Case law

Powell v. Prodev X, LLC

367 N.C. 223 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 27, 2013

Stroder v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

750 F. Supp. 2d 582 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 30, 2010

. 29 C.F.R. § 825.305 ; Miller v. … Hodgens v. General Dynamics Corp., 144 F.3d 151, 163 (1st Cir.1998); see also Krenzke v.

Holmes v. Moore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2020

SMITH, BRENDON JADEN PEAY, SHAKOYA CARRIE BROWN, and PAUL KEARNEY, SR., Plaintiffs v. TIMOTHY K. MOORE in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; PHILIP E. … Smith, Brendon Jaden Peay, Shakoya Carrie Brown, and Paul Kearney, Sr.

Dorsey v. Town of Henderson

148 N.C. 423 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1908

C., 160 ; Tate v. Greensboro, 114 N. C., 397; Brown v. Electric Company, 138 N. C., 537 ; Jones v. Henderson, 60 S. E. Rep., 894 ; Ward v. Commissioners, 146 N. C., 538 ; Small v. Edenton, 146 N. C., 527 . … Co. v. Chicago, 99 U. S., 635 ; Smith v. Corp. of Washington, 20 Howard, 135 .

Zayre-Brown v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 16, 2024

WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:22-cv-191-MOC-DCK KANAUTICA ZAYRE-BROWN … See Allard v. Gomez, 9 F. App'x 793, 785 (9th Cir. 2001); Fields v. Smith, 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011); Keohane v. Fl. Dep’t of Corr. Sec’y, 952 F.3d. 1257, 1266–67 (11th Cir. 2020)); Nosworthy v. Beard, 87 F.

Commissioners v. . Telegraph Co.

113 N.C. 214 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1893

Battle v. Mayo , 102 N.C. 413 ; Fertilizer Co. v. Reams , 105 N.C. 283 . … Cited: McLean v. Breece, post , 393; Leavell v. Tel. Co. , 116 N.C. 220 ; Caldwell v. Wilson , 121 N.C. 474 ; Pate v. R. R. , 122 N.C. 880 ; Hendon v. R. R. , 125 N.C. 128 ; Corporation Com. v. R.

BROWN v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 24, 2024

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ANGELICA ROSE BROWN, ) … Co. v. Am. Nat’l Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396, 403 (4th Cir. 1998); see also Madison River Mgmt. Co. v. Bus. Mgmt. Software Corp., 402 F.

Shore v. Edmisten

290 N.C. 628 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 1, 1976

State v. Maultsby, supra; School Directors v. Asheville (II), supra; Board of Education v. Henderson, supra; Common Council of Town of Indianapolis v. Fairchild, 1 Ind. (1 Cart.) 315 (1848); Southern Express Co. v. … Board of Education v. Henderson, supra (opinions by Furches and Faircloth); School Directors v. Asheville (I), supra.

R. R. v. . Ahoskie

192 N.C. 258 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1926

In the case of Brown v. Hillsboro , 185 N.C. 376 , it was held: "If the plaintiff desires to attack an assessment when levied against his property, the statute gives him remedy. C. S., 2714." … Anderson v. Albemarle , 182 N.C. 434 ; Tarboro v. Forbes , 185 N.C. 59 ; Long v. Rockingham , 187 N.C. 199 ; Holton v. Mocksville , 189 N.C. 144 .

Lowder v. Doby

68 N.C. App. 491 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1984

It is apparent from the wording of the order of dismissal that the trial court considered the record of proceedings in Lowder v. … In Hall v.

Carolina Equipment and Parts Company v. Anders

265 N.C. 393 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1965

Accord, Supply Co. v. Watt, 181 N.C. 432 , 107 S.E. 451 ; Aydlett v. Brown, 153 N.C. 334 , 69 S.E. 243 ; Armstrong v. Lonon, 149 N.C. 434 , 63 S.E. 101 ; Kerr v. Sanders, 122 N.C. 635 , 29 S.E. 943 . In Lipschutz v. … Board of Education v. Board of Education, 259 N.C. 280 , 130 S.E. 2d 408 ; Strong, N. C. Index, Pleadings § 4.

Murphy v. Coastal Physician Group, Inc.

139 N.C. App. 290 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2000

(Coastal) lost approximately $258.3 million in revenues according to Murphy, and Coastal’s board of directors (the board) sought Murphy’s guidance. … See Brown v. Estates Corp., 239 N.C. 595, 601 , 80 S.E.2d 645, 650-51 (1954). To prevail on its claim for negligence, Coastal must prove Murphy breached a legal duty to Coastal which proximately caused injury.

Walker v. Sloan

137 N.C. App. 387 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2000

American Express elected two representatives, Anderson and Goodwin, to serve on the Board of Directors (“the Board”) with Sloan and Beckett. … App. 132, 136 , 437 S.E.2d 692, 695 (1993) (second alteration in original) (quoting Brown v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 93 N.C. App. 431, 437 , 378 S.E.2d 232, 236 (1989).

Vance v. Hampton

256 N.C. 557 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1962

Rigsbee v. Perkins, 242 N.C. 502 , 87 S.E. 2d 926 ; Tynes v. Davis, 244 N.C. 528 , 94 S.E. 2d 496 . See Rules 19(3) and 21, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 783 , et seq. … Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1 , 95 S.E. 2d 118 . The only question raised by an exception to the judgment is whether error of law appears upon the face of the record. Lowie & Co. v.

Zayre-Brown v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 2, 2024

BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Kanautica Zayre-Brown, is a transgender woman. … Zayre-Brown. No reasonable jury could find that Defendants lacked subjective awareness that denying Ms. Zayre-Brown’s request carried some risk of harm.

Nash v. . Tarboro

227 N.C. 283 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1947

Brumley v. Baxter , 225 N.C. 691 , 36 S.E.2d 281 , 162 A.L.R., 930 ; Clayton v. Liggett Myers Tobacco Co. , 225 N.C. 563 , 35 S.E.2d 691 ; Brown v. Comrs. of Richmond County , 223 N.C. 744 , 28 S.E.2d 104 ; Kennerly v. … Glenn v. Board of Education , 210 N.C. 525 , 187 S.E. 781 ; R. R. v. Cherokee County , 177 N.C. 86 , 97 S.E. 758 ; S. v. Knight , 169 N.C. 333 , 85 S.E. 418 ; 11 Amer. Jur., 714 .

Davis v. . Commissioners of Stokes

74 N.C. 374 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

But if the board borrows money, either to support the poor or to build a church, and gives its bond, with A B as surety, then the surety is liable whether the board is or not. Apply these principles to our case. … Cited: Womble v. Comrs. , 74 N.C. 422 ; Daniel v. Comrs. , 74 N.C. 500 .

Roebuck v. . Trustees

184 N.C. 611 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 13, 1922

State Ex Rel. M. v. Prince Chairman v. McNeill

77 N.C. 398 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1877

We think these cases were well decided, and are; not in conflict with State v. Bradshaw, and are supported by Crumpler v. Governor, 1 Dev. 52 ; State v. Long, 8 Ire. 415 State v. … Brown, 11 Ire. 141, and by the well settled rules of construction both of bonds and statutes. The cases of Holt v. McLean , and Eaton v. Kelly, supra, which *404 were cited as in conflict with State v.

State v. . Pearson

100 N.C. 414 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1888

State v. Norwood, 93 N. C., 578 ; State v. Johnson, 94 N. … Wynn v. Buckett, Tay., 140, (87); Brown v. Frazier, 1 Murph., 421; Ex parte Bradley, 4 Ired., 543 ; Northam v. Terry, 8 Ired., 175; Whitley v. Gaylord, 3 Jones, 286 .