Case law

Anderson v. Miller

172 Okla. 480 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1934

See, also, Guillott v. Kennedy, 101 Okla. 179 , 224 P. 540 and Grubb v. Fay State Bank, 119 Okla. 199 , 249 P. 341 . Another rule to be applied is stated in Thacker v. … Brookshire v. Burkhart, 141 Okla. 1 , 283 P. 571 ; Nale v. Herstein, 84 Okla. 35 , 202 P. 284 ; Threadgill v. Board of Education, 85 Okla. 121 , 204 P. 1100 .

Bretz v. El Reno State Bank

71 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 1918

Barton v. Saunders, 16 Ore. 51 , 16 Pac. 921 , 8 Am. St. Rep. 261 : State v. Norton, 69 S. C. 454, 48 S. E. 464 . The tax levied against these bonds is illegal because not authorized by law. … Roma Oil Co. v. Long, 68 Okla. 267 , 173 Pac. 957 , and authorities there ciled. The defendant in error paid the entire amount of the tax levied against it, and, proceeding under section 7, subd.

Van Meter v. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co.

170 Okla. 604 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1935

Board of Appeal, 257 Mass. 446 , 154 N. E. 82 : Bradley v. Board, 255 Mass. 160 and 177, 150 N. E. 892 ; Prusik v. Board of Appeal of Bldg. Dept. of Boston, 262 Mass. 451 , 160 N. E. 312 ; People ex rel. Smith v. … Board of Appeals, 115 Misc. 449 , 189 N. Y. S. 772; Norcross et al. v. Board of Appeals, 255 Mass. 177 , 150 N. E. 887 .

Reader v. Farriss

49 Okla. 459 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1915

(Caley v. Mills, 79 Kan. 418 , 100 Pac. 69 ).” In Brown v. … After citing the statute of that state permitting the filing of supplemental pleadings, *469 the court, in Halfmoon Bridge Co. v. Canal Board, 213 N. Y. 160 , 107 N.

Dorsett v. State Ex Rel. Price

144 Okla. 33 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1930

W. 315 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Isenberg, 10 Okla. 378 , 61 Pac. 1067 . Statutes must be given their reasonable construction to effectuate the end proposed. Board of County Commissioners v. … DeHasque v. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 68 Okla. 183 , 173 Pac. 73 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Alexander, 58 Okla. 128 , 159 Pac. 311 .

Acme Flour Mills v. Bray

185 Okla. 516 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1939

Brown. … Louis Mining & Smelting Co. v. State Industrial Commission, 113 Okla. 179 , 241 P. 170 ; Shepard v. Crumby, 146 Okla. 118 , 293 P. 1049 ; Magnolia Pet. Co. v. Clow, 163 Okla. 302 , 22 P.2d 378 .

Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.

13 Okla. 285 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1903

Board of Winona Co., 23 Minn. 404 ; Missouri: Hooper v. Ely, 46 Mo. 505 ; Wagner v. Mesty et al., 69 Mo. 150 ; New Hampshire: Merrill v. Plainfield, 45 N. H. 126; New Mexico: Laughlin v. … Board Santa Fe Co., 5 Pac. 817 ; Nebraska: Whitcomb v. Board of Saline Co., 24 Neb. 50 ; Ackerman v. Thummel, 40 Neb. 95 ; Tukey v. City of Omaha, 74 N. W. 613 ; Oregon: Brownfield v.

St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. Tulsa County

171 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 . … See Board of County Commissioners v. King, 147 Okla. 34 , 294 P. 101 ; Board of Education v. Thurman, 121 Okla. 108 , 247 P. 996 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Jones, 4 Okla. 341 , 51 P. 565 .

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Heinen

60 P.3d 1018 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 2002

See also, Skelton v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 56 S.W.3d 687 , 693—694 (Tex.App.—Houston, [14th Dist.] 2001), (citing Rule 3.09); Brown v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 980 S.W.2d 675, 683 (Tex.App. … —San Antonio, 1998, no pet.), (stating principle and citing Rule 3.09). .Board of Law Examiners of State of Tex. v. Gabriel, 953 S.W.2d 227, 228 (Tex.1997).

WITHDRAWAL AND REPLACEMENT OF RULE 12 OF THE RULES OF STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED COURTROOM INTERPRETERS

2017 OK 66 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 2017

Interpreters in Oklahoma; and 5) Prove that he or she holds at least one of the following sign language interpreting credentials from the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf (RID): SC:L, NIC, NIC-A, NIC-M, CI, CT, NAD V, … The renewal process shall be prescribed by the Board, and the Board shall provide a renewal form through the office of the Administrative Director of the Courts.

Garner v. Johnson

609 P.2d 760 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1980

In the case of Melody Miller v. … Perry v. Green, 468 P.2d 483 (Okl.1970).

Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. Anderson

28 Okla. 650 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

City Co. v. Smith Bridge Co., 151 U. S. 294 , 14 Sup. Ct. 339, 38 L. … Co. v. Union Steamboat Co., 107 U. S. 98 , 2 Sup. Ct. 221, 27 L.

Boyer v. State

68 Okla. Crim. 220 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1939

V. … V. Boyer, director of the Oklahoma County Welfare Board, wrote each of the requisitions, and signed the name of the secretary, Comanan Biewer; the initials R. V. B. on the requisitions under the secretary’s name.

Pierce v. State

495 P.2d 407 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1972

Miss Smith stated that she thought the eyes were brown, and when asked on examination if she would be surprised to learn that they were blue, she simply replied that she thought they were brown. … In Muller v.

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Taliaferro

176 Okla. 242 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1935

Co. v. Cameron, 85 Okla. 171 , 205 P. 161 , and Columbian National Life Ins. Co. v. Lemmons, 96 Okla. 228 , 222 P. 255 . (See, also, Brown v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co., 124 Okla. 155 , 254 P. 7 .) … To the same effect is the fifth paragraph of the syllabus in National Life Insurance Co., v. Lemmons, supra. Brown v. Missouri State Life Ins.

Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Williamson

120 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1954

As mentioned in Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 1935, 294 U. S. 608, 612 , 55 S.Ct. 570, 572 , 79 L.Ed. 1086 ; “The state court defined the policy of the statute. … See Toomer v. Witsell, 1947, 334 U.S. 385, 391 , 68 S.Ct. 1156 , 92 L.Ed. 1460 . Also, see Parker v. Brown, 1942, 317 U.S. 341, 349 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 ; Family Sec. Life Ins. Co. v.

Glen L. Wigton Motor Co. v. Phillips

163 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1933

Brown also testified as follows: “Q. … Co. v.

In Re Snodgrass

166 Okla. 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 7, 1933

Gen., v. Ledbetter, 162 Okla. 20 , 18 P. (2d) 1085 : “An application for reinstatement to the flB-ar of Oklahoma is addressed to the sound discretion of this court upon the record before it.” … Gen., v. Ledbetter, 162 Okla. 20 , 18 P. (2d) 1085 : “The application for reinstatement to the bar of Oklahoma is addressed to the sound discretion of this court upon the record before it.”

Gentis v. Hunt

121 Okla. 71 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1925

This rute has been announced by this court in the following cases: Buxton & Skinner Stationery Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Craig County, 53 Okla. 65 , 155 Pac. 215 ; State Bank of Miami v. … Co. v.

IN RE INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 403 STATE QUESTION NO. 779

367 P.3d 472 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 2016

In re Initiative Petition No. 314, 1980 OK 174, ¶ 59 , 625 P.2d 595, 603 (quoting Fugina v. … Trades Council v. Pitts, 2003 OK 113, ¶ 13 , 82 P.3d 1008, 1013 . . See Petitioners' App. A. . In re Initiative Petition No. 314, 1980 OK 174, ¶ 67 , 625 P.2d at 605 (citing Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v.