Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.67s
17 Or. App. 104 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 1, 1974
This court may reverse or remand the Board’s order only if it finds that “* * * the order is not supported by reliable, *108 probative and substantial evidence in the whole record * * ORS 183.480 (7) (d); Harvey v. … In Zimbrick v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMuncy v. State Accident Insurance Fund
19 Or. App. 783 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 16, 1974
Shupe v. Compensation Department, 248 Or 129 , 432 P2d 793 (1967). See, Giese v. Safeway Stores, 10 Or App 452 , 499 P2d 1364 , 501 P2d 982 , Sup Ct review denied (1972); Pettit v. Austin Logging Co., supra. … Board.
Cited 3 timesPublished193 Or. App. 304 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 5, 2004
.”); Weyerhaeuser v. … .”); State v.
Cited 12 timesPublished55 Or. App. 688 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1982
McGarry v. SAIF, 24 Or App 883, 888 , 547 P2d 654 (1976). Employer does not contest the Board’s finding that claimant’s injury is compensable. … Claimant prevailed on a previously disallowed claim at the Board level, and the *693 Board was without authority to reduce the award of attorney fees on its own motion. See Moe v.
Cited 14 timesPublished188 Or. App. 438 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 2, 2003
As we explained in O’Neal v. … Our decision in Jeld-Wen, Inc. v.
Cited 12 timesPublished131 Or. 597 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1929
Corporations are also ordi *602 narily controlled by a board of directors elected by the stockholders. … Brown, J., absent.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLaing v. School District No. 10
190 Or. 358 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1950
In State ex rel. v. … See Stoddard v. King County, 22 Wash. 2d 868 , 158 P. 2d 78 ; Green v. Okanogan County, 60 Wash. 309 , 111 P. 226 , 114 P. 457 ; and Northwestern Improvement Co. v. McNeil, 100 Wash. 22 , 170 P. 338 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedBeaver v. Mill Resort & Casino
180 Or. App. 324 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 27, 2002
Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hayes, 325 Or 592, 596 , 943 P2d 197 (1997); Krushwitz v. McDonald’s Restaurants, 323 Or 520, 525-26 , 919 P2d 465 (1996); Norpac Foods, Inc. v. Gilmore, 318 Or 363, 366 , 867 P2d 1373 (1994). … Kiewit Pacific v. Ennis, 119 Or App 123, 126 , 849 P2d 541 (1993).
Cited 1 timesPublished258 Or. App. 227 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 21, 2013
ORS 183.482(8)(a)(B); Baker v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., 257 Or App 205, 210 , 305 P3d 139 (2013). In resolving that issue, we apply, of course, the methodology prescribed in PGE v. … Haskins v. Palmateer, 186 Or App 159, 166 , 63 P3d 31 , rev den, 335 Or 510 (2003).
Cited 1 timesPublishedVigor Industrial, LLC v. Ayres
257 Or. App. 795 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 7, 2013
See Hopkins v. … See State v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAIG Claim Services Inc. v. Cole
205 Or. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2006
Citing Counts v. … In Counts , we cited our opinion in Brooks v. *175 D & R Timber, 55 Or App 688, 692 , 639 P2d 700 (1982), for the rule that “if diagnostic services are necessary to determine the cause or extent of a compensable injury, the
Cited 2 timesPublished124 Or. App. 183 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 20, 1993
Shoulders v. SAIF, 300 Or 606, 611 , 716 *186 P2d 751 (1986); O’Neal v. Tewell, 119 Or App 329 , 850 P2d 1144 (1993). Here, the compensability of claimant’s injury was never disputed. … The Board appears to believe that it does. We disagree. The legislature added the emphasized language to the statute in 1991, in response to our original decision in Jones v.
Reversed on other grounds by Saif Corp. v. Allen, 320 Or. 192 (1994)Cited 7 timesPublished96 Or. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1989
He argues that it exceeds the court’s authority in the light of State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). See also State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221 , 744 P2d 231 (1987). … The evidentiary holdings oí Brown and Lyon are irrelevant.
Cited 3 timesPublished44 Or. 78 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1903
Bank v. Jordan, 16 Or. 113 ( 17 Pac. 621 ); Oregon & C. R. Co. v. Lane County, 23 Or. 386 ( 31 Pac. 964 ); Ramp v. Marion County, 24 Or. 461 ( 33 Pac. 681 ); Dayton v. … Board of Equaliz. 33 Or. 131 ( 50 Pac. 1009 ); Kirkwood v. Ford, 34 Or. 552 ( 56 Pac. 411 ); Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos County, 39 Or. 185 ( 64 Pac. 646 ). 2.
Cited 21 timesPublishedRehfeld v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services
283 Or. App. 288 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 2017
Baker v. Liberty Northwest Ins. … Claimant bases her contention on United Airlines v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedVan Koten v. State Industrial Accident Commission
110 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1924
This excerpt is cited with approval in Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598, 608 ( 101 Pac. 671 ). In Farrin v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 104 Or. 452 *580 ( 205 Pac. 984 ), Mr. … Justice Brown considered the identical question under consideration in the instant case quoted, with approval, the above excerpt from Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598 ( 101 Pac. 671 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished93 Or. App. 659 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 2, 1988
In Teel v. … In fact, we have read the present statute to encompass cross-appeals to the Board, although it is not clear that it expressly includes them. Travis v. Liberty Mutual Ins., supra.
Cited 3 timesPublished290 Or. 689 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1981
McBride v. Magnuson, 282 Or 433 , 578 P2d 1259 (1978). As held, however, in Brown v. … In Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.
Cited 18 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Galloway v. Watson
167 Or. 403 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1941
A.; Columbia River-Longview Bridge Co. v. Wellington, et al., 140 Or. 413 , 13 P. 2d 1075 ; People v. Pitcher, 61 Colo. 149 , 156 P. 812 , Ann. Cas. 1918D, 1185; Peninsular Power Co. v. … W. 371 ; Arkansas Tax Com. v. Turley, 185 Ark. 31 , 45 S. W. 2d 859 ; State v. Local Board, 225 Iowa 855 , 283 N. W. 87 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedBeneficiaries of the Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum Motorwerks, Inc.
325 Or. 439 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1997
See Boise Cascade Corp. v. … Because the Board’s finding to that effect was based on substantial evidence in the record, that finding is binding on this court on review. ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(7) & (8); Garcia v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna