Case law

Stoddard v. Quinn

593 F. Supp. 300 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 31, 1984

Anderson, 460 U.S. at 789 , 103 S.Ct. at 1570 , 75 L.Ed.2d at 557 (quoting Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1279 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1975)). … Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265, 282 , 81 S.Ct. 534, 543 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961) (iquoting Brown v. County of Buena Vista, 5 Otto (95 U.S.) 157, 161, 24 L.Ed. 422 (1877)).

Powers v. Patten

71 Me. 583 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 31, 1880

Crocker v. Pierce, 81 Maine, 177. And the defendant also relies upon the case of Blanchard v. … Wilson v. Widenham, 51 Maine, 566; Brown v.

LeClair v. Commercial Union Insurance

679 A.2d 90 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1996

McCain Foods, Inc. v. Gervais, 657 A.2d 782, 783 (Me.1995) (citing C.N. Brown Co. v. Gillen, 569 A.2d 1206, 1209 (Me.1990)). … State v.

State v. Toppi

275 A.2d 805 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 2, 1971

See: Luck v. United States, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 151 , 348 F.2d 763 (1965) ; Brown v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 220 , 370 F.2d 242 (1966). See: Bustillos v. … Wisdom, J., writing in Green v. United States, 309 F.2d 852 (CCA 5). Brown, J., dissenting in Huffman v. United States, 297 F.2d 754 (CCA 5).

South Portland Shipyard & Marine Railway Corp. v. City of South Portland

581 A.2d 414 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 17, 1990

(“the Shipyard”) appeals from the dismissal in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Perkins, J.) of its M.R.Civ.P. 80B appeal of a decision of the South Portland Board of Appeals. … Kirkpatrick v. City of Bangor, 517 A.2d 320 (Me.1986); Haskell v. Phinney, 460 A.2d 1354 (Me.1983).

Elliott v. United States

16 F.2d 164 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 16, 1926

to sue the United States to recover back income taxes paid in 1919 for 1918, and in 1920 for 1919, upon his shares in three wooden vessels, namely V64 of the schooner Margaret Throop, of 1,800 tons dead weight capacity, V« … The Reine Marie Stewart was built to be, and was in fact, placed in service under the jurisdiction of the Shipping Board.

Chase v. Burrell

474 A.2d 180 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 13, 1984

Burrell submitted a subdivision plan to the Gouldsboro Planning Board to build on his property a community of mobile homes for the elderly. Burrell’s plan was approved, and construction began. … See Snow v. Van Dam, 291 Mass. 477 , 197 N.E. 224 (1935); Sanborn v. McLean, 233 Mich. 227 , 206 N.W. 496 (1925); see also Socec v. Maine Turnpike Authority, 152 Me. 326 , 129 A.2d 212 (1957).

Fisk v. Keene

35 Me. 349 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1853

Pells v. Brown, Cro. Jac. 590; Roe v. Jeffery, 7 T. R. 589; Doe v. Welton, 2 B. & P. 324. … Soulle v. Garrard, Cro. Eliz. 525; Dutton v. Engram, Cro. Jac. 427; Chadock v. Cowley, Cro. Jac. 695; Fitzgerald v. Leslie, 3 Bro. P. C. 154; Porter v. Bradley, 3 T. R. 143; Hawley v.

State v. Pinkham

586 A.2d 730 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 7, 1991

Given “the strong public policy against piecemeal appeals and the impossibility of this court’s serving as an advisory board to trial lawyers and judges,” State v. … State v. Ifill, 560 A.2d 1075, 1077 (Me.1989). Because Pinkham refused to take an approved test, his refusal becomes admissible without regard to the absence of a Miranda warning. State v.

State v. Underwood

49 Me. 181 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1858

In Mun v. … In Regina v.

Barnes v. Hathorn

54 Me. 124 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866

Norcross v. Thoms, 51 Maine, 503, and more fully in the case of Brown v. Perkins, 12 Gray, 97 . It is unnecessary for us to repeat them here. … State v. Haines, 30 Maine, 65; Rex v. White, 1 Burr., 337; Fish v. Dodge, 4 Denio, 311 ; State v. Pierse, 4 McCord, 472 ; Catlin v. Valentine, 9 Paige, 575 ; Rex v. Neil, 2 Carr & Payne, 485.

Spaulding v. Adams

32 Me. 211 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1850

Bradeen v. Brooks, 22 Maine, 463; Oakes v. Moore, 24 Maine, 214. … Picquet v. McKay, 2 Blackf. 465 .

In re Lac Megántic Train Derailment Litigation

210 F. Supp. 3d 218 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 28, 2016

See also Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 , 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011). 1. … Waldman v.

Rich v. Gilkey

73 Me. 595 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 28, 1881

Brunt v. Brunt, L. R. 3 Pro. and Div. 37 ; Cheese v. Lovejoy, L. R. 2 P. D. 251; Suyden v. Lord St. Leonards, L. R. 1 P. D. 154; James v. Shrimpton, L. R. 1 Pro. and D. 431; Brown v. … Brown, 8 Ell. and Bl. 876 ; Bowell v. Powell, 1 Pro. and D. (L. R.) 209. I therefore have no doubt, that a will destroyed by a person not possessing testamentary capacity, is not a revocation of such will.

Allen v. McCann

Superior Court of Maine · May 23, 2014

Brown Dev. Corp. v. Hemond, 2008 ME 146, '1[ 10, 956 A.2d 104. To avoid a summary judgment, "[t]he plaintiff must establish a prima facie case for each element of his cause of action." Steeves v. … Thus, unlike in~ the Board's decision was not premised solei y on a new work search. Similarly, in Dallaire v. Intelligent Control, Inc. and Hilligoss v.

Muratore v. M/S Scotia Prince

663 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 9, 1987

Templeman v. Chris Craft Corp., 770 F.2d 245, 247 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1021 , 106 S.Ct. 571 , 88 L.Ed.2d 556 (1985); Robinson v. Pocahontas, Inc., 477 F.2d 1048, 1053 (1st Cir.1973). 1 See also Furtado v. … Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 , 91 S.Ct. 1780 , 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971); see also State v. John W, 418 A.2d 1097, 1108 (Me.1980).

Spottiswoode v. Levine

730 A.2d 166 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 25, 1999

Section 1691b of the ECOA grants the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("Board”) the authority to "prescribe regulations to carry out the purposes of this sub-chapter." 15 U.S.C. § 1691b (1994). … Pursuant to that authority, the Board promulgated Regulation B. See 12 C.F.R. § 202.1 (a) (1999).

Finch v. Higgins

953 A.2d 1142 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 24, 2008

Liberty v. Liberty, 2001 ME 19, ¶ 11 , 769 A.2d 845, 847 ; Weiss v. Brown, 1997 ME 57, ¶ 7 , 691 A.2d 1208,1210 . [¶ 10] Moreover, Higgins’s brief to us contained a number of arguments that are totally without merit.

Marr v. Hicks

136 Me. 33 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 1, 1938

E., 712 ; Ortwein v. Droste, 191 Ky., 17 , 228 S. W., 1028 ; Oakes v. Van Zomeren, 255 Mich., 372 , 238 N. W., 177 ; Ledet v. Gottleber (La. App.), 143 So., 71 ; Davis v. … Brown, 92 Cal. *38 App., 20 , 267 P., 754 ; Barret v. Caddo Transfer & Warehouse Company, 165 La., 1075 , 116 So., 563 , 58 A. L. R., 261.

Carney v. Averill

110 Me. 172 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 27, 1912

R., Vol. 10, page 240; Baker v. … Oakes, 88 Maine, 367; Brown v. Lyford, 103 Maine, 362.