Case law

Tobler's Flowers, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

632 S.W.2d 15 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1982

Joseph v. Howell, 607 S.W.2d 799 (Mo.App.1980); Satterfield v. Winston Industries, Inc., 607 S.W.2d 798 (Mo.App.1980); Brown v. Crow, 564 S.W.2d 599 (Mo.App.1978). The concurring opinion in Pennell v. … v.

Boyd v. Kansas City

291 Mo. 622 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1922

The city could not delegate the exercise of governmental powers to a ministerial body like the Board of Public Works. [Ruggles v. Collier, 43 Mo. 353 ; St. Louis v. Clemens, 43 Mo. 395 ; Bigelow v. Springfield, 162 S.W. … Ragland, C., concurs; Brown, C., not sitting.

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Housing Authority of Kansas City

849 S.W.2d 588 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 1993

Montijo also provided FMCC with a copy of the minutes of the April 13, 1988, meeting of the Board of Commissioners of HAKC, which memorialized the Board’s discussion about the purchase of the new computer system and the resolution … Burden v. Burden, 811 S.W.2d 818, 822 (Mo.App.1991) (citing Brown v. Brown, 495 S.W.2d 89, 92 (Mo.App.1973)).

State v. Goeman

386 S.W.3d 873 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2012

Brown had not noticed any sliding of them vehicle as “the roads weren’t bad like that.” As the Joneses and the Browns approached a curved portion of Route 160 near its intersection with Highway H, Mrs. … Brown saw “the black car cross over the [center] line and hit the red car head-on.” Mrs. Brown drove her vehicle into the ditch on the opposite side of the road to avoid hitting the other two cars. Mrs.

Harkless v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

151 Mo. App. 463 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1910

[Cross v. Railroad, 56 Mo. App. 644 ; Gardner v. Railroad, 117 Mo. App. 138 .] … [Holt v. Railroad, supra; Gates v. Railroad, 125 Mo. App., 334 ; Brown v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 588 .] Instruction No. 4 given for plaintiff authorized the jury to return a verdict for punitive damages.

Gardner v. Eldridge

149 Mo. App. 210 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1910

[Ruschenberg v. Southern Electric Railroad Company, 161 Mo. 70, 81 , 61 S. W. 626 ; McCormick v. City of St. Louis, 166 Mo. 315, 338 , 65 S. W. 1038 ; Gage v. Trawick, 94 Mo. App. 307 , 68 S. W. 85 .] … [Mead v. Arnold, 131 Mo. App. 214, 222 , 110 S. W. 656 ; but this case does not stand upon that proposition.]

State v. Myers

351 Mo. 332 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1943

[State v. Meadows, 331 Mo. 533 , 55 S. … [State v. Smith, (Mo.), 222 S.

Chambers and Pouncey v. Met. Life Ins. Co.

235 Mo. App. 884 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1940

[See Houston v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 97 S. W. (2d) 856 ; Doran v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co., 116 S. W. (2d) 172 ; Brown v. Met. Life Ins. Co., supra.] … Law, p. 4958; Brown v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., supra; Dorna v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., supra.]

Browning v. Richardson

186 Mo. 361 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1905

Browning, Edward W. Dewey, James A. Bingham, John S. Browning, William H. Browning, H. K. Browning, Francis King, and C. E. … administering the partnership estate, is an amendment to the original section, adopted in 1885 (Laws 1885, p. 25), enacted doubtless to suply a casus omissus in the original section disclosed by the decision in Gregory v.

In re the Marriage of Thomas Leon Harris and Melanie Berlier Harris THOMAS LEON HARRIS v. MELANIE BERLIER HARRIS, Respondent-Respondent.

446 S.W.3d 320 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 2014

Section 512.160.1, RSMo 2000; see also Rule 84.18. “ ‘An issue that was never presented to or decided by the trial court is not preserved for appellate review.’ ” Brown v. … Brown, 423 S.W.3d 784, 788 (Mo. banc 2014) (quoting State ex rel Nixon v. Am. Tobacco Co., Inc., 34 S.W.3d 122, 129 (Mo. banc 2000)).

Kimberlin v. Gordon

139 Mo. App. 464 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1909

Brown in trust for Lorenxo L. Chappelle to secure $425.” … [Smith v. Bunn, 75 Mo. 559 ; Duffey v. Willis, 99 Mo. 132 .]

State Ex Inf. Nixon v. Kinder

89 S.W.3d 454 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 26, 2002

V, sec. 10. … V, sec. 4(1).

Turner ex rel. Forrester v. Whyman

411 S.W.2d 132 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1967

Brown blocked up the hole to keep them from coming back in. Brown called defendant, but instead of coming up and inspecting the attic, he sent a check, received by Brown, he thought, on the day plaintiff was hurt. … The act of engaging plaintiff and his friend, Donald, is that of Brown. Defendant agreed to pay Brown (and him only) if he would get the pigeons out of the attic. The here applicable rule is in Oatman v. St.

State ex rel. Vaught v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

270 Mo. 251 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1917

BROWN, C. — This is a suit for taxes amounting to $574.12, with penalties and attorneys’ fees, in which the judgment was for the plaintiff. … [State v. Gamble, 108 Mo. 500 .]

State v. Collins

816 S.W.2d 257 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1991

In Coolidge v. … United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696, 701-702 , 103 S.Ct. 2637, 2641 , 77 L.Ed.2d 110, 117 (1983); Brown, supra 460 U.S. at 748 , 103 S.Ct. at 1546 .

Sparks v. Dispatch Transfer Co.

104 Mo. 531 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

The same question came before the same court again in 1863, in Brown v. Parker, 7 Allen, 337 . In that case one N. H. … Martin v. Fewell, 79 Mo. 401 ; Richardson v. Pitts, 71 Mo. 128 . It remains only to notice Franklin Avenue German Saving Institution v. Board of Education, 75 Mo. 408 .

State v. Nerzinger

220 Mo. 36 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 18, 1909

The strength of the acid was attested by the fact that it left brown spots where drops of it struck the board fence at the mouth of the alley where the offense was committed. … In Lawhead v.

Kraus v. Standard Insurance Co.

395 S.W.3d 88 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2013

Kathleen Kraus (Kraus) appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Standard Insurance Company, Thomas Brown, and Scott Martin on Kraus’ petition alleging negligence, misrepresentation, negligent infliction

Lake Ozark-Osage Beach Joint Sewer Board v. Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Land Reclamation Commission and Magruder Limestone Co., Inc.

491 S.W.3d 667 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 2016

following our remand in Lake Ozark/Osage Beach Joint Sewer Board v. … Albanna v.

Thompson v. Wooldridge

102 Mo. 505 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1890

Smith v. St. Joseph (1870), 45 Mo. 449 ; Henslee v. Cannefax, (1872), 49 Mo. 295 ; Howell v. Reynolds County (1872), 51 Mo. 154 ; Meader v. Malcolm (1883), 78 Mo. 550 ; Heath v. Goslin (1883), 80 Mo. 310 . II. … It operated to pass the record title of Brown to plaintiff, in the absence of any notice by the latter of any limitations on its apparent effect. Munson v. Ensor (1887), 94 Mo. 504 .