Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
7.11s
West Shore Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
92 N.J.L. 648 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 6, 1919
Cited 1 timesPublishedBorough of Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals
127 N.J.L. 226 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 19, 1941
Cited 1 timesPublishedVillage of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen County Board of Taxation
33 N.J. 262 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1960
Village of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen County Board of Taxation, 31 N. J. 420 (1960). … In City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 31 N.
Cited 11 timesPublishedPetranto v. New Jersey State Board of Barber Examiners
125 N.J.L. 391 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 10, 1940
Gottuso v. Baker, 80 N. J. L. 520. … State Board, &c., of Dentistry, 118 N. J. L. 384, and Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U. S. 608 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedLivingston v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners
81 N.J. 406 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 23, 1979
Cited 2 timesPublishedCadmus v. LONG BRANCH BOARD OF EDUCATION AND INDUSTRIAL ASSOCS.
155 N.J. Super. 42 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 21, 1977
CADMUS, PLAINTIFF, v. LONG BRANCH BOARD OF EDUCATION AND INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATES, A PARTNERSHIP, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided December 21, 1977. *44 Mr. Richard D. … See National Spring Co. v. Pierpont Associates, Inc., 146 N.J. Super. 63, 67-68 (Law Div. 1976). Defendant board's motion for summary judgment is therefore granted.
Cited 8 timesPublishedJohn Maneely Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals
22 N.J. Misc. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 24, 1944
Upon an examination of the facts and the law of this case we aré of the view that the matter was correctly decided by the State Board of Tax Appeals of New Jersey' whose opinion is reported in 21 N. J. Mis. R. 229. … The writ of certiorari is therefore dismissed and the tax judgment affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the State Board of Tax Appeals of New Jersey.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMahler v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Fair Lawn
55 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 1, 1969
MAHLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN AND THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued November 17, 1969. … Floyd V. Amoresano, attorney). PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHuber v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SEC.
54 N.J. 106 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 13, 1969
HUBER, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. May 13, 1969. Messrs.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCollege of Mecca v. State Board of Medical Examiners
113 N.J.L. 327 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 27, 1934
Cited 1 timesPublishedLehigh Valley Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
102 N.J.L. 576 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1926
The fact that the company had not returned the property to the state board *579 of taxes and assessment for assessment does not decide the question, citing Jersey City v. Board of Equalization of Taxes, 74 N. J. L. 382. … Trenton, &c., Traction Corp. v. Mercer County Board of Taxation, 92 N. J. L. 398. The assessments to be sustained must be based upon evidence. Gibbs v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 101 N. J. L. 371.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAllied Realty, Ltd. v. Borough of Upper Saddle River
221 N.J. Super. 407 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 30, 1987
See, e.g., Charlie Brown of Chatham v. Board of Adjustment, 202 N.J. Super. 312, 327 (App.Div. 1985); Springsteel et al. v. Town of West Orange, et al., 149 N.J. … Charlie Brown of Chatham v. Board of Adjustment, supra, 202 N.J. Super. at 327 .
Cited 30 timesPublishedJ.K. v. New Jersey State Parole Board (084035) (Statewide)
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 2021
J.K. v. … , or unreasonable: Sanchez v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMiddlesex Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
6 N.J. Misc. 51 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 17, 1928
L. 1918, p. 304), the Supreme Court of New Jersey, on certiorari, can only review the order of the board as to facts found in the testimony, adduced before the board. … or in part when it clearly appears there was no evidence before the board to support reasonably the same, or that the same was without 'the jurisdiction of the board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 7, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY EDMOND BROWN, Plaintiff … v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986).
Cited 0 timesUnknownCity of Hoboken v. State Board of Tax Appeals
127 N.J.L. 179 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 1941
Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Rahway, 75 N. J. L. 416; Central Railroad Co. v. State Tax Department, 112 Id. 5, 15; Atlantic City v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 Id. 464. … Reliance is placed on the case of City of Hoboken v. State Board of Taxes and Assessments, supra. But that case is not appropos.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCity of Millville v. Cumberland County Board of Taxation
62 N.J. 278 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 7, 1973
Cited 2 timesPublishedGauli v. Board of Trustees of Police & Firemen's Retirement System
143 N.J. Super. 480 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 10, 1976
Fromm v. Bd. Directors of Police, etc., Retirem. Syst., 81 N. J. Super. 138 (App. Div. 1963). … Plunkett v. Hoboken Pension Comm’rs, 113 N. J. L. 230, 234 (Sup. Ct. 1934), aff’d o. b. 114 N. J. L. 273 (E. & A. 1935). And see, Pfitzinger v. Bd. of Trustees, etc., Retirem. Syst., 62 N. J. Super. 589 (Law Div. 1960).
Cited 7 timesPublishedSunrise Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
162 N.J. 483 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 19, 1999
It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and in light of the time of decision rule, the matter is summarily remanded to the Zoning Board of Adjustment to permit plaintiff to make application for a conditional … See, Coventry Square, Inc. v. Westwood Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 138 N.J. 285, 292-298 , 650 A.2d 340 (1994). Jurisdiction is not retained.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorthgate Condominium Association, Inc. v. Borough of Hillside Planning Board
208 N.J. 336 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 9, 2011
27 A.3d 950 (2011) 208 N.J. 336 NORTHGATE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. BOROUGH OF HILLSIDE PLANNING BOARD. Nos. C-1063 September Term 2010, 067794 Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 9, 2011.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna