Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,550 results
0.68s
143 Me. 305 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 22, 1948
State v. Jones, 137 Me. 137 ; 16 A. (2nd) 103; Benner v. Benner, 120 Me. 468 ; 115 A. 202 . … Brown, 142 Me. 106 ; 45 Atl. (2nd) 442, 445; nor is there a direct or indirect expression of opinion as prohibited by R. S. 1944, Chap. 100, Sec. 105.
Cited 11 timesPublished661 A.2d 1141 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 19, 1995
See State v. Placzek, 380 A.2d 1010, 1013 (Me.1977). … Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Bodwell Granite Co., 102 Me. 148, 152 , 66 A. 314, 316 (1906). Recognizing this danger, we ruled in Plac-zek that the standard imposed by Hand v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedSouth Portland Shipyard & Marine Railway Corp. v. City of South Portland
581 A.2d 414 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 17, 1990
(“the Shipyard”) appeals from the dismissal in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Perkins, J.) of its M.R.Civ.P. 80B appeal of a decision of the South Portland Board of Appeals. … Kirkpatrick v. City of Bangor, 517 A.2d 320 (Me.1986); Haskell v. Phinney, 460 A.2d 1354 (Me.1983).
Cited 0 timesPublished79 Me. 78 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 5, 1887
S., wherein it is provided that " in the election of any city officers by ballot in the board of aldermen, or in convention of the aldermen and common council, in which the mayor has a right to give a casting vote, if two … Elsemore v. Longfellow, 76 Maine, 130.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPatrons Oxford Mutual Insurance v. Marois
573 A.2d 16 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 2, 1990
The Maroises, however, pursued their appeal to the Board of Environmental Protection. The Board ordered the Maroises to give Lathe Fuel access to their premises so that Lathe Fuel could comply with the consent order. … Accord, Boeing Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 113 Wash.2d 869 , 872 n. 1, 784 P.2d 507 , 510 n. 1 (1990); Broadwell Realty Services, Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas.
Cited 69 timesPublished519 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 12, 2007
Brown v. Warden, Great Meadow Coit. … See Brown, 682 F.2d at 352 .
Cited 2 timesPublished100 Me. 30 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 1905
The first objection raised by the defendants is settled in favor of the petitioners in Reynolds v. Waterville, 92 Maine, 292. … The order was then returned to the board of aldermen who insisted upon their former action and asked for a committee of conference.
Cited 11 timesPublished191 A.3d 356 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 9, 2018
See State v. … I, § 7 ; State v.
Cited 4 timesPublished669 A.2d 760 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 17, 1996
In McKellar v. … Li v. C.N. Brown, 645 A.2d 606, 609 (Me.1994). Plaintiff has failed to show that the DiConzos have a second status that constitutes a separate legal entity.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFowler v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
80 Me. 381 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 6, 1888
Bartlett v. W. U. Tel. Co. 62 Maine, 220-1; Ayer v. Same, 79 Maine, 493; Ellis v. Am. Tel. … St. 298 ; Graham v. W. U. Tel. Co. 1 Colo. 230 ; Sweetland v. Ill. &c. Tel. Co. 27 Iowa, 433 ; W. U. Tel. Co. v. Carew, 15 Mich. 525 ; W. U. Tel. Co. v. Neill, 57 Texas, 283 ; Wash. & N. O. Tel. Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublished270 A.2d 861 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 6, 1970
Dubinsky Brothers, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Missouri, 373 S.W.2d 9, 12 (Mo.1963), see also Pierro v. Pierro, 434 Pa. 131 , 252 A.2d 652, 653 (1969); Tyler v. … Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Woodbridge et al., 145 Conn. 655 , 145 A.2d 832 , 835 (1958); Howard Savings Institution of Newark, New Jersey v. Peep et al., 34 N.J. 494 , 170 A.2d 39, 41 (1961); Riley v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedInhabitants of Bremen v. Inhabitants of Brewer
54 Me. 528 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1867
or plantation, of any soldier, sailor or marine, who may be actually engaged in the military or naval service of the United States or of this State, in any recognized company, battalion or regiment of this State, or on board … In Veazie v. China, 50 Maine, 518, and in Milford v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGlynn v. City of South Portland
640 A.2d 1065 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 1994
Ford New Holland, Inc. v. Thompson Machine, Inc., 617 A.2d 540, 541 (Me. 1992). … See District Attorney v.
Cited 41 timesPublishedDoughty v. Work Opportunities Unlimited/Leddy Group
33 A.3d 410 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 13, 2011
West v. C.A.M. Logging, 670 A.2d 934, 937 (Me.1996) (quotation marks omitted); see also Timberlake v. … See Laskey v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedS. D. Warren Co. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Gorham
138 Me. 294 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 10, 1942
Carrigan v. Stillwell, 99 Me., 434, 437, 59 A., 683, 684 , 68 L. R. A., 386; Chase, Adm. v. Town of Litchfield, 134 Me., 122, on page 128, 182 A., 921 . … Rackliff v. Greenbush, 93 Me., 99, on page 104, 44 A., 375, 376 ; Belfast v. Bath, 137 Me., 91, on page 94, 15 A., 2d, 249.
Cited 5 timesPublished144 Me. 36 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 7, 1949
He put his tools on the right running board, and tilted the cushion upwards toward the rear of the car. … Haskell v. Herbert, 142 Me. 133 ; 48 A. (2nd) 637; Howe v. Houde, 137 Me. 119 ; 15 A. (2nd) 740. The case of Hatch v. Globe Laundry, 132 Me. 379 ; 171 A. 387 , is called to our attention by the plaintiffs.
Cited 5 timesPublished310 F. Supp. 3d 969 · District Court, D. Maine · May 7, 2018
Motors Corp. v. Harry Brown's, LLC , 563 F.3d 312 , 319 (8th Cir. 2009). … According to Doe, the Board had only one question for him. (Compl. ¶ 85.)
Cited 7 timesPublished146 Me. 455 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 4, 1950
In McPheters v. … Great Northern Manufacturing Co. v. Brown, 113, Me. 51, 53, 92 A. 993 . Fraud vitiates all contracts into which it enters, verbal or written. Warren v. Kimball, 59 Me. 264, 266 ; Stewart v.
Cited 7 timesPublished156 Me. 363 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 20, 1960
Spofford, in his capacity as Chairman of the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Waldoboro, and as a member thereof.) All well pleaded allegations of the plaintiff we must treat as true because of the demurrer. Inman v. … In Soule v.
Cited 1 timesPublished916 A.2d 941 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 2007
Corp. v. Pilecki, 2006 ME 84, ¶ 13 , 901 A.2d 189, 195 (discussing individual responsibility of corporate officers); Page v. … See Patane v. Brown, 2002 ME 47, ¶ 10 , 792 A.2d 1086, 1089 . 3 [¶ 12] Based on the evidence, the District Court could find that Cates was intimidated and made fearful by Donahue’s agents’ actions.
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna