Case law

Yazzie v. National Organization for Women

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2024

See Forkkio, 306 F.3d at 1130–31 (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 457). The en banc D.C. Circuit, however, overruled Brown in Chambers v. District of Columbia, 35 F.4th 870 (D.C. … Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014).

Powell v. Castaneda

247 F.R.D. 179 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2007

Corp. v. … Compare Walker v.

McCrea v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2021

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.

Kenneth B. Crawford v. Robert E. McLaughlin Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia

286 F.2d 821 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1960

Upon the basis of an administrative record consisting of the proceedings before the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board and before the appellees as the Board of Commissioners, the District Court granted the appellees … See Bradley v. City of Los Angeles, 1942, 55 Cal.App.2d 592 , 131 P.2d 391 .

Gold Bond Building Products, a Div. Of National Gypsum Company v. National Labor Relations Board

901 F.2d 1130 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1990

(BNA) 2431 , 284 U.S.App.D.C. 78 Gold Bond Building Products, a Div. of National Gypsum Company v. National Labor Relations Board NO. 89-1425 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 2025

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2022). A “complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

Moore v. Summers

113 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 2000

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455 (D.C.Cir.1999). However, in addressing whether lateral transfers are cognizable as adverse employment actions. … See Yerdon v.

Niskey v. Nielsen

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 2019

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). A motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) “tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint.” Browning v. … Fausto, 484 U.S. 439, 455 (1988)) (holding CRSA provides the exclusive avenue for federal employee to challenge adverse personnel actions); Brown v. Gen. Servs.

IN RE JUAN LORENZO RODRIGUEZ-QUESADA

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 2015

Similarly, the Board must defer to the factual findings of the Hearing Committee if those findings are supported by substantial evidence. See, e.g., In re Brown, 112 A.3d 913, 917 (D.C. 2015) (per curiam). … In re Kline, 11 A.3d 261, 265 (D.C. 2011) (court in disciplinary proceeding did not consider argument that was not briefed and was only raised during oral argument); Bardoff v.

United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 152 v. National Labor Relations Board

768 F.2d 1463 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 26, 1985

IUEW v. NLRB, supra, 604 F.2d at 695; NLRB v. Band-Age, Inc., supra, 534 F.2d at 5 . … Our careful review of the record leads us to uphold the decision of the Board. The Board is entitled, in making such findings, to consider evidence that is either direct or circumstantial, NLRB v.

International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots of America, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

351 F.2d 771 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 1965

In Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. … . v.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

394 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1968

The Board made similar findings. … The Board also found that the economic strike which began in November, 1964, was never converted into an unfair labor practice strike, because the Company engaged in no conduct violative of the Act. . NLRB v.

Okereh v. Winter

600 F. Supp. 2d 139 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2009

Okereh filed an employment-discrimination complaint with the Merit Systems Protection Board (the Board) claiming he was fired based on his race, national origin, and color. (Id. at ¶ 3.) … Washington v.

Local 153, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Marie Phillips, Inc., Marie Phillips, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

443 F.2d 667 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1971

P 11,261 LOCAL 153, INTERNATIONAL LADIES' GARMENT WORKERS' UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MARIE PHILLIPS, INC., Respondent. … Stevens & Co. v. N.L.R.B., 417 F.2d 533 (5th Cir. 1969), which demonstrates what the Board considers to be an appropriate case for such relief.

Orange Belt District Council of Painters No. 48 v. National Labor Relations Board

365 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 14, 1966

See Meat and Highway Drivers, Dockmen, etc. v. N.L.R.B., 118 U.S.App.D.C. 287, 295-296 , 335 F.2d 709 , 717-718 (1964); Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413, etc. v. … Compare District No. 9, International Ass’n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 114 U.S.App.D.C. 287, 290 , 315 F.2d 33, 36 (1962).

Longus v. United States

52 A.3d 836 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2012

See O’Brien v. … See also Gatlin v.

Doctors Council of the District of Columbia General Hospital v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

914 A.2d 682 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 2007

Dais during his testimony revealed that the PBC Board “was established in December of 1996, when it had its first board meeting.” 3 At a PBC Board meeting, which *688 Dr. … Co. v.

Chicago Local No. 458-3M, Graphic Communications International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

206 F.3d 22 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 2000

In order for the court properly to review the Board's decision, it "must be able to discern the rationale" underlying the Board's conclusions. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Int'l Union v. NLRB, 46 F.3d 82, 90 (D.C. … In order to make NLRB v.

Howard Univ. Hosp. v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs.

200 A.3d 1244 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2019

Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 83 A.3d 739, 743 n.6 (D.C. 2014). … Code § 32–1508 (3)(V).” Brown, 83 A.3d at 743 n.6. In the present case, Mr. Lyles sought a schedule award under D.C. Code § 32- 1508 (3)(A) and (S), which govern the partial loss of use of an arm.

International Ass'n of Machinists, Local Lodge No. 311 v. National Labor Relations Board

289 F.2d 451 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 1961

And see United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 1960, 362 U.S. 329 , 80 S.Ct. 759 , 4 L.Ed.2d 768 . . Board’s brief. . Penn Oil Co. v. … United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 1960, 362 U.S. 329 , 80 S.Ct. 759 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 768 , reversing N. L. R. B. v.