Case law

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

105 N.J.L. 349 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1929

The tax was assessed by the state board of taxes and assessment under authority conferred upon it by the provisions of the Eailroad Tax act of 1888 {Comp.

Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Ass'n v. Board of Education

3 N.J. Misc. 660 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 3, 1925

City of Linden v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

3 N.J. Misc. 691 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 22, 1925

Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

4 N.J. Misc. 838 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1926

This case is controlled by the case of the Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 4 N. J. Mis. R. 567, decided the present May term of the court.

Rahway Valley Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

5 N.J. Misc. 338 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 10, 1927

It is objected that this is improper practice and that we should consider no evidence except that taken before the board. … the parties and conferring jurisdiction on the board should receive careful examination.

City of Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals

125 N.J.L. 187 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 23, 1940

The valuations have gone through the statutory course— made by the local assessors, appealed to the county board of taxation and again appealed to the state board. … The state board in every instance reduced the assessment below that fixed by either the assessors or the county board; and inasmuch as the testimony was taken before a single member, the board finding really rests upon the

Newark Adams Associates, LLC v. Sumo Enterprises, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 9, 2025

or Board of Adjustment . . . ." … or Board of Adjustment."

Rutgers University Student Assembly (Rusa) v. Middlesex County Board of Elections

438 N.J. Super. 93 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 2014

Defendants' citation to two federal district court cases, Diaz v. Cobb, 541 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (S.D. Fla. 2008), and Acorn v. Bysiewicz, 413 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D. … [Curtis v.

Foster-Hyatt Group of Companies v. West Caldwell Planning Board

174 N.J. Super. 10 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 9, 1980

The application was made to the planning board pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-60(a). See Cranmer v. Evesham Tp., 162 N.J.Super. 204, 210-213 (Law Div. 1978). The property in question is located in a B-3 commercial zone. … We here only decide that the board’s adherence to the current B-3 zoning scheme was not arbitrary and capricious in this case. See Wallington Home Owners v.

City of Camden v. Camden County Board of Taxation

121 N.J.L. 262 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 29, 1938

The prosecutor of this writ complains that the Camden County Board of Taxation erred in cancelling taxes and assessments for the year 1937, upon property of the Abraham Browning Council No. 133, Junior *263 Order United American … Newark v. State Board, 9 N. J. Mis. R. 599. All of the requirements of the statute are met.

Taber v. State Board of Registration & Examination in Dentistry

135 N.J.L. 255 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 18, 1947

Levin v. State Board, 121 N. J. L. 193; Liggett Co. v. Baldridge, 278 U. S. 105, 113 . The suspension is set aside.

Atlantic Container, Inc. v. Township of Eagleswood Planning Board

312 N.J. Super. 213 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1997

The court is not bound to give deference to the Board’s decision in this area. Cherney v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 221 N.J.Super. 141, 144-45 , 534 A.2d 41 (App.Div.1987); Grancagnola v. … Caputo v. The Best Foods, 17 N.J. 259, 263-65 , 111 A.2d 261 (1955); Clifton v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 28 N.J. 411, 421 , 147 A.2d 1 (1958).

Fejoku v. Prudential Life Ins. Co. of Am., Inc.

236 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 2018

Simon v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System

117 N.J. 652 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 19, 1989

State v. Haring

55 N.J.L. 327 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1893

any county public road board, which then existed or might thereafter exist in any county, shall consist of members of the board of .chosen freeholders of such county, to be appointed by the said board of chosen freeholders … State v. Clayton, 24 Vroom 277, 282 . The result is that the judgment below must be affirmed. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Garrison, Magie, Van Syokel, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith. 10.

McGee v. Board of Trustees of Public Employees' Retirement System

45 N.J. 576 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 25, 1965

Board of Trustees, etc., 49 N. J. Super. 309, 319 (App. Div. 1958). But compare Wagner v. Board of Trustees of the Public Employees’ Retirement System, 87 N. J. Super. 498 (App. Div. 1965), certiorari denied 45 N. … Upon our view of the entire record, the Board had adequate basis for so finding and therefore we shall not disturb its determination. Cf. Atkinson v. Parsekian, 37 N. J. 143, 149, 96 A. L. R. 2d 602 (1962); Close v.

Mayor of Jersey City v. State Board of Assessors

75 N.J.L. 571 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1908

It is now insisted by the plaintiffs in error that these three parcels were properly assessed as main stem under the principle adopted by this court in Jersey City v. … State Board of Assessors and Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 45 Vroom 720 , reversing S. C., 44 Id. 170.

Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

90 N.J.L. 703 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 24, 1917

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, &c., No. 48 of the present term of 'this court.

Chang v. Board of Educ. of Glen Ridge Tp.

685 F. Supp. 96 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 9, 1988

During the 1986-87 academic year, the defendant, Glen Ridge Board of Education (the “Board”), placed Jason in a pre-school handicapped program operated by the Verona Board of Education at its F.N. Brown School. … Simon)) (footnote omitted); School Board of Prince William County v.

In re Brown

218 N.J. 387 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 28, 2014

BROWN of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986; And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated … XIV-2012-00408E; And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule l:20-16(e); And good cause