Case law

Howard v. Willamette Poultry

101 Or. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 23, 1990

The claimant took a position before the Board on responsibility that would have resulted in increased time loss benefits. Phipps , however, does not refer to Shoulders v. SAIF, supra, and predates Short v. … In Dilworth v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 95 Or App 85 , 767 P2d 484 , rev den 307 Or 658 (1989), and SAIF v.

Phillips v. Graves

139 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1931

As early as 1870 this court in Brown v. Harper, 4 Or. 89 , pointed out that the authorities treated the right to assert and perfect a mechanic’s lien as a privilege personal to the mechanic and not transferable. … Brown, Belt, Campbell and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Cooper v. Thomason

30 Or. 161 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1896

Where one party has done acts in part execution or upon the faith of the contract, with the knowledge and consent of the other, this will take the case out of the statute: Brown v. Lord, 7 Or. 302 ; Plymale v. … Good, 3 Watts & S. 56 ; Waterman’s Specific Performance of Contracts, § 15; Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § 471. -The deed to Cooper transferred the legal title which drew after it the possession (Swift v.

Pena v. Travelers Ins. Co. (In re Pena)

294 Or. App. 740 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 2018

See Don't Waste Oregon Com. v. … See Smith v. Veterinary Medical Examining Board , 175 Or.

State v. Victoroff

96 Or. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1989

He argues that it exceeds the court’s authority in the light of State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). See also State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221 , 744 P2d 231 (1987). … The evidentiary holdings oí Brown and Lyon are irrelevant.

Crowder v. Alumaflex

163 Or. App. 143 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1999

Drews v. EBI Companies, 310 Or 134, 141 , 795 P2d 531 (1990). … Claimant also had assigned error to the Board’s conclusion that it did not have jurisdiction over his claim for vocational assistance, but he withdrew that claim in light of Sweisberger v.

Capps v. Mines Service, Inc.

175 Or. 248 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1944

Berry, 8 How. 544 , quoted with approval in Coulter v. Portland Trust Co., 20 Or. 469, 481 , 26 P. 565 , 27 P. 266 . To the same effect see Brown v. Laird, 134 Or. 150, 156 , 291 P. 352 , 73 A. L. R. 877; Freeman v. … Brown v. Laird, supra, 134 Or. at p. 160 , and cases there cited. It follows that the decree of the circuit court was right, and it is affirmed.

Red Robin International v. Dombrosky

207 Or. App. 476 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 30, 2006

See, e.g., Tri-Met, Inc. v. Wolfe, 192 Or App 556 , 86 P3d 111 (2004). … Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. 1 In French-Davis v.

Astoria Plywood Co. v. Culp

115 Or. App. 737 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 1992

Perez v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co., 289 Or 295, 299 , 613 P2d 32 (1980); see City of Portland v. Smith, 314 Or 178, 186 , 838 P2d 568 (1992). … In Armstrong v.

SAIF Corp. v. Terleski

240 Or. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2011

Marvin Wood Products v. Callow, 171 Or App 175, 183-84 , 14 P3d 686 (2000). … See Shubert v.

State v. Roelle

261 Or. App. 705 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 26, 2014

State v. Dimmick, 248 Or App 167, 169 , 273 P3d 212 (2012). Around 9:15 a.m. on July 16, 2010, defendant’s domestic partner, Brown, told a police officer that defendant had abused her earlier that morning. … State v. Thompson, 328 Or 248, 256-57 , 971 P2d 879 , cert den, 527 US 1042 (1999) (interpreting ORS 132.560 (1993), amended by Or Laws 1999, ch 1040, § 17, which required a showing of “prejudice”); State v.

Multnomah Cty. v. Mult. Cty. Corrections Deputy Assn.

317 Or. App. 89 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 20, 2022

Board (board). … B. v.

State v. Turner

34 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1898

the tow : Wilson v. … In Chapman v. Jackson, 9 Rich.

State v. Jayne

173 Or. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 25, 2001

Jennings, 331 Or at 301 (citing State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 408-09 , 687 P2d 751 (1984)). The relevancy requirements of OEC 401 are not stringent. … Brown.”

Godleske v. Morrow

161 Or. App. 523 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 7, 1999

We resolved the issue of whether the Board must rely solely on a psychologist’s or psychiatrist’s diagnosis in extending a parole release date in Weidner v. … We addressed a similar argument in Peek v.

Benz v. SAIF Corp.

170 Or. App. 22 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 27, 2000

In Roseburg Forest Products v. … Although the Board may draw reasonable inferences from the medical evidence, it is not free to reach its own medical conclusions about causation in the absence of such evidence. See SAIF v.

State v. Link

297 Or. App. 126 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 2019

See, e.g. , Wille v. Board of Parole , 287 Or. … Board of Parole , 287 Or.

United States v. McCoy

839 F. Supp. 1442 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 20, 1993

In deciding whether consent is the fruit of illegal police conduct, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has relied on cases regarding the admissibility of confessions made after an illegal arrest, primarily Brown v. … Relying on United States v.

SAIF Corp. v. Kelly

130 Or. App. 185 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 7, 1994

The Board refers to claimant’s “right wrist de Quervain’s tenosynovitis.” Those labels appear to be interchangeable. 2 In Bracke v. … See also Timm v.

Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. Ernst

190 Or. App. 525 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 2003

Fred Meyer then requested review by the board. ORS 656.289(3). The board panel that reviewed the case consisted of board members Biehl, Bock, and Phillips Polich. … Resolution of this issue requires interpretation of several statutes: ORS 656.012; ORS 656.289; ORS 656.712; ORS 656.716; and ORS 656.718. 1 In construing those statutes, we apply the familiar methodology described in PGE v.