Case law

Hughes Tool Co. v. Ford

114 F. Supp. 525 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1953

He is a very intelligent and well qualified engineer who made a most capable witness. … Clearly, a patent is in itself a limited monopoly, authorized by law, if used without abuse.

Robinson v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC.

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Aug 5, 2024

Robinson’s complaint does not clearly state the citizenship of each party, some of which are limited liability entities. … Robinson overlooks that the elements of Article ITI standing must be met even if a person qualifies as an aggrieved person under the FHA. See Bank of Am. Corp. v.

Project Drilling, LLC v. Ledya Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, SA

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 11, 2022

Project’s claims against LOG clearly arise out of LOG’s contacts with Oklahoma, and the same evidence also establishes that Project’s injury arose from LOG’s contacts with Oklahoma. … LOG also argues that potential economic loss is insufficient as a matter of law to qualify as irreparable harm.

Opinion No. (2006)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 27, 2006

The court stated: But clearly, § 156.1 indicates that government transportation to a destination (private residence) for a private purpose (to go home at the end of the work-day) does in fact fulfill a public purpose, because … We therefore conclude that to qualify as an ABLE Commission law enforcement officer for purposes of Section 156.1(B)(2), an ABLE Commission employee must maintain a current CLEET certification and be charged by the ABLE Commission

Gilson v. State

71 O.B.A.J. 2063 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 2000

Draper, the trial court found the testimony "does not meet the Dau-bert standards to qualify as expert direct testimony regarding credibility. The eredi-bility, again, is a matter for the finder of fact." … "[In the common law, intentional killing is not the only basis for establishing the most egregious form of eriminal homicide....

Wheeler v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 12, 2021

Second, plaintiff argues that the magistrate judge erred by finding that any error at step two is harmless as long as the ALJ found at least one impairment qualifies as severe. Id. at 3. … Colvin, 813 F.3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2016), the Tenth Circuit clearly states that as long as the ALJ finds one !

Tedder v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 8, 2021

Plaintiff bears the “step three burden to present evidence establishing her impairments meet or equal listed impairments[.]” Fischer-Ross v. Barnhart, 431 F.3d 729, 733 (10th Cir. 2005). … An impairment that manifests only some of those criteria, no matter how severely, does not qualify.” Sullivan, 493 U.S. at 530.

Western Southern Fire Ins. Co. v. Murphey

56 Okla. 702 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1916

We have heretofore copied the gist of the answer and the reply, which clearly shows that there was an issue joined. The answer alleges that the contract was without consideration, ultra vires, and void. … The trial court found that the facts as alleged and proved were insufficient to constitute or establish fraud, and in this respect we are of the opinion that the trial court was correct.

Feenstra v. Sigler

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 13, 2019

and therefore “[t]he state, its political subdivisions, and all of their employees acting within the scope of their employment . . . shall be immune from liability for torts.” … Thus, as recognized by the Oklahoma Supreme Court, “‘constitutional’ torts are . . . clearly ‘torts’ governed by the GTCA.” Barrios v. Haskell Cty. Pub.

Pryor v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.

170 Okla. 158 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1934

The kind or amount of evidence required to establish it is not subject to control of the several states. … Ed. 284 , where a judgment of recovery was affirmed, the court saying, in commenting on the Layton, Gotcliall, Conarty and Lang Cases, supra: “The rule clearly Reducible from these four cases is that, on the one hand, an

Shaw v. Cherokee Meadows, LP

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 30, 2019

In order to establish a prima facie case of discrimination based on handicap under the FHA, plaintiffs must prove that: (1) they are handicapped; (2) that they applied for and were qualified to rent a unit in the Community … “To make out a prima facie case for discrimination in violation of the Rehabilitation Act, [plaintiffs] must establish: ‘(1) that [she] is disabled under the Act’; (2) that [she] would be ‘otherwise qualified’ to participate

Manchester v. Neundorf

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 13, 2022

Under the undisputed facts presented to the Court, the Trustee has met that burden and qualifies as a bona fide purchaser under Oklahoma’s constructive notice law. … The Court recognizes that this is a harsh result; however, clearly established Oklahoma and bankruptcy law mandates the outcome.

Foust v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 18, 2025

Finally, in evaluating a claimant’s subjective statements, the ALJ must “provide specific reasons for the weight given to the [claimant’s] symptoms, [which are] consistent with and supported by the evidence, and [ ] clearly … Plaintiff acknowledges the ALJ’s report of Plaintiff’s ability to perform daily activities with breaks, but Plaintiff insists that this qualifier (taking breaks) fails to “meaningfully address” evidence that

Butler v. Nunn

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 16, 2022

Dkt. # 9-2, at 21-23; Dkt. # 9-4, at 1; see Clark, 468 F.3d at 714 (explaining that motions and applications filed after expiration of the limitation period do not qualify as tolling motions under § 2244(d)(2)). … In short, the instant petition, filed December 22, 2021,6 is clearly untimely under § 2244(d)(1)(A).

David v. Hodges

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Sep 11, 2025

be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief, the Court must dismiss the complaint. Id. § 1915A(b). … The Supreme Court has not established “an abstract, freestanding right to a law library or legal assistance,” so “an inmate cannot establish relevant actual injury simply by establishing that his prison’s law library or

Coddington v. State

254 P.3d 684 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 13, 2011

There is no evidence by which this Court can conclusively establish that the trial court left the courtroom in this case. … Such an assessment puts this error clearly within the category of trial error.

Wanjiku

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 8, 2026

As this Court has already stated, the existing record clearly shows Petitioner is not entitled to relief. Moreover, the videos have already been produced in full. … Likewise, a judge’s ordinary efforts at courtroom administration, even if stern and short-tempered, are “immune” from charges of bias and partiality.

BROWN v. MULDROW PUBLIC SCHOOLS

2024 OK CIV APP 20 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 2024

Although a state entity "retains its immunity with respect to formulation of policy," the state entity remains subject to liability "for routine decisions and daily implementation of the policy or planning level decisions … As established above, the statutory cap in the instant case is $125,000.00 pursuant to 51 O.S. § 154(A)(2).

Alexander v. Traill

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 25, 2021

The TCSO has established administrative procedures for inmates housed at the DLMCJC to submit requests and grievances. [Dkt. 20-1, at 4-7 (Def.’s Ex. C, Inmate Handbook)]. … immunity, and (4) Alexander is not entitled to any damages.

Bryant v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2023

At step two, the claimant must establish an impairment or combination of impairments that is severe. See Lax, 489 F.3d at 1084. … Clearly articulated so the individual and any subsequent reviewer can assess how the adjudicator evaluated the individual’s symptoms.” SSR 16-3p at *10; see also White v.