Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

2.25s

  • Phillips v. Local No. 662, Radio & Television Engineers

    192 F. Supp. 643 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 19, 1960

    The merits of the controversy rest in the Board with the right of a losing party to go into the courts. … In this respect, it would appear there is probable cause sufficient to warrant the injunction and full investigation to be made by the Board to determine the issue on its merits.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • William L. Jenkins v. Tennessee Department of Corrections

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 29, 2016

    SCOPE OF REVIEW The disciplinary board‟s action is reviewed through the common-law writ of certiorari, which provides a limited scope of review. Rhoden v. State Dep’t of Corr., 984 S.W.2d 955, 956 (Tenn. Ct. … Watts v. Civil Serv. Bd. for Columbia, 606 S.W.2d 274, 277 (Tenn. 1980); Jacks v. City of Millington Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 298 S.W.3d 163, 167 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Queener v. Magnet Mills, Ins.

    179 Tenn. 416 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1942

    We are referred to decisions of administrative boards which are said to sustain the ruling of the Board of Review herein. We are also referred to the following *424 conrt decisions: Huit v. Boyd, 64 Ga. … E. (2d), 544 ; Johnson v. Pratt et al., 200 S. C., 315, 20 S. E. (2d), 865 ; Chrysler Corporation v. Smith, 297 Mich., 438 , 298 N. W., 87 , 135 A. L. R., 900.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Phillip M. Nall v. The City of Oak Ridge.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 10, 2014

    In Tidwell v. … V, sec. 23. Therefore, the decision of the Board did not affect the “employment status” of the Sergeants.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Kinner

    701 S.W.2d 224 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 3, 1985

    The term “assault” was defined in Bass v. … State v. Williams, 638 S.W.2d 417 (Tenn.Crim.App.1982).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Kobie Turner v. City of Memphis

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 20, 2016

    Henley v. Amacher, No. M1999-02799-COA-R3-CV, 2002 WL 100402, at *6 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 28, 2002) (citing Brown v. Wal-Mart Discount Cities, 12 S.W.3d 785, 789 (Tenn. 2000); Turner v. … See Brown v. Wal-Mart Disc.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Joe Sloan

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 18, 1997

    In State v. … In Barker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Carpenter v. Cox

    61 Tenn. App. 101 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 20, 1969

    In the case of Ison v. … The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado upheld the resolutions of the Board of County Commissioners and quoted with approval from the opinion of Hayman v. Galveston, supra. In the case of Taylor et al. v. W. S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • King Construction Group, Inc. v. Highlands Residential Services

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 16, 2024

    Estate of Brown, 402 S.W.3d -4- 193, 198 (Tenn. 2013) (citing Hughes v. New Life Dev. … thereof, including all school and education boards; and any other subdivision of the state.”)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frazier v. City of Chattanooga

    151 F. Supp. 3d 830 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 23, 2015

    Welch v. Brown, 551 Fed.Appx. 804, 810 (6th Cir.2014) (quoting Energy Reserves Grp., Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 459 U.S. 400, 411-12 , 103 S.Ct. 697 , 74 L.Ed.2d 569 (1983)). … Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Continental Insurance Company

    63 Tenn. App. 48 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 26, 1971

    Co. v. … The general rule and an important exception thereto are also stated in Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Byron J. Walker

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 17, 2017

    The trial court denied relief, relying upon Brown and State v. Wooden, 478 S.W.3d 585 (Tenn. 2015), after finding that the Defendant’s sentences had expired. … Resolution of the Defendant’s appeal is controlled by the recent opinion of our supreme court in State v. Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200, 209-11 (2015).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robertson v. Town of Englewood

    174 Tenn. 92 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1939

    Ba nk of Gallatin v. Baler, 74 Tenn. (6 Lea), 273, 277. … Bank of Gallatin v. Baber, 74 Tenn. (6 Lea), 273; O’Connor v. Memphis, 74 Tenn. (6 Lea), 730; 24 R. C. L., p. 566, sec. 10; 56 Corpus Juris 271.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Elroy Gaines v. State of Tennessee

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 5, 2009

    He testified that he asked that trial counsel be removed from his case and that he made a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility. … Baxter v. Rose, 523 S.W.2d 930, 936 (Tenn. 1975). Under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Throgmorton v. Copeland

    188 Tenn. 248 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1949

    Moore v. Sharp, 98 Tenn. [491], 493, 41 S. W. 587 ; Shields v. McMahan, 112 Tenn. [1], 5, 81 S. W. 597 .” Barham v. Denison, supra. In Brown v. Howe, 163 Tenn. 138 , 40 S. … On appeal an election contest of the kind now before us is reviewed as any other case at law, Brown v. Hows, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dorrier v. Dark

    540 S.W.2d 658 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 24, 1976

    but subsequent to the passage of the Open Meetings Act. 2 This, he maintains, evinces legislative intent that local school boards be exempt from the operation of the Open Meetings Act. … The leading Tennessee case in this area is Home Insurance Co. v. Taxing District, 72 Tenn. 644 (1880). All rules of statutory interpretation have only one purpose, and that is to ascertain legislative intent. Zickler v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Henry

    65 Tenn. 539 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1873

    In the first case the prisoner had been arrested by Brown, the prosecutor, assisted by one Heal. Brown attempted to strike the prisoner with a rock, because, as was said, he was telling lies by denying his guilt. … The case of Maples v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ford Motor Company v. Pace

    206 Tenn. 559 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1960

    Board is biased and partial. … They have a board which regulates, licenses, etc., as this one does, made up of people with knowledge of their profession. This Court in Prosterman v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Engert v. Peerless Insurance Company

    53 Tenn. App. 310 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 26, 1964

    Real Estate Management v. Giles, 41 Tenn.App. 347 , 293 S.W.(2d) 596 ; Scott v. McReynolds, 36 Tenn.App. 289 , 255 S.W.(2d) 401 ; Gibbs v Trinity Universal Ins. … Co. v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Dossett v. Obion County

    188 Tenn. 538 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1949

    Garner et al. v. Scales et al., 183 Tenn. 577, 587 , 194 S. … Bank v. Western, etc., Railroad, 70 Tenn. 676 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.