Case law

Brown v. State

160 Tex. Crim. 150 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 3, 1954

It has been the rule in this court since Vyvial v. State, 115 Texas Cr. … See also Vowell v. State, 156 Texas Cr. Rep. 492 , 244 S.W. 2d 214 ; Allala v. State, 157 Texas Cr. Rep. 458 , 250 S.W. 2d 207 ; and Hicks v. State, 158 Texas Cr. Rep. 45 , 251 S.W. 2d 409 .

Brown v. State

757 S.W.2d 739 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 22, 1988

Brown v. State, 692 S.W.2d 146 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1985, pet. granted). … Brown v. State, id., at 150. If the facts were such that consent had in reality been a contested issue the court of appeals would have undoubtedly been correct in its analysis.

Brown v. . Clark

77 N.Y. 369 · New York Court of Appeals · May 20, 1879

(Ackerly v. Vernon, 1 Comyn, 381; Barnes v. Crowe, 1 Ves. Ch., 486; Mooers v. White, 6 John. Ch., 375; Van Cortlandt v. Kip, 1 Hill, 590 ; S. C., 7 id., 346.) In Van Cortlandt v. … I will cite a few of them : (Habergham v. Vincent, 2 Ves. 228; Smart v. Prujean, 6 id., 565; Williams v. Evans, 1 Cromp. & Mee., 42; Allen v. Maddock, 11 Moore’s P. C. C., 427; Burton v. Newbury, 1 L. R. Ch.

Vansickle v. Brown

68 Mo. 627 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1878

In Merkle v. … In the case of Brant v.

Brown v. Selsky

5 A.D.3d 905 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 11, 2004

Goord, 300 AD2d 956, 956 [2002]; Matter of Connell v Goord, 298 AD2d 748, 748 [2002] ). … Goord, 309 AD2d 1096, 1097 [2003], quoting Matter of James v Goord, 261 AD2d 733, 733 [1999]).

Miner v. . Brown

133 N.Y. 308 · New York Court of Appeals · May 24, 1892

In Hicks v. Cochran ( 4 Edw. … In Cloos v.

Brown v. Edgerton

14 Neb. 453 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1883

Thompson v. Brown

16 Mass. 172 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1819

In the case of Brown & Al. vs.

State v. Brown

310 Or. 347 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1990

See also Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 704-05 , 688 P2d 811 (1984) (same rule applies to exhibits). … Bates, do you know the Defendant in this case, Cornelius Brown? “A. Yes. “Q. How do you know Mr. Brown? “A. Well, I’ve met Mr.

Brown v. Vannaman

85 Wis. 451 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1893

Gottbehuet v. Hubachek, 36 Wis. 515; Spiering v. Andræ, 45 Wis. 330 ; Singer v. Bender, 64 Wis. 169 ; Muetze v. Tuteur, 77 Wis. 236 . … Corcoran v. Harran, 55 Wis. 125 ; Baker v. Madison, 62 Wis. 149 ; Murray v. Buell, 74 Wis. 17 .

Brown v. Sullivan

71 Tex. 470 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1888

(Railway v. Murphy, 46 Texas, 356 ; Railway v. Spicker, 61 Texas, 427 ; Railway v. Cowser, 57 Texas, 293 .) … The judgment in this case, as in that of Brown, Receiver v. Brown, decided at a former day of this term, attempts to make the recovery a lien upon the earnings, etc., of the railroad in the hands of the receiver.

Brown v. State

206 So. 2d 481 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 25, 1968

Heintz v. Brown

46 Wash. 387 · Washington Supreme Court · May 28, 1907

Brown was plaintiff, and the plaintiff herein and John T. Heintz, her husband, were defendants, and gave notice that he would sell the same at public auction to satisfy the above-mentioned judgment and execution. … Broughton, supra; Jackson v. Torrence, 83 Cal. 521 , 23 Pac. 695 ; Northwestern etc. Bank v. Rauch, 7 Idaho 152 , 61 Pac. 516 ; Love v. Robertson, 7 Tex. 6 , 56 Am. Dec. 41 ; Braden v. Gose, 57 Tex. 37 ; Parker v.

Texas Real Estate Commission v. Josef Adam Riekers

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Mar 3, 2020

In Garcia v. … Brown, 281 S.W.3d 692, 699–700 (Tex. App.

BROWN v. Commonwealth

453 Pa. 566 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1973

Falco v. Pados, 444 Pa. 372 , 282 A. 2d 351 (1971); Flagiello v. Pennsylvania Hospital, 417 Pa. 486 , 208 A. 2d 193 (1965). … Flagiello v.

State v. Brown

551 S.W.2d 329 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 9, 1977

It specifically stated: “We cannot say that the evidence excludes all reasonable hypothesis save guilt on the part of Redden and Clarence Ray Brown in that ease.” The Court then cited Marie v. … In Marie v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

3 Rawle 207 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1832

Mumford v. Brown

6 Cow. 475 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1826

In Doane v. Badger, ( 12 Mass. … It is, that, till such request and refusal, both tenants are in equal fault, one having as much reason to complain as the other. _ _ In Loring v. Bacon, ( 4 Mass.

Seymour v. Brown

19 Johns. 44 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1821

The general law of bailment was very ably discussed by Lord Holt, in Coggs v. Barnard; (2 Ld.

James v. Brown

25 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 432 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1982

In City of Houston v. … Brown, Hall, and Rosen-thal could not have been arrived at properly during their brief periods of observation.