicago. & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v.

Highway Truck Drivers and Helpers v. National Labor Relations Board

302 F.2d 897 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 21, 1962

302 F.2d 897 HIGHWAY TRUCK DRIVERS AND HELPERS, LOCAL 107, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 16429. … Local 1424, International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO v. N. L. R. B.

Frederick B. Pfister v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

675 F.2d 1314 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 23, 1982

Walton Manufacturing Co., 369 U.S. 404, 408 , 82 S.Ct. 853, 855 , 7 L.Ed.2d 829 (1962); O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508-509 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951). … Pfister v. Benefits Review Board, No. 80-1081 (D.C.Cir. March 11, 1982) (order denying motion for disqualification).

Granfield v. Catholic University of America

530 F.2d 1035 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 1976

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 566, n. 1 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2703 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). . … Provident Tradesmens Bank and Trust Co. v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102, 111 , 88 S.Ct. 733 , 19 L.Ed.2d 936 (1968); Brown v. Christman, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 203 , 126 F.2d 625, 631-632 (1942); Boles v.

Local Union No. 519, United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices v. National Labor Relations Board

416 F.2d 1120 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 11, 1969

Ill, 1965-67); Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. NLRB, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 275 , 371 F.2d 740 (1966) ; International Union UAW v. NLRB, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 196 , 392 F.2d 801 (1967); Braniff Airways, Inc. v. … Meadowmoor Dairies, 312 U.S. 287 , 61 S.Ct. 552 , 85 L.Ed 836 (1941); NLRB v. Local 3, IBEW, 317 F.2d 193 (2d Cir. 1963); Dunn v.

Lugo v. U.S. Department of Justice

214 F. Supp. 3d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2016

Browning v. Clinton, 292 *37 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Allen v. Thompson, 815 F.2d 1438 , 1434 (11th Cir. 1987); see also Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 750 (9th Cir. 2009); Pinaud v. Cty. of Suffolk, 52 F.3d 1139 , 1149-50 (2d Cir. 1995); Johnson v.

Idea Public Charter School v. District of Columbia

374 F. Supp. 2d 158 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2005

Because the parents in Yates had reserved the right to pursue a claim against the school board following the board’s decision not to place the child in a private school, the court held that the board need not wait for the … Brown v. Duchesne, 60 U.S. 183, 194 , 19 How. 183 , 15 L.Ed. 595 (1856); See also Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 568 , 115 S.Ct. 1061 , 131 L.Ed.2d 1 (1995).

Local No. 627, International Union of Operating Engineers v. National Labor Relations Board

518 F.2d 1040 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 8, 1975

Local 1912, International Association of Machinists v. … Eng. v. NLRB, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 294, 297 , 480 F.2d 1186, 1189 (1973). . What this court said in Greater Boston Television Corp. v. F. C.

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Disston Division-Danville Works v. National Labor Relations Board

363 F.2d 272 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 10, 1966

363 F.2d 272 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., DISSTON DIVISION-DANVILLE WORKS, Petitioner, v. … Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 326 U.S. 376, 398 , 66 S.Ct. 203, 216 , 90 L.Ed. 145 (1945)

Building Material & Construction Teamsters Union Local No. 216 v. National Labor Relations Board

520 F.2d 172 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1975

See Enterprise Ass’n, Local 638 v. N.L. R.B., No. 73-1764, 172 U.S.App.D.C. -, 521 F.2d 885 , decided July 1, 1975; Meat & Highway Drivers, Local 710 v. … As the Supreme Court said in N.L.R.B. v.

JAMARR MEDLEY ANTOINE RICHARDSON and LUCIOUS MCLEOD v. UNITED STATES

104 A.3d 115 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2014

Catlett v. … Scott v.

Air Line Pilots Association International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc. Air Line Dispatchers' Association v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc.

502 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 1974

P 10,315 AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, American Airlines, Inc., et al. AIR LINE DISPATCHERS' ASSOCIATION et al., Petitioners, v. … National Aviation Trades Ass'n v.

Association of American Railroads v. United States Department of Transportation

821 F.3d 19 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 29, 2016

Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge and WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judges. … Opinion of the Court by Circuit Judge BROWN: BROWN, Circuit Judge: With the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970, Congress created Amtrak, a for-profit corporation indirectly controlled by the President of the United

Blodgett v. University Club

930 A.2d 210 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2007

v. … Thus, it is widely accepted that members of a board considering disciplinary charges may have prior involvement in the case. See Adkins v.

Satterlee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

195 F. Supp. 3d 327 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 5, 2016

See Kowal, 16 F.3d at 1276; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Elastic Stop Nut Division of Harvard Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

921 F.2d 1275 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1990

NLRB v. Bausch and Lomb, Inc., 526 F.2d 817, 821 (2d Cir.1975). The question for the Board to consider is “whether the employer’s actions are motivated by anti-union considerations.” Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. … As we have previously noted, “the critical inquiry is whether the objections made before the Board were adequate to put the Board on notice that the issue might be pursued on appeal.” Consolidated Freightways v.

Bechman v. Southgate

28 App. D.C. 405 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1906

The case will probably have to be taken to the Board of Examiners-in-Chief, and must be appealed before Aug. 13, 1903.” … Stone v. Pupin, 19 App. D. C. 396, 400; Schupphaus v. Stevens, 17 App. D. C. 548, 555 ; Ostergren v. Tripler, 17 App. D. C. 557, 559; Luger v. Browning, 21 App. D. C. 201, 204; Herman v. Fullman, 23 App. D.