Case law

Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. Don Whitaker Logging, Inc.

123 Or. App. 498 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

Stelljes/Dumler v. State Board of Parole, 307 Or 365 , 769 P2d 177 (1989). … The Board’s *501 powers are limited to those delegated to it by statute. U. of O. Co-Oper. v. Dept. of Rev., 273 Or 539, 550 , 542 P2d 900 (1975).

Van Koten v. State Industrial Accident Commission

110 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1924

This excerpt is cited with approval in Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598, 608 ( 101 Pac. 671 ). In Farrin v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 104 Or. 452 *580 ( 205 Pac. 984 ), Mr. … Justice Brown considered the identical question under consideration in the instant case quoted, with approval, the above excerpt from Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598 ( 101 Pac. 671 ).

Gould v. Deschutes County

322 Or. App. 340 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 2022

See Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 339 Or 136, 148-49, 117 P3d 990 (2005). 346 Gould v. … Rather, this case involved nothing more than a run-of-the-mill application of the county board of commis- sioners’ interpretation of the county’s rule in Clough. 350 Gould v.

State v. Scharf

288 Or. 451 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1980

Flores, 280 Or 273, 279 , 570 P2d 965 (1977); Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977); State v. Ivory, 278 Or 499, 503 , 564 P2d 1039 *455 (1977); State v. … Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., supra.

SAIF Corp. v. Walker

145 Or. App. 294 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1996

Perry v. SAIF, 307 Or 654 , 772 P2d 418 , aff'd on remand 99 Or App 52 (1989); Gwynn v. SAIF, 304 Or 345, 353 , 745 P2d 775 (1987). … The Board, in fact, did so. On the other hand, the text of a statute before it is amended also is considered part of its context. Krieger v. Just, 319 Or 328, 337 , 876 P2d 754 (1994).

Santos v. Caryall Transport

152 Or. App. 322 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 1998

Santos v. Caryall Transport, 138 Or App 701 , 909 P2d 903 (1996). On remand, the Board affirmed its prior decision, again citing Lebanon Plywood . … See, e.g., Atchley v. GTE Metal Erectors, 149 Or App 581, 583-85 , 945 P2d 557 , rev den 326 Or 133 (1997); Foster Wheeler Constructors, Inc. v. Parker, 148 Or App 6, 11-12 , 939 P2d 52 (1997); Vega v.

Johnson-Chandler v. The Reed Institute

320 Or. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 2, 2022

We provide some context for the board’s “good cause” determination in this case. In its order in Juan Estrada, 69 Van Natta 71 (2017), on remand from our opinion in Federal Express Corp. v. … In Estrada v.

Evans v. Finley

166 Or. 227 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1941

State Land Board v. Lee, 84 Or. 431, 441 , 165 P. 372 ; Kaiser v. Idleman, 57 Or. 224, 228 , 108 P. 193 , 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 169; Goodwin v. Morris, 9 Or. 322, 324 ; Myer v. Beal, 5 Or. 130 ; Anderson v. … Wheelock, 60 Kan. 747 , 57 P. 956 ; Knights of the Maccabees v. Louise Nitsch, 69 Neb. 372, 375 , 95 N. W. 626 , 5 Ann. Cas. 257; Snider v. Brown, (Tenn.) 48 S. W. 377 . Cf. Gilfallan v. Union Canal Co., 109 U.

Cook v. Employment Division

47 Or. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 1980

ORS 657.282; McPherson v. Employment Division, 285 Or 541, 545 , 591 P2d 1381 (1979). We are to determine whether the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record. ORS 183.482(8)(c). … See also Sun Ray Dairy v. OLCC, 16 Or App 63 , 517 P2d 289 (1973); McCann v. OLCC, 27 Or App 487 , 556 P2d 973 (1976), rev den 277 Or 99 (1977).

Standley v. State Accident Insurance Fund

8 Or. App. 429 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 1972

In Lemons v. … Defendant relies on Peterson v.

CHRISTIAN v. La Forge

194 Or. 450 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1952

To the same effect, see State Board of Barber Examiners v. Cloud, 220 Ind 552, 44 NE2d 972 ; Duncan v. City of Des Moines, 222 Iowa 218 , 268 NW 547 ; State v. Greeson et al., 174 Tenn 178, 124 SW2d 253 . … McRae v. Robbins, 151 Fla 109, 9 So2d 284; Board of Barber Examiners of Louisiana v. Parker, 190 La 214, 182 So 485; State v. McMasters, 204 Minn 438, 283 NW 767 ; Herrin et al. v.

Kasch's Garden Centers & Nurseries v. Department of Agriculture

85 Or. App. 377 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 6, 1987

See Derenco v. Benjamin Franklin Savings & Loan, 281 Or 533 , 577 P2d 477 (1978). Rule held valid. … The Secretary of Agriculture has not established a quarantine of the brown garden snail.

Vsetecka v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

183 Or. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 14, 2002

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) upholding employer’s denial of his claim on the ground that he failed to notify employer of his on-the-job injury within the time required … The board therefore correctly concluded that claimant’s entry in employer’s logbook was not sufficient to satisfy the requirements of ORS 656.265(2). Citing Argonaut Ins. Co. v.

Pfeifle v. Portland Terminal Railroad Company

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 18, 2022

Brown and the Board are not defendants in this case, work-product protection extends to documents prepared by the “other party’s representative.” … On the motion to compel production of emails from Terry Brown to the PTRC Board, ECF 56 at 7, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED because the emails are protected by the work product doctrine.

Wisherd v. Paul Koch Volkswagen, Inc.

28 Or. App. 513 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 1977

His claim for compensation was granted by the referee and the Workmen’s Compensation Board (Board), and the award was affirmed by the circuit court. … Tompkins v. Rinner Construction Co., 196 Kan 244, 409 P2d 1001 (1966); St. Paul Fire & Mar. Ins. v. Treadwell, 263 Md 430, 283 A2d 601 (1971); Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v.

Kim and Kinnersley

337 Or. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 29, 2025

See, e.g., State v. … State v.

State v. Warner Valley Stock Co.

56 Or. 283 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1910

In Pier v. … Kennedy v. Northup, 15 Ill. 148 ; Booth v. Wiley, 102 Ill. 113 ; Bunce v. Gallagher, 5 Blatchf. 481 , Fed. Cas. No. 2133; Hoopes v. Devaughn, 43 W. Va. 447 ( 27 S. E. 251 ); Carney v. Barnes, 56 W. Va. 586 ( 49 S.

Pena v. Travelers Ins. Co. (In re Pena)

294 Or. App. 740 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 2018

See Don't Waste Oregon Com. v. … See Smith v. Veterinary Medical Examining Board , 175 Or.

SAIF Corp. v. Dubose

166 Or. App. 642 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2000

See Burke v. … is requested for the reason(s) checked below: “ffl A DENIAL (Date) 2/25/97 “[X] B Compensability - complete claim denial “□ X Partial denial after a claim acceptance “□ Z Challenge to notice of acceptance ORS 656.262 “□ V

Valley & Siletz Railroad v. Laudahl

296 Or. 779 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1984

Walsh, 127 Conn 16, 16 A2d 6 , 9 (1940); Board of Adjustment of City of Fort Worth v. Stovall, 147 Tex 366, 216 SW2d 171, 173 (1949). In Matunuck Beach Hotel, Inc. v. … Zoning Board of Review, 108 RI 349, 275 A2d 646, 648-49 (1971). In Benton County v.