Case law

Leidig v. State

475 Md. 181 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 16, 2021

Illinois would clearly justify basing our decision on Article 21 of the Declaration of Rights and not reaching the Sixth Amendment issue.” Id. … Rollo’s report is sufficiently “formal” under Justice Thomas’s concurring opinion in Williams to qualify as testimonial. The answer to that question is unclear.

Allstate Insurance v. Angeletti

71 Md. App. 210 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · May 6, 1987

departure from the usual rule establishing the time for appeal. 266 Md. at 555 , 295 A.2d 470 . … Clearly, it is crucial that the trial judge examine the complaint in the underlying suit to determine what exactly the issues are.

Prince

District Court, D. Maryland · Oct 28, 2025

At this stage of his case, to establish standing, Plaintiff must plead facts to plausibly establish standing, because it “must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of … Sovereign Immunity Additionally, the United States “is immune from suit save as it consents to be sued . . . and the terms of its consent to be sued in any court define

Board of Supervisors of Elections v. Attorney General

246 Md. 417 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 14, 1967

Baker, 23 Md. 531, 619 ), and therefore is the fundamental, extraordinary act by which the pepole establish the structure and mechanism of their government. … Whether this action is dependent upon the subsequent ratification of the people or not, is not clearly established; but when ratified and adopted, or acquiesced in, their acts are unquestionably within the limits prescribed

Ireland v. State

310 Md. 328 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 6, 1987

Petitioner’s first contention is clearly correct, and therefore we turn to the remaining contentions which we shall discuss in reverse order. I. … Lusby, 283 Md. 334 , 390 A.2d 77 (1978) (deleting the defense of inter-spousal immunity in the case of outrageous intentional torts); Harris v.

Crook v. Glenn

30 Md. 55 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 18, 1869

The onus is upon the appellants, and a failure to make out their case fully and clearly must result in their defeat. … That length of time may be relied on, in bar of redemption, seems now to be too well established to be made a question.

Green v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

927 F. Supp. 2d 244 · District Court, D. Maryland · Feb 27, 2013

They found a bank that agreed to process their loan application, but the bank ultimately determined that they qualified for an amount considerably less than needed to complete the sale. … So, too, is reasonable reliance necessary to establish liability for fraud and promissory estoppel.

Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Smith

333 Md. 3 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 8, 1993

Alternatively, we considered whether the Commission might qualify under the analysis at issue here: by showing that it was “ ‘aggrieved by the decision of the Board [of Appeals] and a party to the proceeding before it[.]’ … administrative agencies is intentionally designed to be informal so as to encourage citizen participation, we think that absent a reasonable agency or other regulation providing for a more formal method of becoming a party, anyone clearly

In the Matter of AutoFlex Fleet Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 3, 2024

disqualified bidder, then AutoFlex might be able to establish that it would be next in line, as the best qualified remaining bidder. 13  On January 8, 2021, the MSBE recounted … Rule 5-201 qualify as “one aspect of law that allows the Court to acknowledge a fact[.]”

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Albright

433 Md. 303 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 26, 2013

Appellees argue that such an interpretation, in effect, immunizes corporate deceit to governmental officials. We disagree. … As we noted in Vance , claims for emotional distress need not be supported necessarily by expert medical testimony to establish injury and causation where “the causal connection is clearly apparent from the illness itself

Pace Ex Rel. Pace v. State

425 Md. 145 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 22, 2012

They also moved to dismiss on the ground of governmental immunity. On March 15, 2007, Ms. … Kight, 406 Md. 167 , 957 A.2d 984 (2008): The rules governing the construction of Federal statutes are well-established.

Jordan v. Seltzer

District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 18, 2023

, programs, or activities for which they were otherwise qualified; and (3) the exclusion, denial of benefits, or discrimination was by reason of the disability. … , or activities for which he was otherwise qualified; and (3) the exclusion, denial of benefits, or discrimination was by reason of the disability.

Holmes v. State

119 Md. App. 518 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Feb 2, 1998

Detective Anthony Mammano, who was qualified as an expert in the packaging and identification of drugs, testified that it was his opinion that the substances were packaged for distribution and not for personal use. *523 I … I will establish these are routine booky (sic) questions. *528 THE COURT: That’s not a routine booky (sic) question.

State Tax Commission v. Harrington

126 Md. 157 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 12, 1915

Because, *159 as urged by tbe appellee, it is in violation of section 17 of Article 3 of the Constitution, which provides that “No senator or delegate, after qualifying as such, notwithstanding he may thereafter resign, shall … This language of the statute clearly authorizes and empowers the commission to fix the salary of the general counsel to the commission, which it, by its aforegoing resolution, fixed at three thousand dollar’s, and the result

Morris v. State

192 Md. App. 1 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Apr 29, 2010

The mandate in Evans clearly indicates that the Court did not reverse Evan’s death sentence. … Law § 3-402(a), clearly refers to robbery as defined by § 3-401(e).

Lucas v. State

116 Md. App. 559 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Aug 28, 1997

Thus, Detective Taylor’s qualifications clearly enabled him to testify as to the nature of the items found in the Monica Place apartment. … On appeal, the admission or rejection of such evidence “may be reversed if it is founded on an error of law or if the trial court clearly abused its discretion.” Id.

Ridgeway v. State

140 Md. App. 48 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 4, 2001

The question is that the Court clearly indicated that it was imposing a separate sentence for the offenses committed against each of these people. … The two shootings, in satisfaction of the first step, clearly fell within the "common plan" or "motive" exceptions to Rule 5-404(b).

Pense v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services

District Court, D. Maryland · Oct 7, 2020

After an interlocutory appeal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals resulting in a ruling that the Department had not waived sovereign immunity with regard to the Fair Employment Practices Act, I dismissed Counts II and … This means that the plaintiff must show clearly that “‘the employees “dealt with the same supervisor, [were] subject to the same standards and . . . engaged in the same conduct without such differentiating or mitigating

Attorney Griev. Comm'n of Maryland v. Protokowicz

326 Md. 714 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 9, 1992

The maximum penalty for the commission of this crime is imprisonment for a term of not more than three years; thus, the offense qualifies as a serious offense under Rule BV16. … The majority has clearly departed from the interpretation and application of Rule BV16 which had been adhered to in our prior opinions and orders.

Meade v. Shangri-La Partnership

424 Md. 476 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 26, 2012

issued a writ of certiorari in the case to consider whether discrimination because of a “handicap,” within the meaning of the Maryland statutory provisions, should be construed “strictly to create a demanding standard for qualifying … Nonetheless, the evidence in this case clearly supports the jury’s conclusion that Meade’s latex allergy was a handicap which damaged, weakened, or diminished her ability to interact with her son at school, as well as her