Case law

John A. Ex Rel. A.A. v. Board of Education

400 Md. 363 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 30, 2007

Clearly, the IDEA was not meant to provide a forum for the advancement of such claims. See, e.g., Hunter v. … of procedures. (1) Any state educational agency, State agency, or local educational agency that receives assistance under this subchapter shall establish and maintain procedures in accordance with this section to ensure

Degner v. Mayor of Baltimore

74 Md. 144 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 25, 1891

A lien is said to be a qualified right, which in a given case may be exercised over the property of another. Lickbarrow vs. Mason, 6 East, 20. … This case seems to us to establish the right of the State and municipality, in a case like the one we are considering, to have their taxes paid rather than eontrarywise.

Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. Maryland Department of Agriculture

211 Md. App. 417 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · May 2, 2013

Clearly, the document is related to nutrient management plans. … The number of animals that qualify [as] a facility housing poultry as a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation ("CAFO”) depends on the type of manure handling system employed.

Watson v. CSA, LTD.

376 F. Supp. 2d 588 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 23, 2005

Defendants submit that, although he was otherwise qualified, he lacked sufficient experience in power generation to be qualified for the promotion. (Id.) … Fundamentally, Combat Support Associates was directly responsible for establishing and approving CSA’s compensation and benefit plans. (Pl.’s Opp. Ex. 43.)

Denison v. Denison

35 Md. 361 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 15, 1872

It moreover provided that no person within the State should marry without first obtaining a license, to be directed to a minister or other person qualified by law to celebrate marriage in the State; or, until after banns … The appellee is objected to as an incompetent witness, and without her testimony, the evidence is insufficient to prove clearly the alleged marriage.

Bartucco v. Wright

746 F. Supp. 604 · District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 17, 1990

The class of beneficiaries in a potential wrongful death action is clearly defined and limited. … The statute was clearly designed to compensate each plaintiff individually for the loss each plaintiff suffered.

Webb v. State

144 Md. App. 729 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 10, 2002

If you want the Public Defender you’ve got to apply to them and if you qualify, they will appoint someone to represent you. … Appellant argues that the court erred in imposing his sentence because the record is devoid of evidence establishing that the State complied with Maryland Rule 4-245(c).

Floyd v. Baltimore City Police Department

District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 17, 2023

immunity. … immunity argument.

Republic of China v. National Union Fire Insurance

151 F. Supp. 211 · District Court, D. Maryland · Apr 29, 1957

The acts of the masters and mariners in the instant cases were clearly barratrous, under both British and American law. IV. … In the case of the Hai Hsuan, tests (2) and (3) are clearly met.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Roberson

373 Md. 328 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 11, 2003

This clearly constituted abandonment of a matter for which Roberson has assumed responsibility. … See also In re Allison, 267 Ga. 638, 642 , 481 S.E.2d 211, 215 (1997) (recognizing that “the primary purpose of disciplinary proceedings ... is to protect the public from attorneys who are not qualified to practice law due

Martino v. Arfaa

169 Md. App. 692 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 6, 2006

The court concluded that, even with the exhibits, “it is not clear from the *705 pleadings which of the three buildings on the property qualifies as the ‘residence’ of the [Arfaas].” … Further, the photographs attached do not clearly distinguish the residence of the Defendants from any of the other buildings on their property.

Mayor of Baltimore v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

282 Md. 431 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 23, 1978

Both defendants interposed the defense of sovereign immunity, the City by a motion to dismiss, and the State by a motion raising preliminary objection. From an order dismissing the action, the Contractor has appealed.” … The City suggests that its charter establishes what it had deemed to be adequate for its protection. Charter of Balto. City (1964), Art. VI, § 4 (g), as amended by Res.

Dones v. Donahoe

987 F. Supp. 2d 659 · District Court, D. Maryland · Dec 12, 2013

A plaintiff may establish a claim for intentional discrimination using two methods. … “The similarity between comparators ... must be clearly established in order to be meaningful.” Lightner v. City of Wilmington, 545 F.3d 260, 265 (4th Cir.2008).

Builders and Developers Corp. v. Manassas Iron & Steel Co.

208 F. Supp. 485 · District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 5, 1962

The suit is not brought pursuant to, and could not qualify under, the general diversity of citizenship jurisdiction, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 . … However, if the allegations in the answer filed by Commercial Credit Corporation can be established, plaintiff would have an independent liability to it.

Kenwood Gardens Condominiums, Inc. v. Whalen Properties, LLC

449 Md. 313 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 19, 2016

Resolution 108-11 was not the final determination that established that the Whalen Properties PUD would be built. … It was never established that Councilman Quirk was knowingly involved in any wrongdoing.

Segerman v. Jones

256 Md. 109 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 12, 1970

It is for these reasons that we think that finding No. 8 was clearly erroneous. … Whether or not a teacher is immune from suit while acting within the scope of her employment. “4.

State v. Cumberland & Pennsylvania Railroad

40 Md. 22 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 5, 1874

It was clearly stated, and which accords with the tenor of the second, third, and fourth Articles of our Bill of Rights, “that it is established that the States hold all the powers which they originally possessed, except … This is clearly manifest from the decision in the case of Egan vs.

Liverpool v. Baltimore Diamond Exchange Inc.

369 Md. 304 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 11, 2002

It is clear from a plain reading of subsection (d) that a C.O.D. transaction is established at the option of the layaway seller and by consent of the buyer. … Petitioner testified that he purchased the watch as a Christmas gift for his wife, thereby qualifying the watch as consumer goods. 9 .

Kaylor v. Wilson

260 Md. 707 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 8, 1971

Curiously enough, the documentary proof needed to establish even a paper chain of title to the property was absent. … Though unrefuted, neither of these passing references are precise or authoritative enough to qualify as even slight proof that taxes were paid during the critical years in the early ‘thirties.

Claude v. Handy

83 Md. 225 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 26, 1896

. • The appellant excepted to the report and award of the commissioners for the following reasons : 1st, because the commissioners were not legally sworn in or qualified; 2d, that the decree directed a partition of only a … But the amendment allowed was clearly within the power of the Court, and when it was represented to it that the defence and conduct of the case of the defendant would have been different had the bill as amended been originally