Case law

Broderick v. Catholic University of America

365 F. Supp. 147 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 1973

.); or granting of tax exemptions, Browns v. Mitchell, 409 F.2d 593 (10th Cir.). 443 F.2d at 123 . Thus, plaintiffs’ allegations of “governmental action” must be rejected. … See Goodman v. Dicker, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 353 , 169 F.2d 684 (1948), of. Dickerson v. Colgrove, 100 U.S. 578, 580 , 25 L.Ed. 618 (1879). 24 .

In Re Aiken County

645 F.3d 428 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2011

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. … See Cobell v.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

965 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2009

Brown had not met the rigorous test recognized in Cherrydale. Nevertheless, the CRB held that Mr. Brown was entitled to the new round of TTD benefits because our decisions in Cherrydale and Smith v. … See Watergate East, Inc. v.

Keystone Steel & Wire, Division of Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

41 F.3d 746 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1994

Local 21, Intemational Brotherhood, of Teamsters v. … In Teamsters v.

Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local Union No. 223 v. National Labor Relations Board

498 F.2d 687 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 10, 1974

Duie Pyle, Inc. v. … Another aspect of the Board’s order was set aside in Western Monolithics Concrete Products, Inc. v. NLRB, 446 F.2d 522 (9th Cir. 1971). 39 .

Retail Clerks Local Union No. 381, Affiliated With the Retail Clerks International Associations, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Industrial Conference Board and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Industrial Conference Board and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association

348 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1965

INDUSTRIAL CONFERENCE BOARD and Kitsap County Retail Druggists' Association, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Brown et al., 85 S.Ct. 980 , the order of the Board insofar as applicable to No. 17790 is modified by deleting therefrom in paragraph 1(a) the requirement that the employers involved cease and desist from 'engaging in a lock-out

Torres v. Wormuth

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2025

“[S]uch corrections shall be made by the Secretary acting through boards of civilians of the executive part of th[e relevant] military department[.]” Moskowitz v. … See Army Reg. 600-37 ¶ 6-1(e); see, e.g., Moskowitz, 2025 WL 901241, at *5 (“[T]he Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army overturned the Corrections Board’s recommendation.”); Brown v.

Markovich v. Nichols

429 A.2d 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1981

The Board, on March 7, 1980, considered petitioner’s claim for disability retirement benefits for the third time. It was during this hearing that the Board first learned of petitioner’s increasing mental stress. … The fatal defect with the Board’s decision is that the findings and conclusions drawn do not support the Board’s decision under the provisions cited and relied upon.

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. National Labor Relations Board

237 F.2d 20 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1956

In Swift’s petition for rehearing we are again urged to hold that the Board erred in refusing to pass upon the legality of the appeals made at the Union’s meetings, or to remand to the Board to require it to decide this issue … Under the circumstances here presented we do not think the statute made such a decision mandatory upon the Board, or that we are required to remand the case for such a decision by the Board.

Shenk v. Cohen

51 A.2d 298 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1947

Bowles v. American Stores, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 238 , 139 F.2d 377 , certiorari denied 322 U.S. 730 , 64 S.Ct. 947 , 88 L.Ed. 1565 . Brown v. … See also Bowles v. Farmers Nat. Bank of Lebanon, Ky., 6 Cir., 147 F. 2d 425 ; Brown v. Cummins Distilleries Corporation, D.C.W.D.Ky., 56 F.Supp. 941 . See Lambur v. Yates, supra.

N.Y.C. Apparel F.Z.E. v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection Bureau

District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 2009

It noted that “[t]he court in Brown . . . stressed that its ruling did not upset the decision in Thompson v. Sawyer, 678 F.2d 257 (D.C. … Brown, 78 F.3d at 652.

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen, Local Union 576 v. National Labor Relations Board

516 F.2d 1244 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 1, 1975

Gissel *319 Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969), and this court’s decision in Local 195, Wine & Liquor Salesmen v. NLRB, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 452 F.2d 1312 (1971). … In Local 347, Meat Cutters v.

Johnson v. United States

398 A.2d 354 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1979

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 496 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 441 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). … Pollock v. Brown, D.C.App., 395 A.2d 50 (1978); Moore v. Moore, D.C.App., 391 A.2d 762, 770-72 (1978); Farrell v. United States, D.C.App., 391 A.2d 755 (1978).

Adirondack Medical Center v. Kathleen Sebelius

740 F.3d 692 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 2014

Raab, Attorney.  2 Before: ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge. … (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 (2000))). With that in mind, we turn to the Hospitals’ argument.

Battineni v. Jaddou

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 21, 2025

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v. … Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 (citation omitted). III.

Golding-Alleyne v. Department of Employment Services

980 A.2d 1209 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 2009

See Gage v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 738 A.2d 1219, 1222 (D.C.1999) (finding “no error in the Board’s determination that petitioners failed to satisfy their burden of proof’). … The judgment of the Compensation Review Board is hereby Affirmed. 1 .

Laborers' Local Union No. 204, Laborers' International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

904 F.2d 715 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 1990

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. … See Giant Food Markets, Inc. v.

In Re Bach

966 A.2d 350 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 2009

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Brown, 524 A.2d 1184, 1188 (1987) ("`bursting bubble' presumption . . . has no evidentiary weight once rebutted by some evidence to the contrary").

Faic Securities, Inc. v. United States

768 F.2d 352 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 1985

Brief for Appellant Bank Board at 52. … In Craig v.

Francis J. Charlton v. Federal Trade Commission

543 F.2d 903 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 1976

See also NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839, 849 (1965); United States v. Carlo Bianchi Co., 373 U.S. 709, 715-718 , 83 S.Ct. 1409, 1413-1415 , 10 L.Ed.2d 652, 657-660 (1963); SEC v. … State Bar of California, 71 Cal.2d 535 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 696 , 455 P.2d 800, 810 (1969); Bar Assoc. of Baltimore City v. Marshall, 269 Md. 510 , 307 A.2d 677, 681 (1973); State Board v.