Case law

Garcia v. SAIF Corp.

187 Or. App. 51 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 20, 2003

Allie v. SAIF, 79 Or App 284, 289 [, 719 P2d 47 ] (1986).” The ALJ upheld SAIF’s denial, and the board adopted and affirmed the ALJ’s order. … See Dietz v.

Lebanon Plywood v. Seiber

113 Or. App. 651 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 1, 1992

The Board recognized that there would be an overpayment of amounts actually due and authorized employer to offset the overpayment against any future permanent disability awards. 1 The Board characterized the payments as “ … Fazzolari v. United Beer Dist., 91 Or App 592 , 757 P2d 857 , adhered to 93 Or App 103 , 761 P2d 6 , rev den 307 Or 236 , 765 P2d 810 (1988).

Northwest Greentree, Inc. v. Cervantes-Ochoa

113 Or. App. 186 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 20, 1992

We conclude that the Board did apply the correct standard, which is the permanent employment relation test. Kolar v. B & C Contractors, 36 Or App 65, 71 , 583 P2d 562 (1978). … The Board applied that test, under which the key inquiry is “the extent to which the claimant’s work outside the state is temporary.” Hobson v.

Titus v. City of Prairie City

802 F. Supp. 2d 1210 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 14, 2011

However, a board member who makes an initial decision and subsequently serves on a review board to review that decision does not, without more, create bias. See Vanelli v. Reynolds Sch. Dist. … Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 207 Or.App. 163, 169 , 139 P.3d 1048, 1052 , rev. denied, 342 Or. 253 , 149 P.3d 1212 (2006). Titus claims that his termination falls under the first exception.

Oldham v. Plumlee

151 Or. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 1997

Director has intervened and argues that this case is controlled by Lankford v. … See Callahan v. Employment Division, 97 Or App 234 , 776 P2d 21 (1989).

United States v. McCoy

839 F. Supp. 1442 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 20, 1993

In deciding whether consent is the fruit of illegal police conduct, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has relied on cases regarding the admissibility of confessions made after an illegal arrest, primarily Brown v. … Relying on United States v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Farris

229 Or. 209 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1961

Fuller-Toponce Truck Co. v. … In re Irwin, 162 Or 221 , 91 P2d 518 ; State v. Mannix, supra; State v. Estes, supra; State v. Garland, 77 Or 92 , 150 P 289 ; In re Moynihan, supra.

Schlesinger v. City of Portland

200 Or. App. 593 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 13, 2005

See, e.g., Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (A79626), 131 Or App 538, 540 , 886 P2d 1033 (1994), aff'd in part and rev’d in part on other grounds, 325 Or 185 , 935 P2d 411 (1997). … Shatzer, 337 Or 345, 349 , 97 P3d 1161 (2004) (quoting Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982)).

State v. Carmickle

307 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1988

In 1911 the legislature by chapter 127 created a Parole Board to report to the Governor on cases where it recommended that parole be granted. … Brown v. State (Alaska) 559 P2d 107 (1977); State v. Ritchie, 243 NC 182, 90 SE2d 301 (1955); State v. Jackson, 272 NW2d 102, 104 (SD 1978); Garski v. State, 75 Wis 2d 62 , 248 NW2d 425, 433 (1977).

Hamel v. Johnson

169 Or. App. 216 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 2000

See Peek v. Thompson, 160 Or App 260 , 980 P2d 178 , rev dismissed 329 Or 553 (1999); Weidner v. … In Bedell v.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Woda

166 Or. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 2000

Employer appealed to the Board, and a divided Board affirmed. … Having said that, we conclude that the Board majority and claimant have the better of the argument. Our analysis begins with the text of the relevant statute in its context. PGE v.

Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.

258 Or. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 11, 2013

Claimant sought judicial review, and this court held that the board could assess a separate penalty for each unreasonable refusal to close the claim. Cayton v. … Cayton v.

State v. Futch

123 Or. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1993

He relies on the legal criteria established in State v. Brown, 297 Or. 404, 416 , 687 P.2d 751 (1984), to evaluate scientific evidence. … Plemel v. Walter, 303 Or. 262 , 735 P.2d 1209 (1987) further supports the application of the Brown guidelines to RFLP testing.

SAIF v. Krusenstjerna

346 Or. App. 429 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 7, 2026

Providence Health System v. … On this record then, the board opinion lacks sub- stantial evidence and substantial reason. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v.

Loud v. Gold Ray Realty Co.

72 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1914

The right to a lien of this kind is a creature of the statute, and the right to perfect such a lien is limited to the persons who do the work or furnish the material or supplies: Brown v. Harper, 4 Or. 92 ; Alderson v. … In Alderson v.

Cooper v. Thomason

30 Or. 161 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1896

Where one party has done acts in part execution or upon the faith of the contract, with the knowledge and consent of the other, this will take the case out of the statute: Brown v. Lord, 7 Or. 302 ; Plymale v. … Good, 3 Watts & S. 56 ; Waterman’s Specific Performance of Contracts, § 15; Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § 471. -The deed to Cooper transferred the legal title which drew after it the possession (Swift v.

Johnston v. Gordon Trucking - Heartland Express

305 Or. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 2020

Lowells v. SAIF, 285 Or App 161, 164, 396 P3d 241 (2017). Cf. Franke v. … Harris v.

Bluemer v. Southland Industries

221 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 2008

In Marvin Wood Products v. … Citing Somers v.

Ramp v. Marion County

24 Or. 461 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1893

City Council of Montgomery, 65 Ala. *463 403 ; Lincoln v. City of Worcester, 8 Cush. 55 . … Bank v. Jordan, 16 Or. 113 ( 17 Pac. 621 ); Or. & Cal. R. R. Co. v. Lane Co. 23 Or. 385 ( 31 Pac. 964 ).

Short v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

88 Or. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1987

Short v. SAIF, 79 Or App 423, 429 , 719 P2d 894 (1986). … Shoulders v. SAIF, 300 Or 606, 615 , 716 P2d 651 (1986); Greenslitt v. City of Lake Oswego, 88 Or App 94 , 744 P2d 577 (1987). That statute does not provide for circuit court review of attorney fees.