Case law

McCrea v. D.C. Police & Firefighters' Ret. & Relief Bd.

199 A.3d 208 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 3, 2019

injuries from sexual harassment are not compensable in workers' compensation and the courts remain open to common law claims, Underwood , 665 A.2d at 638 , and a similar rule applies for most public sector workers, King [ v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Wilder Mfg. Co., Inc., Textile Workers Union of America, Intervenor

454 F.2d 995 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 1972

However, the Board contends that since its Supplemental Decision and Order proceeded from this court’s remand order in Textile Workers Union of America v. … Textile Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 67, 68 , 420 F.2d 635, 636 (1969).

In Re Aiken County

645 F.3d 428 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2011

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. … See Cobell v.

United Packinghouse, Food and Allied Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Farmers' Cooperative Compress, Intervenor. Farmers' Cooperative Compress v. National Labor Relations Board, United Packinghouse, Food and Allied Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

416 F.2d 1126 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 10, 1969

In its historic decision in Brown v. … This circumstance does not gainsay the Supreme Court's finding in Brown v.

Harter Tomato Products Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

133 F.3d 934 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1998

HTPC now petitions for review of the Board’s order. The Board cross-applies for enforcement. We review the Board’s factual conclusions for substantial evidence, Universal Camera Corp. v. … Because HTPC failed to present this argument to the Board clearly enough, we cannot consider it now. Consolidated Freightways v.

Leroy Stephens v. United States

271 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 22, 1959

Brinegar v. United States, 1949, 338 U.S. 160, 175 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1310 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 . And see Draper v. United States, 1959, 358 U.S. 307 , 79 S.Ct. 329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 . … Maghan v. Jerome, 1937, 67 App.D.C. 9 , 88 F.2d 1001 Any offense punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year is a felony. All others are misdemeanors. Maghan v. Jerome, supra; see United States v.

United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. ex rel. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

2 D.C. 179 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1935

Okereh v. Winter

600 F. Supp. 2d 139 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2009

Okereh filed an employment-discrimination complaint with the Merit Systems Protection Board (the Board) claiming he was fired based on his race, national origin, and color. (Id. at ¶ 3.) … Washington v.

Dallas Mailers Union, Local No. 143 and International Mailers Union v. National Labor Relations Board

445 F.2d 730 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1971

We therefore enforce the order of the National Labor Relations Board insofar as it adopts sections 1(e) and 2(a), (b), (c) and (e) of the Recommended Order of the Trial Examiner. 4 (J.A. 47-48.) … By confusing excuse for reason Weimar Cantrell eventually made his case the topic of letters and the concern of a trial examiner and later the National Labor Relations Board.

Directsat U.S. LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

925 F.3d 1272 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 2019

We review the Board’s determination of a constitutional issue de novo. See J.J. Cassone Bakery, Inc. v. NLRB, 554 F.3d 1041, 1044 (D.C. Cir. 2009). … KLB Indus. v. NLRB, 700 F.3d 551, 556 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (citation omitted).

Harrison v. United States

76 A.3d 826 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2013

Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118, 124-25 (D.C.1996) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Sherer v. United States, 470 A.2d 732, 738-39 (D.C.1983). … Head v.

Rothery Storage & Van Co. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.

792 F.2d 210 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1986

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962), introduced into merger law the concept of submarkets within the relevant market. … Board of Regents, 468 U.S. 85 , 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984) (“NCAA”), and Northern Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v.

Broderick v. Catholic University of America

365 F. Supp. 147 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 1973

.); or granting of tax exemptions, Browns v. Mitchell, 409 F.2d 593 (10th Cir.). 443 F.2d at 123 . Thus, plaintiffs’ allegations of “governmental action” must be rejected. … See Goodman v. Dicker, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 353 , 169 F.2d 684 (1948), of. Dickerson v. Colgrove, 100 U.S. 578, 580 , 25 L.Ed. 618 (1879). 24 .

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

965 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2009

Brown had not met the rigorous test recognized in Cherrydale. Nevertheless, the CRB held that Mr. Brown was entitled to the new round of TTD benefits because our decisions in Cherrydale and Smith v. … See Watergate East, Inc. v.

Ralph J. Alvey v. United Air Lines, Inc

494 F.2d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 1974

Alvey had as carry-on baggage a pasteboard folder and a small package wrapped in brown paper. He stood in line waiting to be searched. … She “stated a man that had boarded the plane was acting irrationally, and he had upset a few of the other passengers on the plane.”

Markovich v. Nichols

429 A.2d 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1981

The Board, on March 7, 1980, considered petitioner’s claim for disability retirement benefits for the third time. It was during this hearing that the Board first learned of petitioner’s increasing mental stress. … The fatal defect with the Board’s decision is that the findings and conclusions drawn do not support the Board’s decision under the provisions cited and relied upon.

Keystone Steel & Wire, Division of Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

41 F.3d 746 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1994

Local 21, Intemational Brotherhood, of Teamsters v. … In Teamsters v.

Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local Union No. 223 v. National Labor Relations Board

498 F.2d 687 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 10, 1974

Duie Pyle, Inc. v. … Another aspect of the Board’s order was set aside in Western Monolithics Concrete Products, Inc. v. NLRB, 446 F.2d 522 (9th Cir. 1971). 39 .

Adirondack Medical Center v. Kathleen Sebelius

740 F.3d 692 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 2014

Raab, Attorney.  2 Before: ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge. … (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 (2000))). With that in mind, we turn to the Hospitals’ argument.

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. National Labor Relations Board

237 F.2d 20 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1956

In Swift’s petition for rehearing we are again urged to hold that the Board erred in refusing to pass upon the legality of the appeals made at the Union’s meetings, or to remand to the Board to require it to decide this issue … Under the circumstances here presented we do not think the statute made such a decision mandatory upon the Board, or that we are required to remand the case for such a decision by the Board.