Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

3.56s

  • Johnson v. American Trust Co.

    125 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1927

    Robison v. Thompson, 108 Okla. 160 , 236 Pac. 395 (and cases there cited). … J., MASON, V. C. J., and LESTER, CLARK, RILEY, and HEFNER, JJ., concur. Note. — -See 4 O. J. p. 879, §2853; 2 R. G .L. p. 194; 1 R. C. L. Supp. p. 433 ; 4 R. G L. Supp. p. 90 ; 5 R- C. L. Supp. p. 79; 6 R. C. L.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Nixon v. Roberts

    420 P.2d 898 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1966

    In Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief & Pension Fund v. … See also Allen v. Board of Com’rs of Logan County, 131 Okl. 41 , 267 P. 860 , and Joachim v. Board of Education of Walters, 207 Okl. 248 , 249 P.2d 129 . And in Board of Education of Town of Owasso v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In Re Brown

    354 B.R. 535 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 17, 2006

    In Duran v. … .”); see also Johnson v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.

    184 P.3d 518 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 2008

    Supp.2006 § 759 creates the Board of Tests for Alcohol and Drug Influence and authorizes the Board to set rules. … Bank of Tulsa v. Board of Comm'rs of Craig County, 1939 OK 320, ¶ 0 , 95 P.2d 878 [all per *527 sons are presumed to know the law]; Town of Red Fork v.

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Duncan v. Kelley

    103 Okla. 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1924

    Citing Brown v. Trent, 36 Okla. 239 , 128 Pac. 895 ; Adams v. White, 40 Okla. 535 , 139 Pac. 514 ; Shaffer v. Turner, 43 Okla. 744 , 144 Pac. 366 ; Fulkerson et al v. Mara, 68 Okla. 272 , 173 Pac. 811 ; Bowker v. … Brown v. Trent. 36 Okla. 239 , 128 Pac. 895 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • DeWolf v. State

    245 P.2d 107 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 28, 1952

    Turner v. State, 111 Tenn. 593 , 69 S.W. 774 , wherein it was held that such situation "does not vitiate the proceedings of the commissioners when the other members of the board are qualified." … Hall v. State, supra; Makley v. State, supra; Pierpont v. State, supra.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bonnett v. State Ex Rel. Newer

    47 Okla. 503 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1915

    Zeigler, County Clerk, 26 Okla. 826 , 110 Pac. 1052 ; Parker et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, 41 Okla. 723 , 139 Pac. 981 . In Reynolds et al. v. … In support of this section of the syllabus the court cites Stookey v. Board, 6 Idaho, 542 , 57 Pac. 312 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hutchinson v. State

    74 Okla. Crim. 30 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1942

    In Mitchell v. State, 73 Okla. … Hammonds v. State, 73 Okla. Cr. 287 , 120 P. 2d 376 . *33 In Nott v. State, 70 Okla.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Garrett v. Watson

    342 P.2d 560 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1959

    In Robberson v. Board of County Com’rs, Okl., 302 P.2d 784 , we cited Fletcher v. Board of County Com’rs, supra, as authority for affirming. In Fletcher v. … See, in this connection, Stuart v. King, 203 Okl. 23 , 217 P.2d 540 , cited in Chandler Materials Co. v. Board of County Commissioners, supra.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Havens v. State Industrial Com.

    156 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1932

    In the case of Mobley v. Brown, 151 Okla. 167 , 2 P. (2d) 1034 , this court held: “The employment as a deliveryman for a drug store is not hazardous employment as contemplated by sections 7283 and 7284, C. O. … Reports, in Mobley v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma Industries Authority v. Barnes

    769 P.2d 115 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1988

    This position was reaffirmed in Board of Johnson County Com'rs v. … Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, Okl., 285 P.2d 1034, 1042-1043 [1955]. . 68 O.S.1981 § 2419; Jenkins v. Frederick, supra note 4 ; State v. Shamblin, supra note 4 , State v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Cherokee County Pub. Co. v. Cherokee County

    48 Okla. 722 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1915

    (Beaty v. State ex rel. Lee, 35 Okla. 682 , 130 Pac. 958 , citing Rakowski v. Wagoner, 24 Okla. 282 , 103 Pac. 632; Trapp v. Wells Fargo Exp. Co., 22 Okla. 377 , 97 Pac. 1003 ; Winslow v. … (Board of County *734 Com’rs of Beaver County v. Beaver County ex rel. Spohn, 45 Okla. 526 , 146 Pac. 434 .)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. State Industrial Commission

    178 Okla. 375 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1936

    Brown, 176 Okla. 201 , 55 P. (2d) 129 : *378 condition. E. G. Fike Co. v. Vice, 158 Okla. 243 , 13 P. (2d) 143 ; Boardman & Co. v. Clark, 166 Okla. 194 , 26 P. (2d) 906 ; U. S. F. & G. Co. v. … As said in Union Indemnity Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re Assessment of Property of Western Light & Power Corp.

    169 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1934

    The assessment was made in that amount by the State Board of Equalization. … Travis v. Dickey, Co. Treas., et al., 96 Okla. 256 , 222 P. 527 ; Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Wakefield, 247 U. S. 350 , 62 L. Ed. 1154 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hatfield v. Jimerson

    365 P.2d 980 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1961

    Plaintiff cites Myers v. Board of Supervisors, 156 Miss. 251 , 125 So. 718 , in support of her position. We do not consider that *983 decision applicable. … As pointed out in our decision in Wilds v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Manwell v. Grimes

    48 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1915

    by Pah-pah-me-na-ko-tho, leaving a balance due from Brown to the three former Indians of four hundred and twenty-three ($423.00) dollars, there is deposited herewith by said Brown with said Thackery for said Indians the … As said by Justice Harlan in United States v. Rickert, 188 U. S. 432 , 23 Sup. Ct. 478, 47 L.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • GRAHAM v. REYNOLDS

    2024 OK CIV APP 26 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 2024

    Brown Drake, L.L.C ., 477 P.3d 283 , 286-87 (Mont. 2020). … Brown, L.L.C. , 515 P.3d 837 (Nev. 2022) (Bylaws' provisions restricting the units to "single family residential purposes only" did not prohibit rentals); New Hampshire - Town of Conway v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Cameron v. Jones

    165 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1933

    Parr [Colo.] 130 P. 618 ; Davis v. Wilson [Art.] 35 S. W. (2d) 1020 ; Avery v. Hale [Ga.] 145 S. E. 76 ; Osgood v. Jones, 60 N. H. 543; Fleming v. Guthrie, Judge [W. Va.] 9 S. E. 23 ; Alderson v. Commissioners [W. … Bentley et al. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Questions Submitted by: The Honorable Melissa Provenzano, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 79

    2025 OK AG 17 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 11, 2025

    Cox v. State , 2004 OK 17 87 P.3d 607 See also Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 1982 OK 74 648 P.2d 26 Liddell v. Heavner , 2008 OK 6 180 P.3d 1191 Signature Leasing v. … Those charges are expressly reserved for the CEQA, the State Board, and a local school district board of education. 70 O.S.Supp.2025, §§ 3-104 70 O.S.2021, § 5-117 Marley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Black v. Geissler

    58 Okla. 335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1916

    Smith v. Board of Com’rs, 26 Okla. 819 , 110 Pac. 669 ; Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co., 32 Okla. 784 , 124 Pac. 324 ; Fast et al. v. Rogers, County Treasurer, 30 Okla. 289 , 119 Pac. 241 ; Harris et al. v. … Smith et al. v. Board Com’rs, 26 Okla. 819 , 110 Pac. 669 ; *344 Fast et al. v. Rogers, 80 Okla. 289 , 119 Pac. 241 ; Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co., 32 Okla. 784 , 124 Pac. 324 ; Turner et al. v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.