Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

6.78s

  • Dicks v. Clarence L. Boyd Co., Inc.

    205 Okla. 383 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1951

    We held in McKelvy v. … This case cites with approval our holding in Morris Plan Co. v. Campbell, 180 Okla. 11 , 67 P. 2d 52 . In the case of B. F. C. Morris Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Beatty v. Walker

    1 Okla. 178 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1893

    V. Francis and J. M. … V, Francis and J. M. Housel were each and all elected members of said board from their respective wards on the first Tuesday in April, [892, at a school meeting held in said city of Oklahoma City.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Taylor

    87 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1922

    Co. v. Eldredge, 67 Okla. 110 , 169 Pac. 1071 ; Duling. Co. Treas., v. First National Bank of Weleeka, 71 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 554 ; Brown, Co. Treas., v. Hennessey State Rank, 78 Okla. 141 , 189 Pac. 355 . … Co. v.

    Overruled in part by Branch v. Oklahoma County Excise Board, 183 Okla. 295 (1938)Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Carter

    165 Okla. 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1933

    University of Utah v. Candland et al., Members of the State Board of Land Commissioners, 104 P. 285 . … “We see no merit in the contention that the board of regents have no power under the act to issue bonds. Hall v. Hood River Irrigation District, 57 Ore. 69 , 116 P. 405 .”

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • In re Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma

    200 Okla. 442 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1948

    The general authority of the Board of Regents to exact student fees for proper purposes is fully recognized and well known. Rheam v. Board of Regents, 161 Okla. 268 , 18 P. 2d 535 . … Baker v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Miller v. Hewitt

    5 Okla. 167 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1897

    Elsbree v. … To the same effect is Byington v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • STATE v. HODGES

    2020 OK CR 2 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 2020

    In this proposition, the State also appears to argue that Section 759 and the Board of Test rules conflict with the rules of evidence regarding expert testimony under 12 O.S.2011, § 2702 and Taylor v. … STATE Discussed 1974 OK CR 151 , 525 P.2d 1359 , WESTERMAN v. STATE Discussed 2014 OK CR 14 , 334 P.3d 953 , STATE v. TERRY Discussed 2016 OK CR 26 , 387 P.3d 951 , STATE v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Smith v. State

    368 P.2d 246 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1962

    He identified Benny Brown as one of the men he took up. … In Plemons v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • George v. Adamson

    184 Okla. 289 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1939

    We said (citing Roberts v. … “In Roberts v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY v. WALTERS

    546 P.3d 875 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 2024

    Board of Education of Independent School District No. 1 of Grady County v. … Maynard Discussed 1952 OK 80, 242 P.2d 427, 206 Okla 261, THE FORTINBERRY CO. v. BLUNDELL Discussed 1955 OK 229, 287 P.2d 704, STATE v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Discussed 2003 OK 30, 66 P.3d 442, GLADSTONE v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Love v. Smith

    43 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1914

    In Kerr v. … Hart v. Harvey, 32 Barb. (N. Y.) 55.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Shofner v. Mercer

    164 Okla. 170 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1933

    . 5 v. … In the case of School District No. 18 of Creek County v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Petition of Wayland

    510 P.2d 1385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1971

    In Schware v. … However, Goldsmith had not demanded a hearing before the board and the judgment of the Court of Appeals was affirmed. In Salot v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Carlyle v. Independent School District No. I-71 of McCurtain County

    62 O.B.A.J. 1905 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1991

    Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Cloudman, 185 Okla. 400 , 92 P.2d 837 *621 (1939). … Further, the case cited in support of School Board’s argument, Lewis v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Vaughn

    33 Okla. 384 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1912

    W. v. S. F., 52 Cal. 111 .) … parties. *389 In Montgomery v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County

    68 O.B.A.J. 559 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1997

    See Excise Board of Grady County v. … See Board of County Commissioners of Osage County v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2009)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 2009

    Shea v. Shea , 537 P.2d 417 , 418 (Okla. 1975) (citation omitted). … DREW EDMONDSON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA DOROTHY BROWN ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 1 "Child care facility" is defined in the Oklahoma Child Care Facilities Licensing Act to mean "any public or private child care residential

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lovett, Creek County Com'rs v. Lankford

    47 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1914

    shall be chairman of said board. … Brashear v. Mason, 6 How. 92 [ 12 L. Ed. 357 ] ; United States ex rel. Goodrich v. Guthrie, 17 How. 285 [ 15 L. Ed. 102 ]; Commissioner of Patents v. Whiteley, 4 Wall. *23 522 [ 18 L. Ed. 385 ]; Georgia v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Olmstead v. Reedy

    387 P.2d 631 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1963

    Reedy filed with the Board. This is especially true since plaintiffs pleaded damage to alfalfa and truck patch. In the case of City of Tulsa v. … See Swisher v. Clark, 202 Okl. 25 , 209 P.2d 880 , and Hart v. Starnes Lbr. Co., Okl., 290 P.2d 123 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. BLACKBIRD, C. J., HALLEY, V. C.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. Bullen

    6 Okla. 757 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1898

    Cunningham, et al. v. Thomas, et al., 50 Pac. Rep. 615 , involving the same question, we are clearly of the opinion that the law was not correctly stated in the case of Gray v. … And under the provisions of our statutes relating to the assessment and valuation of property for revenue purposes, and defining the powers of the several officers and boards, we hold that the territorial board of equalization

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.