Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersWV

5,304 results

1.23s

  • State v. Rodoussakis

    204 W. Va. 58 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1998

    Whitted, 232 N.J.Super. 384, 389 , 557 A.2d 327, 330 (N.J.Super.A.D.1989) (holding that New Jersey’s Comprehensive Drug Reform Act of 1986 “established a new first degree offense which would hold drug distributors strictly … Young quite correctly excluded the proffered testimony of the attorney regarding a leniency/immunity agreement. Because [the State’s witness] waived the privilege, the opposite result obtains here.

    Cited 205 timesPublished
  • Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Wender

    District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Aug 29, 2018

    In making this determination, a court “should not seek out conflicts . . . where none clearly exist[].” College Loan Corp. v. … ), -5(a)(9) (political subdivision immune from liability for exercise of licensing powers) (LexisNexis 2018).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Amy D. Hiltner v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 18, 2022

    The onset of disability was established to be September 1, 2015. An Independent Medical Evaluation report prepared by D. Kelly Agnew, M.D., dated January 9, 2019, noted that diffuse tenderness was found at Ms. … Agnew was found to be the most qualified of the medical examiners to make a determination of whole person impairment in the claim. Although Ms. Hiltner was seeking an award based upon Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wheeling Ice & Storage Co. v. Conner

    61 W. Va. 111 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1906

    “The evidence clearly establishes the fact that these notes were endorsed by Conner with the name of the Wheeling Ice and Storage Company, without authority from the company. “ It w.as suggested that while the directors of … Conner, Secretary, and the indorsement would clearly indicate that the plaintiff company was an accommodation indorser. Savings Bank v. Shawnee Bank, 95 U.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc. v. Rivenburgh

    206 F. Supp. 2d 782 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jun 17, 2002

    May 8 Decision is Consistent with SMCRA Movants propose SMCRA “clearly envisions the placement of excess spoil fills in streams.” (U.S. Mem. for Stay at 9-10.) … The final configuration must be “compatible with the natural drainage pattern”, id. at (G), and its design approved by a qualified registered engineer. Id. at (H).

    Reversed on other grounds by Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc. v. Rivenburgh, 317 F.3d 425 (2003)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Davis Trust Co. v. Elkins

    114 W. Va. 742 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1934

    Otherwise, he would not have deemed it prudent to establish the trust fund for his children as each were receiving a large fortune from his estate. … I desire that my Executors shall be permitted to qualify and act without giving any security.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jefferson County Commission v. Tennant

    876 F. Supp. 2d 682 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jan 4, 2012

    Senate Resolution No. 103, adopted at the outset of the special session, established the Select Committee on Redistricting (the “Committee”), comprised of the seventeen Task Force senators. … The Secretary thereafter transmits to the clerks of the fifty-five county commissions a certification that the candidate is qualified to appear on the ballot. See id. § 3-5-9.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of West Virginia ex rel. v. Robin Miller, Superintendent

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 11, 2019

    To succeed on such a claim, a petitioner must establish that: 1) his trial counsePs 12 ,. … Moreover, the Miller court held that there is a ''wide range" of performance which qualifies as constitutionally-adequate assistance of counsel, stating: -- - - - -·---A-defendmt--seeking t-O-

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of West Virginia v. Alexander Paul Delorenzo

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 18, 2022

    Therefore, I would find that the circuit court abused its discretion and was clearly wrong 5 in excluding the expert’s testimony, and that the petitioner was thereby deprived of his right to a fair trial. … Va. 223, 224, 366 S.E.2d 731, 732 (1988) (“Qualified expert testimony regarding rape trauma syndrome is relevant and admissible in a prosecution for rape where the defense is consent.

    Cited 0 timesSeparate
  • Alexander v. Andrews

    135 W. Va. 403 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1951

    this statute, his grantee in the subsequent deed gets title to the land in cases where the grantee in the first deed fails to record his deed before the second deed is executed, and where the grantee in the second deed can qualify … the facts and circumstances which clearly indicate notice, *410 which, of course, under the statute, would in a case such as is now before us, prevent him from receiving the benefits of the statute quoted above.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Manor Care Inc. v. Tom Douglas

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 18, 2014

    The majority correctly notes that “[c]laims related to business decisions, such as proper budgeting and staffing, by entities that do not qualify as Health Care Providers under the MPLA simply do not fall within that statutory … That said, I am troubled by the verdict form’s lack of clarity on the award of McDavid damages, to which the Estate was clearly entitled.

    Cited 0 timesSeparate
  • Staudenmaier v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, N.D. West Virginia · Jan 22, 2021

    Listing 12.06 sets forth the criteria for a qualifying anxiety disorder. Under 20 C.F.R. § Pt. 404, Subpt. … P, App. 1, the record supports a finding of a qualifying anxiety disorder if the criteria of A and B, or B and C are satisfied.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Westfield Insurance Company v. Sistersville Tank Works, Inc., Robert N. Edwards, E. Jane Price, Douglas Steele, Carol Steele, Gary Thomas Sandy, Peggy P. Sandy, Reagle & Padden, Inc., and David C. Padden

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 8, 2023

    The insuring agreement contained three qualifying clauses: This insurance applies only to “bodily injury” and “property damage” which occurs during the policy period. … In addition, the policy clearly is also triggered if ‘disease’ manifests itself during the policy period.”)); California (Montrose Chem. Corp. v. Admiral Ins.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wells v. Antero Resources Corporation

    District Court, N.D. West Virginia · Oct 29, 2020

    Federal Rule of Evidence 702, governing the admissibility of expert testimony, provides: A witness who is qualified … Thus, Fisher lacks a reliable basis in his previous work or experience to propose what is clearly a novel method for calculating the amount of royalties Antero allegedly owes the Plaintiffs.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gray v. Heritage-Crystal Clean, LLC

    District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Oct 31, 2024

    He clearly understood the policies and rules in place for such transactions, and he violated them through his conduct related to the Service Wire job. … The disparate treatment model provides that an employer may not deny job opportunities to qualified individuals because of their disabilities.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Firstbank Shinnston v. West Virginia Insurance

    185 W. Va. 754 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1991

    Clearly, in the case before us, there were no material facts in dispute upon which West Virginia Insurance could have relied to support an effective cancellation of *761 Firstbank’s interest as mortgagee. … The circuit court concluded that there was no evidence that West Virginia Insurance was organized or qualified as a Farmers Mutual Fire Association Company.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Richard Otto and Patricia Otto v. Catrow Law, PLLC

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 2, 2020

    In short, the court applied an antiquated doctrine known as the “locality rule” to bar testimony that was clearly and unequivocally admissible under Rule 702 of the West Virginia Rules of Evidence … , it will be 1 Rule 702(a) provides that “[i]f scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified

    Cited 0 timesSeparate
  • Mills v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jan 3, 2023

    To prevail under Rule 60(b), “the party moving for relief must clearly establish the grounds therefore to the satisfaction of the district court . . . and such grounds must be clearly substantiated by adequate proof.” … Plaintiff clearly has no constitutional right to counsel in this civil action, and appointment thereof rests within the discretion of the court.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Martez Griffin v. Charles Williams

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Feb 19, 2021

    Counsel remembered clearly viewing the confession video and believed he saw the surveillance video.!?9 82. … Petitioner was charged—as clearly detailed in the indictment—with a violation of W. Va. Code 61-2-12(a).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ESTATE OF DEARING BY DEARING v. Dearing

    646 F. Supp. 903 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Oct 22, 1986

    The burden is on the Plaintiffs to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that James was insane at the time the cause of action accrued. Fines v. Kendrick, 219 Va. 1084 , 254 S.E.2d 108 (1979). … “[Legitimate enterprises] enjoy neither an inherent incapacity for criminal activity nor immunity from its consequences.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.