Case law

City of Hoboken v. State Board of Tax Appeals

14 N.J. Misc. 206 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 17, 1936

This is common practice in the case of local boards, as for example, in Lehigh Talley Railroad Co. v. Jersey City, 81 N. J. L. 290, 295; 80 Atl. Rep. 228 , and very recently in Oritani Field Club v. Hackensack, 12 N. J. … In Bayonne v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 334; 178 Atl.

Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

3 N.J. Misc. 475 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 2, 1925

Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

95 N.J.L. 295 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1921

The water company appeals from the failure of the board to alloAv its claim a-s to the other municipalities, and also appeals from the refusal to consider the case of Hoboken. … Collingswood Sewerage Co. v. Collingswood, 91 N. J. L. 20; affirmed, 92 Id. 509; Atlantic Coast Electric Railway v. Public Utility Board, 89 Id. 407; affirmed, 92 Id. 168.

BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, COUNTY OF HUDSON v. Brenner

13 N.J. 288 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 14, 1953

13 N.J. 288 (1953) BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. LOUIS P. BRENNER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 14, 1953. Mr. Daniel T. O'Regan and Mr.

State Board of Assessors v. Plainfield Water Supply Co.

67 N.J.L. 357 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1902

State Board of Registration & Examination in Dentistry v. Karas

10 N.J. Misc. 759 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1932

The defendant was complained against by the state board of registration and examination in dentistry of a violation of section 11 of the Dental act (chapter 266, laws of 1927), in that he practiced dentistry within the meaning … The state board thereupon sued out this writ of certiorari.

Hudson Transit Corp. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

15 N.J. Misc. 411 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 27, 1937

The respondent, the board of public utility commissioners of ISFew Jerse_y, having requested the return of the record in this proceeding in order that it might rescind its action heretofore taken, and no objection being made … If no action shall be taken by the board within twenty days, the record may again be forwarded to this court for the determination of the issues involved in the proceeding herein pending at this time.

Board of Education v. Fair Lawn Plaza Taxi, Inc.

32 N.J. 129 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 4, 1960

New Jersey Insurance v. State Board of Tax Appeals

119 N.J.L. 245 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 30, 1937

State Board of Tax Appeals, supra, and Commercial Casualty Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 119 Id. 94. … See Commercial Casualty Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, supra.

Butt Realty Co. v. Board of Adjustment of Plainfield

134 N.J.L. 619 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 12, 1946

Commercial Casualty Insurance v. State Board of Tax Appeals

120 N.J.L. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 29, 1938

Washburn Bros. Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

127 N.J.L. 321 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1941

In Trenton, &c., Traction Co. v. Mercer County Tax Board, 91 Id. 105, there was proof of value by the taxpayer. The case of West Orange v. Essex County Tax Board, 18 N. J. Mis. R. 383, is also not in point. … New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Newark, 118 N. J. L. 490; Tennant v. Jersey City, 122 Id. 174; affirmed, 123 Id. 200; Zoller v. State Board, &c., 124 Id. 376. The State Board of Tax Appeals followed this view.

Baldwin v. Board of Adjustment, City of East Orange

106 N.J.L. 230 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 1929

Ratajczak v. Board of Education, City of Perth Amboy

119 N.J.L. 433 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1938

City of Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals

126 N.J.L. 577 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1941

The board dismissed the appeal on the land. Thereupon, an appeal was made to the State Board of Tax Appeals as to the assessment on the land. … New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Newark, 118 N. J. L. 490; affirmed, 124 Id. 451. See, also, City of Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals et al., 126 Id. 407.

Heintze v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners

110 N.J.L. 24 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 23, 1933

North Bergen Action Group v. North Bergen Township Planning Board

122 N.J. 567 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1991

As in Commercial Realty and Resources Corp. v. … See Davis Enters, v. Karpf, 105 N.J. 476, 493 , 523 A.2d 137 (1987) (Stein, J., concurring).

Evesham Township Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Evesham Township Council

176 N.J. Super. 503 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 12, 1980

One of the ways in which the Legislature sought to encourage coordination to lessen the cost of development of land was to provide that planning boards and zoning boards of adjustment have final authority in development matters … In Mountain Hill Prop. v. Tp.

Evaul v. Board of Education of City of Camden

35 N.J. 244 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1961

Later in the evening, she sent telegrams to the Superintendent, the President of the Board, and the Board in care of the Secretary, informing them she was rescinding her resignation. … Rubenstein v. Rubenstein, 20 N. J. 359 (1956); Gobac v. Davis, 62 N. J.

Dobbins v. Board of Education of Henry Hudson Regional School

67 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 20, 1975