Case law

Thurston v. State Accident Insurance Fund

7 Or. App. 273 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 1971

* * *” While, as Beaudry v. … The proceedings, both at the administrative and judicial level, which gave rise to this appeal took place prior to Lawton v. SAIF, 5 Or App 539 , 485 P2d 1104 (1971), and Johnson v.

Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.

258 Or. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 11, 2013

Claimant sought judicial review, and this court held that the board could assess a separate penalty for each unreasonable refusal to close the claim. Cayton v. … Cayton v.

Lawton v. State Accident Insurance Fund

5 Or. App. 539 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 1971

The findings of a medical board of review are final and binding. ORS 656.814. ① No appeal lies from them. Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood Co., 255 Or 503 , 469 P2d 25 (1970); Sowell v. Workmen’s Comp. … Sowell v. Workmen’s Comp. Bd., supra, dealt with a problem similar to the one in the ease at hand. There, this court said: “The medical review board did not adequately answer the questions which it had a duty to answer.

Luckhurst v. Bank of America

167 Or. App. 11 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 3, 2000

On review, the Board reversed. … Simplot Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 321 Or 253, 261 , 897 P2d 316 (1995) (the court may not narrow the broad ordinary meaning of a. statutory term when the text and context do not justify the limitation).

SAIF Corp. v. Lewis

335 Or. 92 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2002

SAIF v. Lewis, 170 Or App 201, 215 , 12 P3d 498 (2000). Claimant seeks review of the Court of Appeals’ decision. We reverse. … SAIF v.

Riggs v. Polk County

51 Or. 509 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1908

RIGGS v. POLK COUNTY. [95 Pac. 5.] Corporations — Members — Meetings — Calling Meetings — Persons Making Call. 1. … school board.

White v. Gladden

209 Or. 53 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1956

United States v. Cummings, 2d Cir 1956, 233 F2d 187; Weber v. Squier, 124 F2d 618, cert den 315 US 810 , 86 L ed 1209; Van Meter v. … Weber v. Squier, 1942, 315 U.S. 810 , 62 S.Ct. 800 , 86 L.Ed. 1209 ; McNally v. Hill, 1934, 293 U.S. 131, 138 , 55 S.Ct. 24 , 79 L.Ed. 238 ; Van Meter v. Sanford, 5 Cir., 1938, 99 F.2d 511 ; Witte v.

Mt. Mazama Plywood Co. v. Beattie

62 Or. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 1983

Frasure v. Agripac, 290 Or 99 , 619 P2d 274 (1980); Bauman v. SAIF, 62 Or App 323 , 661 P2d 105 (1983); Ginter v. Woodburn United Methodist Church, 62 Or App 118 , 659 P2d 434 (1983); Saxton v. … See Bahler v. Mail-Well Envelope Co., 60 Or App 90 , 652 P2d 875 (1982); Mobley v. SAIF, 58 Or App 394 , 648 P2d 1357 (1982). We therefore reverse and remand to the Board for determination of reasonable attorney fees.

Wantowski v. Crown Cork & Seal

175 Or. App. 609 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 2001

After the Board issued its decision, the Supreme Court established a different test for determining whether an injured worker’s compensable condition actually worsened. See SAIF v. … Consequently, we are unable to adequately review the Board’s conclusion that no objective evidence supported claimant’s aggravation claim. Iles v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 173 Or App 254 , 21 P3d 195 (2001).

T & R Service, Inc. v. Commission

3 Or. Tax 271 · Oregon Tax Court · Sep 13, 1968

Mittleman v. Commission, 2 OTR 105, 106 (1965). A taxpayer dissatisfied with the valuation placed upon his property by the assessor for that year must appeal to the county board of equalization. ORS 309.100. … See R.L.K. and Co. v. Tax Commission, 249 Or 603 , 438 P2d 985 , reversing 2 OTR 368 ; P.G.E. Co. v. Tax Commission, 249 Or 239 , 437 *274 P2d 827, reversing and remanding 2 OTR 222 , 2 OTR 356 .

Johnston v. Gordon Trucking - Heartland Express

305 Or. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 2020

Lowells v. SAIF, 285 Or App 161, 164, 396 P3d 241 (2017). Cf. Franke v. … Harris v.

Cooper v. Thomason

30 Or. 161 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1896

Where one party has done acts in part execution or upon the faith of the contract, with the knowledge and consent of the other, this will take the case out of the statute: Brown v. Lord, 7 Or. 302 ; Plymale v. … Good, 3 Watts & S. 56 ; Waterman’s Specific Performance of Contracts, § 15; Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § 471. -The deed to Cooper transferred the legal title which drew after it the possession (Swift v.

Giusti Wine Co. v. Adams

102 Or. App. 329 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 1990

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board after remand. In Giusti Wine Co. v. … Employer argues that the Board’s conclusion on good cause is inconsistent with Norton v.

Psu. Ass'n of University Professors v. Psu.

240 Or. App. 108 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

That was the logic adopted by the Employment Relations Board (board) in the order under review. The board relied on E.E.O.C. v. … Co. v.

State v. Victoroff

96 Or. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1989

He argues that it exceeds the court’s authority in the light of State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). See also State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221 , 744 P2d 231 (1987). … The evidentiary holdings oí Brown and Lyon are irrelevant.

Parker v. Norton

143 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1933

See Brennecke v. Ganahl Lumber Co. (Mo.), 44 S. W. (2d) 627 ; State ex rel. Brown v. Trimble, 324 Mo. 353 ( 23 S. W. (2d) 162 ); *172 Robinson v. Meek, 203 Iowa 185 ( 210 N. W. 762 ). … In Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 ( 222 N. W. 192 ), plaintiff was injured by falling from a box while attempting to pry off a board by the use of a wrecking *175 bar.

State v. Belander

274 Or. App. 167 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 2015

State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 277 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986). On appeal, defendant renews his argument that the automobile exception does not apply to justify the search in this case. … Brown, 301 Or at 277 . Unfortunately, the lines have not proved to be as clear as the Brown court hoped to make them, and further clarification has been necessary.

Crowder v. Alumaflex

163 Or. App. 143 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1999

Drews v. EBI Companies, 310 Or 134, 141 , 795 P2d 531 (1990). … Claimant also had assigned error to the Board’s conclusion that it did not have jurisdiction over his claim for vocational assistance, but he withdrew that claim in light of Sweisberger v.

Johnson v. School District No. 12

210 Or. 585 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1957

ORS 332.070; Stackpole v. School District No. 5, 9 Or 508 ; Barrow v. School District No. 8, 83 Or 272 , 162 P 789 ; Jacobberger v. School District No. 1, 114 Or 575 , 235 P 277 ; Boyle v. … Livesley v. Johnston, 45 Or 30, 47 , 76 P 13, 946 ; Lumberman’s Nat. Bank v. Minor, 65 Or 412, 416 , 133 P 87 ; Strode v. Smith, 66 Or 163, 180-182 , 131 P 1032 .

Capps v. Mines Service, Inc.

175 Or. 248 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1944

Berry, 8 How. 544 , quoted with approval in Coulter v. Portland Trust Co., 20 Or. 469, 481 , 26 P. 565 , 27 P. 266 . To the same effect see Brown v. Laird, 134 Or. 150, 156 , 291 P. 352 , 73 A. L. R. 877; Freeman v. … Brown v. Laird, supra, 134 Or. at p. 160 , and cases there cited. It follows that the decree of the circuit court was right, and it is affirmed.