Case law

Crosier v. Brown

66 W. Va. 273 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1909

Coalter v. Hunter, 4 Rand. 58 ; Stokes &c. v. Upper Appomatox Co., 3 Leigh 318 ; Walton v. Knight, 62 W. Va. 223 . … They adjusted another matter, and Crosier paid one Williams four dollars for Brown upon an agreement that he might pass over the land. He resumed doing so until 1907. This oral consent could not give title. Pifer v.

Barry Clifford v. M/v Islander, Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority, Barry Clifford v. M/v Islander

846 F.2d 111 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · May 13, 1988

M/V Islander. … Alkmeon Naviera, S.A. v. *114 M/V “Marina L, ” 633 F.2d 789 , 798 (9th Cir.1980); Earnhardt v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 744 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1984). As the court noted in Western Pacific Fisheries, Inc. v.

Opdenwyer v. Brown

155 La. 617 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 28, 1924

Brown, (3) That the boundary line between the properties of petitioner and said O. W. Brown has not been (correctly?) established and marked and located by and between petitioner and said Brown. … In Buisson v.

Brown v. . Richardson

20 N.Y. 472 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1859

Brown was to be regarded as the assignor of a thing in action and not as the mere indorser of a promissory note. Bichardson therefore, at the time he was offered, was no doubt a competent witness. … Brown was not to be regarded as the assignor of a thing in action within the meaning of the Code.

People v. Brown

417 P.3d 868 · Colorado Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 2016

Brown on the issue. See People v. … Brown’s inability to lawfully drive the car does not alone make the impoundment reasonable. See Taylor v.

Brown v. Kellogg

17 Wis. 475 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1863

Kellogg sued Brown, and on. tbe return day of tbe summons, wbicb was tbe 26tb of November, 1862; the parties appeared-, and; after issue joined, Brown applied for an adjournment for three months, to procure tbe testimony … Brown did not appear. It is obvious from this recital of facts, that tbe case of Roberts v. Warren, 3 Wis., 736 , is decisive of the action. Tbe statute is tbe same now as when that case arose. R. S., ch. 120, sec. 11.

Brown v. Mortensen

242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 67 · California Court of Appeal, 5th District · Jan 3, 2019

(See Brown v. Mortensen (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1052 , 126 Cal.Rptr.3d 428 , 253 P.3d 522 .) … The Browns contend that our Supreme Court, in Shaw v.

People v. Brown

45 N.Y.2d 852 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1978

(See, e.g., People v Droz, 39 NY2d 457, 462 , and cases cited; People v Bennett, 29 NY2d 462, 465-467 .) Generally, the ineffectiveness of counsel is not demonstrable on the main record, but in this case it is. … People v Brown, 28 NY2d 282, 286-287 ). Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum. Order reversed, etc.

Wormser v. . Brown

149 N.Y. 163 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1896

(Jerome v. R oss, 7 Johns. Ch. 315 ; T. & B. R. R. Co. v. B., H. T. & W. Ry. Co., 86 N. Y. 107, 123 ; Shepard v. M. R. Co., 131 N. Y. 215 ; Doyle v. M. E. R. Co., 136 N. Y. 505, 511 ; Bookman v. N. Y. … (McHenry v. Jewett, 90 N. Y. 58 ; Health Department v. Purdon , 99 id. 237 ; Jeffers v. Jeffers, 107 id. 650; Genet v. D. & H. C. Co., 122 id. 505 ; Thomas v. M. Mutual Protective Union, 121 id. 45; MacLaury v.

Kim Brown v. Carlton Brown

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 14, 2005

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 11, 2005 Session KIM BROWN v. … Lancaster v. Lancaster, 671 S.W.2d 501, 503 (Tenn. Ct. App.1984); Goodman v. Goodman, 8 S.W.3d 289, 295 (Tenn. Ct. App.1999).

State v. Brown

2017 Ohio 7704 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 2017

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2017-Ohio-7704.] … State v.

Brown v. Ricketts

3 Johns. Ch. 553 · New York Court of Chancery · Nov 9, 1818

In Haycock v. Haycock, (2 Chan. … Chancey v. May, Prec. in Chan. 592. Good v. Blewitt, 13 Vesey, 399.) In Wiser v. Blachly, ( 1 Johns. Ch.

Hard v. Brown

18 Vt. 87 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Jan 15, 1846

Hard went to take possession of the premises, without having any furniture appraised, and Brown made no claim, that the security was to include the use of furniture. … If it commenced on either day, Hard had the whole of the first day, in which he could give to Brown the security.

Brown v. State

9 Okla. Crim. 382 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 19, 1913

“The State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff v. A. P. Brown, Nettie V. Brown, Cora Brumfield, Bert Brumfield, Defendants. “Comes now L. F. … In Holcomb v.

Brown v. State

160 Tex. Crim. 150 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 3, 1954

It has been the rule in this court since Vyvial v. State, 115 Texas Cr. … See also Vowell v. State, 156 Texas Cr. Rep. 492 , 244 S.W. 2d 214 ; Allala v. State, 157 Texas Cr. Rep. 458 , 250 S.W. 2d 207 ; and Hicks v. State, 158 Texas Cr. Rep. 45 , 251 S.W. 2d 409 .

Brown v. Commonwealth

87 Va. 215 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Dec 11, 1890

the judge of the county court of Franklin county, residing remote from the place where the offence is charged to have been committed, and qualified in other respects, to serve as jurors on the trial of the said William Brown

Brown v. Ventura

145 N.Y.S.3d 439 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 11, 2021

Brown v Ventura ( 2021 NY Slip Op 03753 ) Brown v Ventura 2021 NY Slip Op 03753 Decided on June 11, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … BROWN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v ANNE T. VENTURA AND GARY M. VENTURA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. MICHAEL J. ROULAN, GENEVA, FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. REFERMAT HURWITZ & DANIEL PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN T.

State v. Brown

121 Idaho 385 · Idaho Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1992

Sivak v. State, 112 Idaho 197, 214 , 731 P.2d 192, 209 (1987). In State v. … State v. Olin, 103 Idaho 391, 395 , 648 P.2d 203, 207 (1982). Applying the analysis of State v.

Brown v. . Clark

77 N.Y. 369 · New York Court of Appeals · May 20, 1879

(Ackerly v. Vernon, 1 Comyn, 381; Barnes v. Crowe, 1 Ves. Ch., 486; Mooers v. White, 6 John. Ch., 375; Van Cortlandt v. Kip, 1 Hill, 590 ; S. C., 7 id., 346.) In Van Cortlandt v. … I will cite a few of them : (Habergham v. Vincent, 2 Ves. 228; Smart v. Prujean, 6 id., 565; Williams v. Evans, 1 Cromp. & Mee., 42; Allen v. Maddock, 11 Moore’s P. C. C., 427; Burton v. Newbury, 1 L. R. Ch.

People v. Brown

133 A.D.3d 772 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 18, 2015

Manini, 79 NY2d 561, 573 [1992], quoting Penal Law § 10.00 [8]; see People v Arnold, 60 AD3d 960 [2009]; People v Tirado, 47 AD2d 193 [1975]). … Huertas, 32 AD3d 795 [2006]; People v Gautreaux-Perez, 31 AD3d 1209 [2006]; People v Swain, 241 AD2d 695, 696 [1997]; see also People v Manini, 79 NY2d at 572-573 ; People v Pearson, 75 NY2d 1001, 1002 [1990]).