Case law

Perrin v. Kitzhaber

191 Or. App. 439 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 21, 2004

Finally, Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 532 US 598 , 121 S Ct 1835 , 149 L Ed 2d 855 (2001), is also instructive. … Del Rio, 67 SW3d 85, 88 (Tex 2001) (when concurrent suits are filed in state and federal court, Growe requires the federal court to defer *444 to the state process); Brown v.

Tompkins v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.

77 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1915

should have been given: Zurcher v. … Supp. 490 ); Dudley v. Front Street Cable Ry. Co. (C. C.), 73 Fed. 128 ; Devroe v. Portland R., L. & P. Co., 64 Or. 547, 556 ( 131 Pac. 304 ). 3.

Wantowski v. Crown Cork & Seal

175 Or. App. 609 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 2001

After the Board issued its decision, the Supreme Court established a different test for determining whether an injured worker’s compensable condition actually worsened. See SAIF v. … Consequently, we are unable to adequately review the Board’s conclusion that no objective evidence supported claimant’s aggravation claim. Iles v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 173 Or App 254 , 21 P3d 195 (2001).

Brenner v. Industrial Indemnity Co.

30 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 18, 1977

Stevens v. SAIF, 20 Or App 412 , 531 P2d 921 (1975); Hill v. U.S. Plywood-Champion, 12 Or App 1 , 503 P2d 728 (1972), Sup Ct review denied (1973); Bailey v. Morrison-Knudsen, 5 Or App 592, 485 P2d 1254 (1971). … . * * *” In Tanner v.

SAIF Corp. v. Hoffman

193 Or. App. 750 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 2004

Willamette Industries, Inc. v. Titus, 151 Or App 76, 80 , 950 P2d 318 (1997) (citing Roseburg Forest Products v. Long, 325 Or 305, 309 , 937 P2d 517 (1997)). … (quoting Spurlock v. International Paper Co., 89 Or App 461, 465 , 749 P2d 611 (1988)).

Shubert v. Blue Chips

151 Or. App. 710 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1997

As we held in our decision in Gallino v. … Shubert v. Department of Consumer and Business Services, CA No. A86479, dismissed May 17, 1995, citing ORS 183.400(1). We adhere to that holding.

Perez v. Employment Department

164 Or. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 15, 1999

Linville v. Employment Dept., 146 Or App 317, 323 , 934 P2d 442 (1997). … Relying principally on Bunnell v.

Eilers v. McCormick

121 Or. 309 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1927

BROWN, J. It is evident from the assignments of error that this case presents questions of fact only. … The testimony of the plaintiff -is to the effect that he was voted off the board of directors of Eilers Music House, and that an attempt was made to put him off the board of directors of Graves & Company.

Simon v. Durham

10 Or. 52 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

Board of Can vassers, 36 Wis., 498 ; Luce v. Mayhew, 13 Gray, 83 . … (State v. County Judge, 7 Iowa, 201 ; Ingerson v. Berry, 14 Ohio St., 324 .)

Toole ex rel. Professional Liability Fund v. EBI Companies

108 Or. App. 57 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 1991

We upheld the Board without discussing its authority to decide the issue. In EBI Companies v. … We have held that the Board has no authority to modify third party action settlement agreements. See SAIF v. Cowart, supra, 65 Or App at 738 ; see also Estate of Troy Vance v.

Sothras v. Employment Division

48 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1980

One of these two Board members, relying on our decision in Arias v. … In McPherson v.

Dailey v. University of Portland

340 Or. App. 80 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 2025

See Two Two v. … See Curtis v.

State v. Peterson

309 Or. App. 31 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 2021

State v. … Marvin v.

Capps v. Mines Service, Inc.

175 Or. 248 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1944

Berry, 8 How. 544 , quoted with approval in Coulter v. Portland Trust Co., 20 Or. 469, 481 , 26 P. 565 , 27 P. 266 . To the same effect see Brown v. Laird, 134 Or. 150, 156 , 291 P. 352 , 73 A. L. R. 877; Freeman v. … Brown v. Laird, supra, 134 Or. at p. 160 , and cases there cited. It follows that the decree of the circuit court was right, and it is affirmed.

SAIF Corp. v. Kollias

233 Or. App. 499 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 2010

Coleman v. SAIF, 203 Or App 442, 446 , 125 P3d 845 (2005). … See Cole/Dinsmore v. DMV, 336 Or 565, 584 , 87 P3d 1120 (2004) (the proponent of a fact in a contested case hearing has the burden to prove it).

School District Number Two v. Lambert

28 Or. 209 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1895

“If the demand for which the warrant is drawn,” says Norton, J., in Keller v. … “The duty is ministerial, ” says Clopton, J., in Grider v. Tally, 77 Ala. 422 ( 54 Am.

Metje v. Pub. Emps. Ret. Sys.

291 Or. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 2018

As we explained in Harris v. Dept. of Public Safety Standards , 287 Or. App. 111 , 113, 400 P.3d 1032 , rev. den. , 362 Or. 94 , 405 P.3d 152 (2017), and Lucke v. DPSST , 247 Or. … the board has commenced proceedings to recover the payment.

Beck v. James River Corp.

124 Or. App. 484 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

In Roseburg Forest Products v. … Accord Roseburg Forest Products v. Ferguson, supra; c.f. SAIF v. Drews, 318 Or 1 , 860 P2d 254 (1993); Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Pitzer, 123 Or App 1 , 858 P2d 886 (1993); Tektronix, Inc. v.

State v. Turner

34 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1898

the tow : Wilson v. … In Chapman v. Jackson, 9 Rich.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Young

219 Or. App. 410 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 16, 2008

See also Gray v. … Co. v.