Case law

Hayes v. Eateries, Inc.

66 O.B.A.J. 3281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1995

Palmer v. Brown, 242 Kan. 893 , 752 P.2d 685, 689-690 (1988) (outside reporting of medicaid fraud of employer); See also White v. … See Brown v. MFC Finance Co. of Oklahoma, 838 P.2d 524 (Okla.Ct.App.Div.3, 1992) (employee’s jury service statutorily protected against employer’s retaliatory discharge by 38 O.S.1991, § 35).

Billings Hotel Co. v. City of Enid

77 Okla. 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1920

This court, in the ease of State ex rel. v. Brown, 24 Okla. 433 , 103 Pac. 762 , in referring to the quotation from the case of State v. Houston, supra, stated: “We adhere to the rule there announced. … This court, in case oí Morrison v. Brown, supra, states as follows: “There is no contention that the court'below did not have jurisdiction to issue a restraining order in that class of cases.

Woodrow v. State

554 P.2d 70 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 27, 1976

powdered substance contained in tin-foil and was told to him by the defendant, Thomas Perry Brown, that the brown, powdered substance was Heroin. … See, Simon v. State, supra.

Byers v. Ingraham

51 Okla. 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1915

Co. v. Henderson, 27 Okla. 560 , 112 Pac. 986 . … The levy and taking possession by the constable was unlawful in the first instance, and it has been held by this court in the case of Chandler v. Colcord, 1 Okla. 260 [ 32 Pac. 330 ], and Burchett v.

Oklahoma City v. Shields

22 Okla. 265 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1908

Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. State Board of Tax Com’rs, 199 U. S. 35 , 25 Sup. Ct. 705, 50 L. Ed. 65 ; St. Louis v. United Railway Co., 210 U. S. 266 , 28 Sup. Ct. 630, 52 *294 L. Ed. 1054; Wilmington & Weldon R. … E. 165 ; Brown v. Denver, 7 Colo. 305 , 3 Pac. 455 ; People v. McFadden, 81 Cal. 489 , 22 Pac. 851 , 15 Am. St. Rep. 66 ; Richmond v. Supervisors, Muscatine County, 77 Iowa, 513 , 42 N. W. 422 , 4 L. R. A. 445, 14 Am.

Grennan v. Carson

25 Okla. 730 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1910

In Wilhite v. … Cuddon v Eastwick, 1 Salk. 192; Luchrman v. Taxing District, 2 Lea (Tenn.) 425; People v. Morris, 13 Wend. (N. Y. ) 325; People v. Hurlbut, 24 Mich 44, 88 , 9 Am. Rep. 103 ; New Orleans R. Co. v.

Butler v. Breckinridge

442 P.2d 313 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1967

Butler v. … Board of Com’rs of Harmon County v. Keen, 194 Okl. 593 , 153 P.2d 483, 485 .

Reader v. Farriss

49 Okla. 459 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1915

(Caley v. Mills, 79 Kan. 418 , 100 Pac. 69 ).” In Brown v. … After citing the statute of that state permitting the filing of supplemental pleadings, *469 the court, in Halfmoon Bridge Co. v. Canal Board, 213 N. Y. 160 , 107 N.

Voss v. City of Oklahoma City

618 P.2d 925 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1980

IRWIN, V. C. J., concurs in result. … In such case the arbitration board’s determination shall be final.” . Brooks v. New Jersey Manufacturers Ins. Co., 170 N.J.Super. 20 , 405 A.2d 466, 471 (1979); Donnelly v.

Jarman v. Jones

84 F. Supp. 184 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1949

Brown formed a partnership under the firm name of Jarman & Brown for the general practice of law in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, said partnership commencing September 1, 1940 and continuing during all the time involved in this … V.

De Wolf v. State

95 Okla. Crim. 287 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 28, 1952

Turner v. State, 111 Tenn. 593 , 69 S. W. 774 , wherein it was held that such situation “does not vitiate the proceedings of the commissioners when the other members of the board are qualified.” … Hall v. State, supra; Makley v. State, supra; Pierpont v. State, supra.

STATE v. HOVET

2016 OK CR 26 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 2016

Neloms v. … All these, again, are civil matters. 3 We note that the Court of Civil Appeals has twice recently addressed the intersection of the APA and Board of Tests rules. Manning v. State ex rel.

Prowant v. Sealy

77 Okla. 244 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1919

Burns et al., 30 Okla. 503 , 120 Pac. 270 ; Brown et al. v. Coppadge et al., 54 Okla. 88 , 153 Pac. 817 ; Union Trust Co. et al. v. Shelby Downard Asphalt Co., 55 Okla. 251 , 156 Pac. 903 : Hanna v. … Reynolds et al., 59 Okla. 168 , 158 Pac. 301 ; Brown v. Coppadge et al., supra; 5 Ruling Case Law, No. 239.

IN RE INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 403 STATE QUESTION NO. 779

367 P.3d 472 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 2016

In re Initiative Petition No. 314, 1980 OK 174, ¶ 59 , 625 P.2d 595, 603 (quoting Fugina v. … Trades Council v. Pitts, 2003 OK 113, ¶ 13 , 82 P.3d 1008, 1013 . . See Petitioners' App. A. . In re Initiative Petition No. 314, 1980 OK 174, ¶ 67 , 625 P.2d at 605 (citing Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v.

In Re Main

162 Okla. 65 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1933

Smith v. Command, supra. … Buck v. Bell, supra.

HILL v. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE

423 P.3d 1119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 2018

Corbeil v. Emricks Van & Storage , 2017 OK 71 , ¶ 9, 404 P.3d 856 ; Brown v. Claims Mgmt. Res., Inc. , 2017 OK 13 , ¶ 9, 391 P.3d 111 ; Williams Co., Inc. v. Dunkelgod , 2012 OK 96 , ¶ 14, 295 P.3d 1107 . … Brown , 2013 VT 38 at ¶ 21-22, 194 Vt. 12 , 72 A.3d 346 .

Bonaparte v. American Vinegar Mfg. Co.

161 Okla. 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1932

In Wallace v. … In Hays v.

ASHTON v. STATE

2017 OK CR 15 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 2017

Brown telephoned her mother and asked her to come pick her up. When she arrived, Brown, Appellant and Goff got into the car. Appellant laid down in the backseat so he could not been seen. … As with Brown, Goff had related a different account to the police officers immediately following Appellant's arrest.

Pierce v. State

495 P.2d 407 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1972

Miss Smith stated that she thought the eyes were brown, and when asked on examination if she would be surprised to learn that they were blue, she simply replied that she thought they were brown. … In Muller v.

Torrance v. Bladel

195 Okla. 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1945

This is a quasi-judicial function by an administrative board.” *70 In Cash v. Beveridge, Bldg. … See Morgan v. State, 66 Okla. Cr. 205 , 90 P. 2d 683 ; and Franks v. Ponca City, 170 Okla. 134 , 38 P. 2d 912 .