Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.21s
Lenape Regional High School District Board of Education v. Gp
205 N.J. 96 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 3, 2011
13 A.3d 363 (2011) 205 N.J. 96 LENAPE REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION v. G.P. C-581 September Term 2010, 067057 Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 3, 2011. Petition for Certification Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished77 N.J.L. 80 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1908
The procuration need not directly affect the board of registration, but if it puts in motion an act operating either upon the voter or upon the board, which results in getting a false name upon the registry list, it is within … Bishop: “The test to determine whether an of- *83 fence may be deemed joint or not, has been stated by an American judge (Chief Justice Robertson, in Comm v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMaglies v. Planning Board of the Township of East Brunswick
173 N.J. Super. 419 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 3, 1980
As plaintiffs point out, the court in Wilson v. … Levin v. Bridgewater Tp. Comm., supra, 57 N.J. at 537 . The planning board was justified in rejecting Magües’ evidence to the contrary. Affirmed.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLivingston v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners
81 N.J. 406 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 23, 1979
Cited 2 timesPublishedAwacs, Inc. v. Clementon Zoning Board of Adjustment
153 N.J. 46 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 11, 1998
Petition for certification is granted and summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to reconsider in the light of Smart SMR of New York v. Borough of Fair Lawn Board of Adjustment, 152 N.J. 309 , 704 A.2d 1271 (1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHelfman v. American Light Traction Co.
121 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 9, 1936
United States Steel Corp. v. Hodge ( Court of Errors and Appeals ), supra; Mitchell v. United Box Board and Paper Co., 72 N.J. Eq. 580 , 586 ; 66 Atl. Rep. 938 ; Stephany v. Marsden, 75 N.J. Eq. 90 , 93 ; 71 Atl. … See Mitchell v. United Box Board and Paper Co., supra; Endicott v. Marvel, 81 N.J. Eq. 378 , 382 , 383 ; 87 Atl. Rep. 230 ; Lillard v. Oil, Paint and Drug Co., 70 N.J. Eq. 197 (at p. 205 ); 56 Atl.
Cited 10 timesPublishedHeath v. Board of Managers of the Jersey City Medical Center
89 N.J. 441 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 30, 1982
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion textHowe v. Board of Education of Landis Township School District
72 N.J.L. 158 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1905
The fourth reason is that at the meeting in question the voters did not, before proceeding to ballot for members of the board of education, determine whether such board should consist of three, five or nine members. … State v. Van Winkle, 1 Dutcher 73; State v. Donahay, 1 Vroom 404 . Upon the same ground proceeded the decision in State, Winsor, pros., v. Brown et al., 2 Id. 355.
Cited 1 timesPublishedEnglish v. Board of Educ. of Town of Boonton
135 F. Supp. 2d 588 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 26, 2001
.”); Marlboro Township Board of Ed. v. Freehold Regional High School, 992 F.Supp. 756 (D.N.J.1998). Recently, in an unpublished opinion in this District, Board of Educ. of Branchburg v. … See also Pittman v. Chicago Board of Educ., 64 F.3d 1098, 1102 (7th Cir.1995) (citing Ball v. James, 451 U.S. 355, 362 , 101 S.Ct. 1811 , 68 L.Ed.2d 150 (1981); Salyer Land Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished279 Club, Inc. v. Municipal Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control
73 N.J. Super. 15 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 8, 1962
Crowley v. Christensen, 137 U. S. 86, 91 , 11 S. Ct. 13, 15 , 34 L. Ed. 620, 624 (1890), cited in Mazza v. Cavicchia, 15 N. … State v. Baldino, 11 N. J. Super. 158 (App. Div. 1951); State v. Damorjian, 187 Wis. 445 , 204 N. W. 498 (Wis. Sup. Ct. 1925).
Cited 3 timesPublishedBerninger v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF BOROUGH OF MIDLAND PARK
127 N.J. 226 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1992
Cited 6 timesPublishedMillville Electric Light Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
103 N.J.L. 198 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1926
Cited 1 timesPublishedMahler v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Fair Lawn
55 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 1, 1969
MAHLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN AND THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued November 17, 1969. … Floyd V. Amoresano, attorney). PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
Cited 1 timesPublishedA-Valey Engineers, Inc. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
106 F. Supp. 2d 711 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 17, 2000
Defendant Board of Freeholders is responsible for awarding various construction and renovation projects within the county. … In Fried v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedNorth Bergen Action Group v. North Bergen Township Planning Board
235 N.J. Super. 597 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 31, 1989
The Roc Harbour 1987 application was not the first to be heard by the Board. The planning board had voted approval of a similar variance and site plan on June 15, 1982. See Parisi v. North Bergen Mun. … In Commercial Realty v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNorton Naval Construction & Ship Building Co. v. State Board of Assessors
53 N.J.L. 564 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1891
No-return was made, and the tax was rated -by the state board of assessors. *565 Returns were made in 1888 and 1889, and from these ■returns of capital stock issued the taxes were assessed at 4634.10 and $646.67, o-n an increased … Evening Journal Association v. State Board of Assessors, 18 Vroom 36 ; Press Printing Co. v. State Board of Assessors , 22 Id. 75 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedHerrontown Woods Citizens Association v. Regional Planning Board of Princeton
197 N.J. 258 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 12, 2008
962 A.2d 530 (2008) 197 N.J. 258 HERRONTOWN WOODS CITIZENS ASSOCIATION v. REGIONAL PLANNING BOARD OF PRINCETON. C-469 September Term 2008, 63,297 Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 12, 2008.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLehigh Valley Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
102 N.J.L. 576 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1926
The fact that the company had not returned the property to the state board *579 of taxes and assessment for assessment does not decide the question, citing Jersey City v. Board of Equalization of Taxes, 74 N. J. L. 382. … Trenton, &c., Traction Corp. v. Mercer County Board of Taxation, 92 N. J. L. 398. The assessments to be sustained must be based upon evidence. Gibbs v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 101 N. J. L. 371.
Cited 1 timesPublished114 F. Supp. 726 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 20, 1953
Brown for $15,677.42. … It, therefore, seems clear that under the authority of Commissioner v. Breyer, supra, and Penrose v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRingleben v. City of Long Branch
11 N.J. Misc. 391 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 25, 1933
Brown, the commissioner of public safety, to enter into the contract. The appellant’s argument seems to be that the testimony of Mr. Brown was incompetent to prove his agency. … Leonard v. Standard Aero Corp., 95 N. J. L. 235, 237; 112 Atl. Rep. 252 .
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna