Case law

Randall B. Coward v. Blount County

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 29, 2001

See Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997); Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central South, 816 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tenn. 1991). … As this Court noted in Smith v. Harriman Utility Board, 26 S.W.2d 879 (Tenn. Ct.

State of Tennessee v. Pedro Ignacio Hernandez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 29, 2014

Brown and the interpreter. … See State v. Johnson, 53 S.W.3d 628, 630 (Tenn. 2001); State v. Kendrick, 38 S.W.3d 566, 568 (Tenn. 2001); State v. Brown, 992 S.W.2d 389, 391 (Tenn. 1999); State v. Walton, 958 S.W.2d 724, 727 (Tenn. 1997).

State ex rel. McGhee v. John

837 S.W.2d 596 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1992

Its earlier history can be traced in McGhee v. Miller, 753 S.W.2d 354 (Tenn.1988) (McGhee I), and McGhee v. Miller, 785 S.W.2d 817 (Tenn.1990) (McGhee II). … Those damages are to be measured by the standard set out in *602 Frye v. Memphis State University, 806 S.W.2d 170 (Tenn.1991), involving the wrongful discharge of a tenured university professor.

Eldridge Hill v. State of Tennessee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 14, 2010

Seizing his chance, Brown fled out the door and down a hill, followed by the defendant who shouted, “Shoot him” as he ran out the door after Brown. … And just as in [State v.

State v. Daniel

12 S.W.3d 420 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 31, 2000

Royer, 460 U.S. at 497 , 103 S.Ct. at 1324 ; see also Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434 , 111 S.Ct. at 2386 ; Delgado, 466 U.S. at 216-17 , 104 S.Ct. at 1762-63 ; Brown v. … Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655 , 81 S.Ct. 1684, 1691 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961). . The concurring opinion asserts that under Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979) and Hughes v.

Ford v. Wells

347 F. Supp. 1026 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 18, 1972

As said by the Supreme Court in Pierson [v. … Jack Brown. When Mr. Brown appeared at the preliminary hearing for Mr. Ford afterward, Mr. Brown was arrested for interfering with an officer in the performance of his duty. This charge against Mr.

In Re Brigance

219 B.R. 486 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 13, 1998

In State of Mississippi v. … (citing Bell v. Tindall, 215 Miss. 343 , 60 So.2d 801, 804 (1952) and Evans v. National Bank of Savannah, 251 U.S. 108, 113-14 , 40 S.Ct. 58, 59-60 , 64 L.Ed. 171 (1919)). In Miller v.

Central Woodwork, Inc. v. Cheyenne Johnson, Shelby County Assessor of Property

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 24, 2015

See Lind v. Beaman Dodge, Inc., 356 S.W.3d 889, 895 (Tenn. 2011); Mills v. Fulmarque, 360 S.W.3d 362, 366 (Tenn. 2012). … Lipscomb v. Doe, 32 S.W.3d 840, 844 (Tenn. 2000).

Jenkins, Dennis v. TYSON FOODS, INC.

2024 TN WC 80 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 25, 2024

In Carrillo v. Hurtado, TN Wrk. 1 Tyson offered a letter from the authorized physician denying causation as an exhibit at the hearing. 1 Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Headrick v. Union Carbide Corp.

825 S.W.2d 424 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 26, 1991

Vance v. Schulder, 547 S.W.2d 927 (Tenn.1977), citing Brown v. Dunstan, 219 Tenn. 291 , 409 S.W.2d 365 (1966). … In Brown v.

State v. John Cote and Sarah Cote, In Re: Dr. Sandra Elkins

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 28, 2010

In United States v. … See People v. Foggy, 521 N.E.2d 86 (1988) and Commonwealth v.

State of Tennessee v. Savannah Humphrey

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 19, 2017

State v. Wagner, 382 S.W.3d 289, 297 (Tenn. 2012) (quoting State v. Campbell, 245 S.W.3d 331, 335 (Tenn. 2008)). … State v. Dorantes, 331 S.W.3d 370, 379 (Tenn. 2011); State v. Hanson, 279 S.W.3d 265, 275 (Tenn. 2009).

Co-Operative Stores Co. v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co.

137 Tenn. 609 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1917

In Murphy v. Southern L. Ins. Co., 62 Tenn., 440 , 27 Am. Rep., 761 , W. Matt Brown was local agent of the company at 'Nashville, Tenn., where the policy was issued and where the assured lived and died. … This sum of $11 had been paid to Brown, local agent at Nashville. Brown from time to time called upon Murphy to pay the balance of this premium, but he failed to do it.

Goodwin, Charles R. v. Morristown Drivers Services, Inc.

2019 TN WC 119 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 2, 2019

GOODWIN, ) Docket No. 2017-03-1235 Employee, ) v. ) MORRISTOWN DRIVERS ) SERVICES, INC., … To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Cawthron v. Scott

217 Tenn. 668 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1966

Both appealed to the Board of Review. … Milne Chair Company v. Hake, 190 Tenn. 395 , 230 S.W.2d 393 (1950); Moore v. Commissioner of Employment Security, 197 Tenn. 444 , 273 S.W.2d 703 (1954); Aluminum Company of America v.

Coke v. United Transportation Union

552 S.W.2d 402 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 1, 1977

In Hennekes v. Maupin (1963), 119 Ohio App. 9 , 192 N.E.2d 204 , and Boblitt et a 1. v. Cleveland, Cincinnati and St. L. Ry. … The same principle is also recognized in the Tennessee cases of Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association v. Cox, 221 Tenn. 164 , 425 S.W.2d 597 (1967), and Murray v.

State of Tennessee v. Albert Fitzgerald Turner

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 1, 2005

The Defendant testified that he was on the Board of Habitat for Humanity in his new community and that he was a “business owner” there. … State v. Schindler, 986 S.W.2d 209, 211 (Tenn. 1999).

Austin Davis v. Covenant Presbyterian Church of Nashville

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 30, 2015

Hibdon v. Grabowski, 195 S.W.3d 48, 58 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). The basis for a claim for defamation “„is that the defamation has resulted in an injury to the person‟s character and reputation.‟” Brown v. … See Brown, 393 S.W.3d at 703.

Penny Parker v. Mike Lowery, etc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 26, 2013

Blackburn v. Blackburn, 270 S.W.3d 42, 47 (Tenn. 2008); Union Carbide Corp. v. Huddleston, 854 S.W.2d 87, 91 (Tenn. 1993). … Conversely, she may not be held personally responsible for the Board’s actions because the duties of the Board “are imposed on the entire board and not on individual members.” State ex rel. Thompson v.

Keith v. Beasley

177 Tenn. 652 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1941

But, as pointed out in Townsend v. Ray, supra, the fact that both boards perform substantially the same duties is not controlling. The same argument was advanced in State ex rel, Linkous v. Morris, supra; Goetz v. … W. 417, 420 ; Haggard v. Gallien, supra; Caldwell v. Lyon, supra; and numerous other cases. But, as stated by Chief Justice Creen in Goetz v.