Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.13s
Yazzie v. National Organization for Women
District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2024
See Forkkio, 306 F.3d at 1130–31 (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 457). The en banc D.C. Circuit, however, overruled Brown in Chambers v. District of Columbia, 35 F.4th 870 (D.C. … Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014).
Cited 0 timesPublished21 App. D.C. 201 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1903
TIisey *205 v. Peters, 6 App. D. C. 68; Doyle v. McRoberts, 10 App. D. C. 445; Foster v. Antisdel, 14 App. D. C. 552; Bechman v. Wood, 15 App. D. C. 484; Latham, v. Armat, 17 App. D. C. 345; Austin v. Johnson, 18 App. … The distinction is well pointed out by the board of examiners-in-chief in their opinion filed in this case.
Cited 0 timesPublished56 F.3d 205 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 1995
Co. v. … Van Lines, Inc. v.
Cited 17 timesPublished707 F.2d 1559 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 1983
See GAO v. GAO Personnel Appeals Board, 698 F.2d 516, 534-36 (D.C.Cir.1983). … (General Accounting Office v. General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board, No. 81-2401.)
Cited 1 timesPublished392 F.2d 801 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 1967
B. v. S. E. … This court has consistently upheld the rule, announced by the Board in N. L. R. B. v.
Cited 33 timesPublished147 F.3d 999 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 1998
That is, the Board’s remedy must be truly remedial and not punitive. See NLRB v. Strong, 393 U.S. 357, 359 , 89 S.Ct. 541 , 21 L.Ed.2d 546 (1969); Republic Steel Corp. v. … Therefore, although a reviewing court must give special respect to the Board’s choice of remedy, NLRB v.
Cited 35 timesPublished401 F.2d 952 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 1968
Our starting point is NLRB v. … NLRB v. Salem Bldg. Trades Council, 388 F.2d 987 (9th Cir. 1968). 6 . NLRB v. Salem Bldg. Trades Council, supra note 5 , cf. NLRB v.
Cited 30 timesPublishedSingletary v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2010
v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 (1997). This is a distinct and independent means of proving municipal liability and does not require Singletary to allege the existence of an explicit policy or practice by the District. … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404; cf. City of Canton v.
Cited 0 timesPublished300 F.2d 699 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 4, 1962
Co., 286 F. 2d 424 (2d Cir. 1960) 24 O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 507-508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951) 25 93 Cong.Rec. 6677-78 (1947) (remarks of Sen. Taft). Cf. O'Leary v. … Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., supra note 23; Swift & Co. v. United States, 316 U.S. 216 , 62 S.Ct. 948 , 86 L.Ed. 1391 (1942); Allegheny Corp. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedKenneth B. Crawford v. Robert E. McLaughlin Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia
286 F.2d 821 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1960
Upon the basis of an administrative record consisting of the proceedings before the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board and before the appellees as the Board of Commissioners, the District Court granted the appellees … See Bradley v. City of Los Angeles, 1942, 55 Cal.App.2d 592 , 131 P.2d 391 .
Cited 6 timesPublished115 F.3d 1045 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 1997
Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965) (citing NLRB v. Insurance Agents’ Int’l Union, 361 U.S. 477, 498 , 80 S.Ct. 419, 432 , 4 L.Ed.2d 454 (1960)). … See Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 50 F.3d 1041, 1051 (D.C.Cir.1995), aff'd, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2116 , 135 L.Ed.2d 521 (1996).
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
77 F.2d 370 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1935
Life Insurance Company v. Bailey, 13 Wall. 616, 621 , 20 L. *372 Ed. 501 ; Buzard v. Houston, 119 U. S. 347 , 7 S. Ct. 249 , 30 L. Ed. 451 . … Kimberly v. Arms, 129 U. S. 512, 523 , 9 S. Ct. 355 , 32 L. Ed. 764 ; In re Peterson, 253 U. S. 300, 313 , 40 S. Ct. 543 , 64 L. Ed. 919 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2024
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242– 43 (D.C. Cir. 2002). III. … Browder does not allege that his board file contained errors, but that a board member was biased against him.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMelvin v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
70 F. Supp. 3d 350 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2014
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, No. 94-1119, 1996 WL 263636, at *1 (D.D.C. May 15, 1996) (quoting Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972)).
Cited 7 timesPublishedJames H. Christiansen v. National Savings and Trust Company
683 F.2d 520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 20, 1982
Davis v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, 517 F.2d 1044, 1051 , reh. denied, 521 F.2d 814 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 944 , 96 S.Ct. 1685 , 48 L.Ed.2d 188 (1976). … Defendants cite Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 213 U.S. 25 , 29 S.Ct. 404 , 53 L.Ed. 682 (1909), for the proposition that an insurance contract does not create a trust in favor of policyholders.
Cited 29 timesPublishedGold Bond Building Products, a Div. Of National Gypsum Company v. National Labor Relations Board
901 F.2d 1130 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1990
(BNA) 2431 , 284 U.S.App.D.C. 78 Gold Bond Building Products, a Div. of National Gypsum Company v. National Labor Relations Board NO. 89-1425 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Cited 11 timesPublished443 F.2d 667 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1971
P 11,261 LOCAL 153, INTERNATIONAL LADIES' GARMENT WORKERS' UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MARIE PHILLIPS, INC., Respondent. … Stevens & Co. v. N.L.R.B., 417 F.2d 533 (5th Cir. 1969), which demonstrates what the Board considers to be an appropriate case for such relief.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHoward Univ. Hosp. v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs.
200 A.3d 1244 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2019
Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 83 A.3d 739, 743 n.6 (D.C. 2014). … Code § 32–1508 (3)(V).” Brown, 83 A.3d at 743 n.6. In the present case, Mr. Lyles sought a schedule award under D.C. Code § 32- 1508 (3)(A) and (S), which govern the partial loss of use of an arm.
Cited 6 timesPublished351 F.2d 771 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 1965
In Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. … . v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedNational Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
618 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 11, 1980
United States v. CAB, 511 F.2d 1315 , 1322 (D.C.Cir.1975). … Trans Alaska Pipeline Cases, 436 U.S. 631, 643 , 98 S.Ct. 2053, 2061 , 56 L.Ed. 591 (1978), quoting Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 571 , 85 S.Ct. 1162, 1166 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna