Case law

International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

273 F.2d 833 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 30, 1959

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 359, 365 , 262 F.2d 456, 462 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … And see National Labor Relations Board v. F. H. McGraw & Co., 206 F.2d 635, 641 (6 Cir.).

Continental Resources, Inc. v. Jewell

134 F. Supp. 3d 231 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2015

In *235 Adams Fruit Co., Inc. v. … (citing Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). Given the Court’s analysis above, the Court does not agree that equitable tolling is appropriate in this case.

General Teamsters & Allied Workers Local Union No. 992 v. National Labor Relations Board

427 F.2d 582 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1970

-C.I.O. v. NLRB, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 215 , 376 F.2d 770 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 932 (1967). The Board’s conclusion that the 14-eent wage increase was an unfair labor practice is therefore affirmed. … Int’l Union of Electrical Radio and Machine Workers v. NLRB [Tiidee Products, Inc.], 138 U.S.App.D.C. -, 426 F.2d 1243 , (April 3, 1970), quoting Bigelow v.

Dillard v. Yeldell

334 A.2d 578 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1975

Bollotin v. Workmen Service Co., 128 Cal.App.2d 339 , 275 P.2d 599 (1954); Bragassa v. Bragassa, supra note 5 ; Board of Educ. v. Fowler, supra note 5; Linden v. … Whorton v. Gaspard, supra note 6 ; State v. Groff, supra note 10 ; Keigley v. Bench, supra note 10 . 28 . Board of Pub. Util. Comm’rs v.

National Geographic Society v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

721 A.2d 618 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1998

Brown argues that this court should give deference to the agency’s reasonable interpretation of the statute it administers. See Lee v. … Co. v.

Neighbors for Responsive Government v. DC Bd. of Zoning & DC Dept. of General Services

195 A.3d 35 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 2018

(internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Oakland Condo. v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 22 A.3d 748, 752 (D.C. 2011)). 44 Brown v. … LLC v.

International Chemical Workers Union Local 483 v. National Labor Relations Board, Cabot Corporation, Intervenor

561 F.2d 253 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1977

Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473, 481 , 84 S.Ct. 894 , 11 L.Ed.2d 849 (1964). *256 We look to the terms of the contract and to the actual operations. … We find no reason to dispute the Board’s conclusion.

Matthews v. District of Columbia

924 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2013

See Bell v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 408 (1997), such as an officer’s negligence or even willingness to flout the rules in pursuit of evidence.

Waters v. Armenian Genocide Museum & Memorial, Inc.

692 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2010

Laningham v. U.S. … See Clancy v.

Smuck v. Hobson

408 F.2d 175 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1969

Undoubtedly in the day and time of it, the issuance of the decree seemed essential in light of Brown v. … The Supreme Court then had decided Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 and see Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 (1954). . Supra note 4. . 269 F.Supp. at 517 . .

Amato v. Chafee

337 F. Supp. 1214 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 1972

McCurdy v. Zuckert, 359 F.2d 491 (5th Cir., 1966) cert. denied, McCurdy v. Brown, 385 U.S. 903 , 87 S.Ct. 212 , 17 L.Ed.2d 133 ; Reed v. Franke, supra. … In Orlando v.

Keranen v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

743 A.2d 703 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 2000

Brown v. CSX Transp., Inc., 18 F.3d 245, 249 (4th Cir.1994) (quoting Robert v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 832 F.2d 3, 6 (1st Cir.1987)). … Deans, supra, 152 F.3d at 330 (citing Brown, supra, 18 F.3d at 249 ; Hurley v. Patapsco & Back Rivers R.R. Co., 888 F.2d 327, 329 (4th Cir.1989)).

Bennett v. Pettiford - U.S.P.C.

District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 2014

Maddox v. Elzie, 238 F.3d 437, 445 (D.C. Cir. 2001); see Hardy v. … Ketanji Brown Jackson Ketanji Brown Jackson United States District Judge DATE: May 12, 2014

Air Line Stewards and Stewardesses Association, International, a Labor Organizaiton v. National Mediation Board

294 F.2d 910 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 20, 1961

This case is similar in many respects to UNA Chapter, Flight Engineers’ International Association v. National Mediation Board, 1961, 111 U.S. App.D.C.-, 294 F.2d 905 . … National Mediation Board, 1943, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 . Appellant’s reliance on Leedom v.

McCrea v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2021

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.

Cody v. Cox

509 F.3d 606 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 14, 2007

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Concurring opinion filed by Chief Judge GINSBURG. … For example, in Dickson v.

William J. Hewitt v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

404 F.2d 1247 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 6, 1968

Le Vonas v. Acme Paper Board Co., supra, is not meaningful on the assumption of risk since the holding was lack of negligence. A similar explanation disposes of Morrison v. … E. g., Michael v. Stanley, 75 Md. 404 , 23 A. 1094 (1892); Maryland D. & V. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 109 Md. 304 , 71 A. 1005 (1908). . State, Use of Eckhardt v. Lazaretto Guano Co., 90 Md. 177 , 44 A. 1017 (1899); Wood v.

Edward R. Vauls v. Veterans Administration, Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States of America

693 F.2d 232 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 19, 1982

. *233 PER CURIAM: We conclude, in agreement with the decisions in Hayes v. United States Government Printing Office, 684 F.2d 137 (D.C.Cir.1982), Chang v. … Merit Systems Protection Board, 677 F.2d 173 (1st Cir.1982), Christo v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 667 F.2d 882 (10th Cir.1981), and Wiggins v.

Retail Clerks Local Union No. 381 v. National Labor Relations Board

348 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1965

B. v. … Brown et al., 85 S.Ct. 980 , the order of the Board insofar as applicable to No. 17790 is modified by deleting therefrom in paragraph 1(a) the requirement that the employers involved cease and desist from “engaging in a lock-out

12 Percent Logistics, Inc. v. Unified Carrier Registration Plan Bd.

282 F. Supp. 3d 190 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 18, 2017

set forth in Winter v. … Office for Prot. & Advocacy v.