Case law

Brown

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 23, 2025

P. 41(b); see also Link v. Wabash R.R. … v.

Smith v. State

207 S.W.3d 228 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2006

Officer Brown also testified. … Coday v. State, 179 S.W.3d 343, 352 (Mo.App.2005); see also Hill v.

Lauber-Clayton, LLC v. Novus Properties Co.

407 S.W.3d 612 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 2013

Browne also developed and owned this shopping center. … Tinnon v. Mueller, 846 S.W.2d 752, 759 (Mo.App. E.D.1993); Singer v. Siedband, 138 S.W.3d 750, 754 (Mo.App. E.D.2004); Watson v. Watson, 562 S.W.2d 329 , 331 n. 2 (Mo.1978).

State v. Davis

686 S.W.2d 503 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1985

State v. Burnau, 642 S.W.2d 621, 623 (Mo. banc 1982); State v. Giffin, 640 S.W.2d 128, 130 (Mo.1982). We are not to weigh the evidence. … State v. Franco, 544 S.W.2d 533 (Mo.banc 1976); State v. Thomas, 452 S.W.2d 160, 162 (Mo.1970); State v. Ramsey, 368 S.W.2d 413, 416 (Mo. 1963).

State Ex Rel. Chiavola v. Village of Oakwood

886 S.W.2d 74 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1994

See e.g., Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper Pike, 63 Ohio App.2d 34 , 409 N.E.2d 258, 280 (1979); Bruno v. Brown, 414 Pa. 361 , 200 A.2d 405 (1964). … Board of County Comm’rs, 531 P.2d 351, 357 (Okla.App.1974); Bruno v. Brown, 414 Pa. 361 , 200 A.2d 405 (1964); Bell v. Elkhorn, 122 Wis.2d 558 , 364 N.W.2d 144 (1985).

Mulrooney v. Irish-American Savings & Building Ass'n

249 Mo. 629 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1913

[Ringo v. Richardson, 53 Mo. 385 ; Smith v. Smith, 201 Mo. 533 ; Bunel v. Nester, 203 Mo. 429 .] In the case of Bobb v. … Brown, P. J., and Walher, J., concur.

Glass v. First National Bank of St. Louis

191 S.W.3d 662 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 16, 2006

The dissenting opinion of Judge Price attempts to rewrite this Court’s opinions in *667 Garr v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 187 S.W.3d 457 (Mo. banc 2004), and Brown v. … Brown v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp., 150 S.W.3d 287, 288 (Mo. banc 2004). . Garr, 137 S.W.3d at 460 ; Brown, 150 S.W.3d at 288 . . Brown, 150 S.W.3d at 288 . . Garr, 137 S.W.3d at 460 . . Brown, 150 S.W.3d at 288 . .

Greene County v. State

926 S.W.2d 701 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1996

It cites the case of Fowler v. Board of Regents for the Central Missouri State University, 637 S.W.2d 352 (Mo.App.1982) in support of its claim. We find the Fowler case to be inapposite. … The State alternatively cites Molasky v.

Davis v. Wieland

557 S.W.3d 340 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2018

Schwartz was permissible under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Hamid , 856 S.W.2d 51 (Mo. banc 1993). … Hunter v. Moore , 486 S.W.3d 919 , 925 (Mo. banc 2016). With respect to Attorneys' contact with Dr. Schwartz, they argue the contact was permissible under the holding in Brown v.

Stanton v. Jones

332 Mo. 631 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 20, 1933

[Ward v. Fessler, 252 S. W. (Mo.) 667, l. c. 671; Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 55 , 27 S. W. 644 ; Powell v. Railroad, 255 Mo. 420, 454 , 164 S. W. 628 .] … In Barr v.

State v. Stacy

121 S.W.3d 328 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 2003

Stacy and his uncle, Jeffrey Brown. Mr. Brown noticed Officer Hodges and directed Mr. Stacy’s attention to Officer Hodges. Mr. Stacy looked in the direction of Officer Hodges. Mr. … Brown stopped walking and looked at Officer Hodges. Mr. Stacy and Mr. Brown then approached the patrol car.

Wolfgeher v. Wagner Cartage Service, Inc.

646 S.W.2d 781 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1983

Section 287.800; Hickey v. Board of Education, 363 Mo. 1039 , 256 S.W.2d 775, 777 [5] (Mo.1953); Alexander v. Pin Oaks Nursing Home, 625 S.W.2d at 193 [1]; Greer v. … Bess v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 469 S.W.2d 40, 45 (Mo.App.1971); Tines v. Brown Shoe Co., 290 S.W.2d 200, 202 (Mo.App.1956); Cf. Harper v. Kast Metals Corp., 397 So.2d 529 (La.Ct.App.1981); Worden v.

Teasley v. Forler

548 F. Supp. 2d 694 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 10, 2008

The command staff would then have an "oral board" interview with the applicant. ( Id. at p. 226). … Bd. of County Comm'rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 411 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

State ex rel. Vaught v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

270 Mo. 251 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1917

BROWN, C. — This is a suit for taxes amounting to $574.12, with penalties and attorneys’ fees, in which the judgment was for the plaintiff. … [State v. Gamble, 108 Mo. 500 .]

State v. Griffin

289 S.W.2d 455 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1956

State v. Magruder, Mo. App., 219 S.W. 700 ; State v. Brown, Mo. App., 293 S.W. 87 ; State v. Egan, Mo.App., 272 S.W.2d 719 . The defendant assigns as error the giving of an instruction designated, as No. 2. … State v. Spinks, 344 Mo. 105 , 125 S.W.2d 60 ; State v. «Gruber, Mo.Sup., 285 S-.W. 426; State v. Leonard, Mo.Sup., 182 S.W.2d 548 ; State v. Jackson, Mo.App., 220 S.W.2d 779 .

State ex rel. Jefferson County v. Watson

867 S.W.2d 223 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 18, 1993

Hord v. Morgan, 769 S.W.2d 443,448 (Mo.App.1989). The issue in determining whether a particular witness is an expert is not whether others are better qualified. Seabaugh v. … In Thummel v.

O'Neal v. Stone

79 Mo. App. 279 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1899

In Andrews v. … Kaut v. Kessler, 114 Pa. St. 603; Clark v. Washburn, 1 Ohio St. 244 . In Lyon v.

City of St. Louis v. Eskridge

486 S.W.2d 648 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1972

State v. Brown, 306 Mo. 532 , 267 S.W. 864, 865 , quoting from State v. O’Brien, 74 Mo. 549 , l. c. 551. See also State v. Bockstruck, 136 Mo. 335 , 38 S.W. 317 ; State v. Price, 229 Mo. 670 , 129 S.W. 650 ; State v. … Smith, 233 Mo. 242 , l. c. 253, 135 S.W. 465 ; State v. Bess, 20 Mo. 419 ; State v. Shiflett, 20 Mo. 415 ; State v. Zammar, Mo., 305 S.W.2d 441 (quoting with approval State v. O’ Brien, supra); State v.

Kavadas v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.

263 S.W.2d 736 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1954

Webb then prepared a statement of facts relating to the injury, the release in question and a form required by the Railroad Retirement Board, all three of which were signed by .plaintiff. … Brown v. Trimble, 324 Mo. 353 , 23 S.W.2d 162 ; Gimmarro v. Kansas City, 342 Mo. 428 , 116 S.W.2d 11 ; and Houghtaling v. Banfield, Mo.App., 8 S.W.2d 1023 .

Gardner v. Eldridge

149 Mo. App. 210 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1910

[Ruschenberg v. Southern Electric Railroad Company, 161 Mo. 70, 81 , 61 S. W. 626 ; McCormick v. City of St. Louis, 166 Mo. 315, 338 , 65 S. W. 1038 ; Gage v. Trawick, 94 Mo. App. 307 , 68 S. W. 85 .] … [Mead v. Arnold, 131 Mo. App. 214, 222 , 110 S. W. 656 ; but this case does not stand upon that proposition.]