Case law

Vida v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 23, 2021

Agency Proceedings The Social Security Act (the Act) provides disability insurance benefits to qualifying individuals who have a physical or mental disability. … (“Clearly, an ALJ doesn’t commit error by omitting limitations not supported by the record”); Arles v. Astrue, 438 Fed. App’x 735, 740 (10th Cir. 2011).

IN THE MATTER OF: M.R.

2024 OK 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 2024

Mother contends that M.R. did not have any physical damage and therefore the State did not meet its burden of establishing heinous and shocking abuse. Dr. … Here the grounds found in § 1-4-809 were clearly established in the order, regardless if the box was not checked. Further, paragraphs 2 and 3 of 10A O.S. § 1-4-707(C) are both conditional determinations.

Meashintubby v. Paulk

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Jan 30, 2023

Oklahoma,8 the Supreme Court held that a large area in eastern Oklahoma that was historically part of the Creek Nation, under an 1833 treaty, qualifies as “Indian country” under § 1151.9 The Oklahoma Criminal Court of … “[A]n injunction is clearly a form of equitable relief barred by the TIA.”25 And there 25 Direct Mktg. Ass’n v. Brohl, 575 U.S. 1, 7 (2015).

Mukhammadjon Makhmudov v. Pamela Bondi, et al.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 3, 2026

But while Petitioner may qualify as an “applicant for admission,” that alone does not make Petitioner “an alien seeking admission.” See Escarcega v. Olson, No. CIV-25-1129-J, 2025 WL 3243438, at *2 (W.D. Okla. … That is, because an alien present in the United States without admittance would be unlikely to prove that they are ‘clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted,’ ICE would never need to rely on § 1226(c)(1)(E)

Rawal

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 21, 2026

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals is in agreement, ruling that “while a noncitizen arrested in the Midwest might qualify as ‘an alien present in the United States who had not been admitted,’ § 1225(a)(1), … The Government Should Be Required To Establish Flight and/or Dangerousness By Clear and Convincing Evidence.

Haskell v. Kennedy

151 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1931

Walter Gray: To which the defendants object for the reason that this witness is not shown qualified to answer this question; and the question is wholly incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial. … This and the next instruction clearly call into prominence things calculated to arouse prejudice.

Cresap v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 2, 2022

Colvin, 727 F.3d 1061, 1074 (10th Cir. 2013) (“The Commissioner need not establish that a prior job exists in significant numbers in the national economy. . . .”). … Plaintiff’s Job as a Housekeeping Cleaner Qualifies as Past Relevant Work.

Lillard v. Stockton

267 F. Supp. 2d 1081 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 16, 2003

In the agreement, Plaintiffs warranted that they were “accredited investors,” as defined in Regulation D in the 1933 Act; that they were qualified purchasers, defined by the Investment Company Act; and that they met all suitability … At this stage of the proceedings, no facts have been established for the record.

Cox v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

197 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1946

Cas. 1918E, 81; English on Interpretation of Statutes, par. 414, or, more aptly stated, “by what is known as the doctrine of ‘last antecedent’, relative and qualifying words, phrases, and clauses are to be applied to the … The Referendum Act was clearly designed as one of suppression and not of supervision. It relaxed merely the alcoholic content of those things capable of being used as a beverage.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEY

2023 OK 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 2023

The panel found the allegations on all counts to be established and recommended respondent be suspended for the practice of law for two years and one day. … Collins clearly had an impression respondent could influence the prosecutors.

Veit

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 15, 2026

;‘extrinsic evidence of fraudulent intent is required to establish fraud.’”38 A debtor’s 32 Rosen v. … Plaintiffs clearly believe that Defendant should have characterized her debts as primarily consumer debts, and that her failure to do so was a knowing, fraudulent, and material false oath.

Obed Saul Barragan Reyes - Adversary Proceeding

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 15, 2020

However, it is well established that the issuance of a “bad check” is insufficient, on its own, to establish that the debt is non- dischargeable. KC Coring & Cutting Construction, Inc. v. … In the present case, it is undisputed that there clearly were such representations. F.

Kirtley, Trustee v. Mabrey Bank

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Apr 28, 2022

Del. 2011) (“The established case law is clear that a debtor may grant a security interest in collateral that the debtor does not actually own if the owner of such collateral consents to such an arrangement.”), aff’d, 476 … Judge Nugent correctly found that an owner/member of an LLC had no rights in the specific property owned by the LLC that would qualify as “rights in collateral” under the Kansas version of § 9-203 of the UCC.19 Clinkingbeard

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEY

2023 OK 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 2023

The panel found the allegations on all counts to be established and recommended respondent be suspended for the practice of law for two years and one day. … Collins clearly had an impression respondent could influence the prosecutors.

STATE ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON

499 P.3d 719 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 2021

It must be clearly and plainly expressed.") … Officers Cite Name Level 51 O.S. 1 , Beginning of Term - Time of Qualifying Cited Title 63.

Muller v. McCann

50 Okla. 710 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1915

Jones as three disinterested householders of said McAlester township to appraise said property, who on the 4th day of September, 1909, qualified as such appraisers, and on said date made a return of their appraisement on … We simply pass upon the case as presented to us by the petition and demurrers, which to our mind clearly present a case in which the plaintiff is entitled to be heard upon its merits.

Thomas L Pearson and the Pearson Family Members Foundation, The v. University of Chicago, The

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2023

Accordingly, the court denies the University’s motion with respect to Plaintiffs’ claim that the University breached the Grant Agreement by failing to hire qualified faculty. 2. … These uncontroverted material facts establish that the University complied with its obligation under Article 3 of the Grant Agreement to appoint a qualified Institute Director prior to September 1, 2016.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Pacenza

136 P.3d 616 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 2006

Rule 1.3, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A clearly provides that a lawyer committing any act contrary to prescribed standards of conduct, whether in the course of professional capacity … paperwork on the place during the repossession and had brought the title opinion up to date and everything was current and he was a real estate attorney and he would take care of everything with the house and he was very qualified

DON KEENAN v. TODD RUSS, in his capacity as the Treasurer of the State of Oklahoma

2026 OK 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 2026

." ¶27 Appellate review of an order granting a preliminary injunction examines whether an abuse of discretion occurred, "when a decision is clearly against the weight of the evidence, contrary to law, or contrary to established … Not later than the ninetieth day after the date the financial company receives notice under paragraph 1 of this subsection, the financial company shall cease boycotting energy companies to avoid qualifying for divestment

Richter v. Nelson

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 17, 2024

Hatfield, Pitts, Lowery, and other named defendants opposed the amendment, arguing that OKDHS could not be added as a party because it was immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. … CONCLUSION Plaintiff’s arguments pursuant to both Rule 59 and Rule 60 fail to establish a basis for relief.