Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

2.20s

  • Androscoggin Water Power Co. v. Bethel Steam Mill Co.

    64 Me. 441 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1875

    In Benson v. … The construction of a somewhat similar statute came before the court in Cumberland & Oxford Canal Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dubie v. Branz

    146 Me. 455 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 4, 1950

    In McPheters v. … Great Northern Manufacturing Co. v. Brown, 113, Me. 51, 53, 92 A. 993 . Fraud vitiates all contracts into which it enters, verbal or written. Warren v. Kimball, 59 Me. 264, 266 ; Stewart v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Pleasant Hill Cemetery v. Davis

    76 Me. 289 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 10, 1884

    Guild v. Holbrook, 11 Pick. 101 ; Canal Bank v. Cox, 6 Maine, 395; Jacobs v. Remsen, 36 N. Y. Appeal, 668. In the case of Bartlett v. … In Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Curry v. PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY

    159 Me. 305 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 25, 1963

    Ct. of New Jersey 1961), affirmed 177 A. (2nd) 538 (1962) ; National Labor Relations Board v. … Revised seniority rosters to be posted on bulletin boards each year. * * * 2 Article 32 Reduction of Force. “When reducing forces seniority rights shall govern.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. LaPlante

    534 A.2d 959 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 4, 1987

    State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985); see *964 also State v. West, 504 A.2d 622, 625 (Me. 1986); State v. Anair, 499 A.2d 152, 154 (Me.1985). … At trial, the only description given of the robber was that he was 5'3"-5'9'’, wearing a beige or brown jacket, with a stocking over his head and wearing glasses.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Bayberry Cove Children's Land Trust v. Town of Steuben

    180 A.3d 119 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 27, 2018

    Brown v. Warchalowski , 471 A.2d 1026 , 1029 (Me. 1984) ; see also 23 M.R.S. § 3023. … See Sturtevant v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Portland v. Fisherman's Wharf Associates II

    541 A.2d 160 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 27, 1988

    Under the criteria we set forth in Thomas v. … Poire v. Manchester, 506 A.2d 1160, 1163-64 (Me.1986).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Superintendent of Insurance

    638 A.2d 67 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 14, 1994

    International Paper Co. v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 629 A.2d 597, 599 (Me.1993). … See State v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State v. Kremen

    2000 Me. 117 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 21, 2000

    Brown, 1997 ME 90, ¶ 5 , 694 A.2d 453, 455 , the expiration of the officer’s previously valid certification would likely have little impact on the court’s determination of whether that standard had been met. [¶ 6] Kremen … See Dunaway v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State

    153 Me. 469 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 13, 1958

    Do any of the provisions of Sections 1 and 2 of Legislative Document 1637 delegate legislative power to the State Board of Education and the School District Commission in violation of Section 1 of Part First of Article IV … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parlin v. G. H. Bass & Co.

    423 A.2d 948 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1980

    In the words of our recent opinion in Axelsen v. S. D. … Willette v. Statler Tissue Corp., Me., 331 A.2d 365, 370 (1975). See also Pottle v. Brown, Me., 408 A.2d 1011, 1013 (1979). The entry will be: Employee’s attempted appeal in Parlin v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Goulandris Bros. v. British Iron & Steel Corp.

    36 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 27, 1941

    But this argument is disposed of by the cases of Geipel v. Smith, L.R. 7 Q.B. 404, and Rodoconachi v. … Quina Export Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Fletcher

    16 Me. 63 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1839

    In the case of Whitney v. Olney, 3 Mason, 280 , the devise was of a moiety of “ two paper mills,” and “ appurtenances.” Mr. … The jury have found, that the demanded premises have been used as a mill yard for depositing logs and boards and were necessary as a privilege for the enjoyment and use of the mill. Judgment on the verdict.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Roussel

    760 A.2d 1062 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 27, 2000

    See State v. Gray, 2000 ME 145, ¶ 25 , 755 A.2d 540, 546 ; State v. … Brown, 2000 ME 25, ¶ 7 , 757 A.2d 768, 770-71 . [¶ 9] In this case, the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion that Roussel assisted Farrar in growing and cultivating the marijuana plants in the woods as

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Walter A. Wood & Co. v. Finson

    89 Me. 459 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 18, 1897

    Assumpsit for the sale of burning oil, to be delivered free on board vessel in Boston. … Trainer v. Morison, 78 Maine, 163; Methuen Co. v. Mayes, 33 Maine, 169.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Keybank National Association v. Estate of Eula W. Quint

    176 A.3d 717 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 21, 2017

    See State v. Dilley, 2008 ME 5, ¶ 25, 938 A.2d 804; State v. … See Teel v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • International Paper Co. v. a & a BROCHU

    899 F. Supp. 715 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 11, 1995

    Brown, Co., 645 A.2d 606, 608 (Me.1994); Beverage v. Cumberland Farms Inc., 502 A.2d 486, 489 (Me.1985). … See 39 M.R.S.A. § 4; 39-A M.R.S.A. § 104; 39 M.R.S.A. § 28; 39-A M.R.S.A. § 408; see also Li v. C.N. Brown Co., 645 A.2d 606, 607, n. 1 (Me.1994). Thus cases interpreting those provisions continue to control. 2 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pollack v. Regional School Unit 75

    12 F. Supp. 3d 173 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 31, 2014

    The Court analyzes these merits-based arguments below, along with the Fourth Amendment unreasonable search claim stated in Count V and the First Amendment challenge of the District school board’s commenting policy stated … V.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Burgess v. M/V Tamano

    382 F. Supp. 351 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 26, 1974

    Burgess v. M/V TAMANO, 370 F. Supp. 247 (D.Me.1973). 3 . … Cocherl v. State of Alaska, 246 F. Supp. 328 (D.Alas.1965); Huckins v. Board of Regents of University of Michigan, 263 F.Supp. 622 (E.D.Mich.1967); Rivet v. East Point Marine Corp., 325 F.Supp. 1265 (S.D.Ala.1971).

    Reversed on other grounds by Ernest E. Burgess v. M/v Tamano, Appeal of United States of America, 564 F.2d 964 (1977)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • The Ajax

    34 F.2d 45 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 20, 1929

    The certificate could have been taken at any time by young Doyen, and he acted as director by participating in meetings of the board. … Norfolk *47 Sand & Cement Co. v. Owen (C. C. A.) 115 F. 778 ; The Key City, 14 Wall. 653 , 20 L. Ed. 896 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.