Case law

Champlin v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

163 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1933

This court passed squarely upon the question of the finality of an assessment made by the Oklahoma State Board of Equalization, in the case of Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Cruce, Gov., 45 Okla. 774 , 147 P. 152 . … Hopkins v. Tobacco Co., 140 Mo. 218 , Loc. Cit. 223, 41 S. W. *190 776; State ex rel. Hayes v. Seahorn, 139 Mo. 582 , Loc. Cit. 59, 610, 39 S. W. 809 ; State ex rel. Wenneker v. Cummings, 151 Mo. 49 , Loc.

Shelton v. State Ex Rel. Caldwell, Co.

62 Okla. 105 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 2, 1917

Board of Commissioners of Grant Co. v Ernest, 45 Okla. 725 , 147 Pac. 322 ; Anderson v. Board of Commissioners, Grant County, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 : Russell v. … Board of Com’rs of Grant County, 44 Okla. 301 , 144 Pac. 580 ; Huntington v Board of Com’rs of Grant County, 44 Okla. 276 , 144 Pac. 385 ; Orendorff v.

PARKS v. STATE ex rel PARDON AND PAROLE BD.

417 P.3d 1232 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 2017

PARKS v. STATE ex rel PARDON AND PAROLE BD. … See Shabazz v.

Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.

184 P.3d 518 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 2008

Supp.2006 § 759 creates the Board of Tests for Alcohol and Drug Influence and authorizes the Board to set rules. … Bank of Tulsa v. Board of Comm'rs of Craig County, 1939 OK 320, ¶ 0 , 95 P.2d 878 [all per *527 sons are presumed to know the law]; Town of Red Fork v.

First State Bank & Trust Co. of Shawnee v. Wholesale Enterprises, Inc.

65 O.B.A.J. 3393 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1994

Cf., Hayes Leasing Systems, Inc. v. … Crook Motor Co. v. Goolsby, 703 F.Supp. 511, 520 (N.D.Miss.1988); citing Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 493 S.W.2d 385 (Mo.Ct.App.1973); Hertz Corp. v.

Association of Classroom Teachers of Oklahoma City, Inc. v. Independent School District 89

540 P.2d 1171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1975

Lafayette School Board v. State, 175 Ind. 147 , 93 N.E. 851 ; Titus, Petitioner, v. Lawndale School Bd. Dist., et al., Respondents, 157 Cal.App.2d 822 , 322 P.2d 56 (1958). … Board of Education of City of Tulsa v. Morley, et al., 168 Okl. 259 , 34 P.2d 258 (1934).

Bonnett v. State Ex Rel. Newer

47 Okla. 503 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1915

Zeigler, County Clerk, 26 Okla. 826 , 110 Pac. 1052 ; Parker et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, 41 Okla. 723 , 139 Pac. 981 . In Reynolds et al. v. … In support of this section of the syllabus the court cites Stookey v. Board, 6 Idaho, 542 , 57 Pac. 312 .

Independent School District No. 1 v. Logan

789 P.2d 636 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1989

Vester v. Bd. of Review of Ok. Employment Security Commission, 697 P.2d 533, 537 (Okl.1985); Tynes v. Uniroyal Tire Co., 679 P.2d 1310, 1312 (Okl.App.1984). … See also, National Gypsum Co. v. State Employment Security Bd., 244 Kan. 678 , 772 P.2d 786 (1989); Glide Lumber Products Co. v. Employment Division, 86 Or.App. 669 , 741 P.2d 907 (1987); Blake v.

Nixon v. Roberts

420 P.2d 898 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1966

In Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief & Pension Fund v. … See also Allen v. Board of Com’rs of Logan County, 131 Okl. 41 , 267 P. 860 , and Joachim v. Board of Education of Walters, 207 Okl. 248 , 249 P.2d 129 . And in Board of Education of Town of Owasso v.

Nitsche v. State Security Bank of Zanesville, Ohio

69 Okla. 37 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1918

Owen v. Tulsa, 27 Okla. 264 , 111 Pac. 320 ; Lackey v. State, supra [ 29 Okla. 255 , 116 Pac. 913 ]; Mitchell v. Carter, 31 Okla. 592 , 122 Pac. 691 ; Okla. Ry. Co. v. … Power & Light Co. v. State, 79 Md. 63 , 28 Atl. 768 ; Church v. New Orleans, 107 La. 611 . 32 South, 101 ; Brown v. Central Bermudez Co., 162 Ind. 452 , 69 N. E. 150 ; Pittsburg, C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v.

Lenard v. State

61 O.B.A.J. 2212 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 13, 1990

In support of his argument, he cites our opinion in Brown v. … The concerns expressed in Brown with regard to the science of hair comparisons and the uncertainties of the present technology are not valid in the present case. In Plunkett v.

Arkansas Valley State Bank v. Phillips

171 P.3d 899 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 2007

Brown Sprinkler Serv. … In Board of Ed. of City of New York v.

Union School District No. 1. v. Foster Lbr. Co.

142 Okla. 260 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1930

Dec. 499 ; Shawnee County v. Carter, 2 Kan. 115 ; Stevens v. Hicks. 156 N. C. 239 ; 72 S. E. 313 ; 12 C. J. 815. … The latest expression is Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. Robinson, 140 Okla. 142 , 282 Pac. 299 . Plaintiff in error cites the case of Gentis et al. v.

Gambill v. Rohrer

198 Okla. 136 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1947

See Hancock v. Maurer 103 Okla. 196 , 229 P. 611 ; 35 C. J. §370; 32 Am. Jur. §75. See, also, Gibson v. Johnson, Adm’r, 180 Okla. 417 , 69 P. 2d 329 , and Tolleson v. … Hancock v. Maurer, supra. Other argument is offered by defendants for reversal of the judgment, but in view of our holding herein it is unnecessary to consider same.

Oklahoma Tire & Supply Company v. Summerlin

290 P.2d 403 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1955

Mobley v. Brown, 151 Okl. 167 , 2 P.2d 1034 , 83 A.L.R. 1014 ; Veazey Drug Co. v. Bruza, 169 Okl. 418 , 37 P.2d 294 ; Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. … McHan, 162 Okl. 8 , 18 P.2d 875 ; Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okl. 283 , 20 P.2d 141 ; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Baker, Okl., 286 P.2d 272 .

Cherokee County Pub. Co. v. Cherokee County

48 Okla. 722 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1915

(Beaty v. State ex rel. Lee, 35 Okla. 682 , 130 Pac. 958 , citing Rakowski v. Wagoner, 24 Okla. 282 , 103 Pac. 632; Trapp v. Wells Fargo Exp. Co., 22 Okla. 377 , 97 Pac. 1003 ; Winslow v. … (Board of County *734 Com’rs of Beaver County v. Beaver County ex rel. Spohn, 45 Okla. 526 , 146 Pac. 434 .)

Oldfield v. Donelson

565 P.2d 37 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1977

In Mills v. … See, e. g., Town of Chouteau v. Blankenship, 194 Okl. 401 , 152 P.2d 379 (1944); Lutes v.

Sims v. St. Anthony Hospital

180 Okla. 385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1937

Hardy Sanitarium v. DeHart, 164 Okla. 29 , 22 P. (2d) 379 : Stayman v. McKellop. 165 Okla. 183 , 25 P. (2d) 701 ; Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. (2d) 141 : Rose Hill Burial Park v. … In Stayman v. McKellop and Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v.

Donovan v. Hackney, Inc.

583 F. Supp. 773 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1984

In Franks v. … For example in Marshall v.

Espinosa-Hernandez v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 12, 2019

Brown v. … (quoting Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)).